drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 19 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Use GENMASK() to define the prescaler mask and make the whole driver use
the mask (together with helpers such as FIELD_GET and FIELD_PREP)
instead of needed an additional shift and max value constant.
Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
---
drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
index 8dd1e46b7176..1eb91fa00657 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/clockchips.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
@@ -31,10 +32,7 @@
#define GT_CONTROL_COMP_ENABLE BIT(1) /* banked */
#define GT_CONTROL_IRQ_ENABLE BIT(2) /* banked */
#define GT_CONTROL_AUTO_INC BIT(3) /* banked */
-#define GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT 8
-#define GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MAX 0xFF
-#define GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK (GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MAX << \
- GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT)
+#define GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK GENMASK(15, 8)
#define GT_INT_STATUS 0x0c
#define GT_INT_STATUS_EVENT_FLAG BIT(0)
@@ -247,7 +245,7 @@ static void gt_write_presc(u32 psv)
reg = readl(gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
reg &= ~GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK;
- reg |= psv << GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT;
+ reg |= FIELD_PREP(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK, psv);
writel(reg, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
}
@@ -256,8 +254,7 @@ static u32 gt_read_presc(void)
u32 reg;
reg = readl(gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
- reg &= GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK;
- return reg >> GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT;
+ return FIELD_GET(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK, reg);
}
static void __init gt_delay_timer_init(void)
@@ -272,9 +269,9 @@ static int __init gt_clocksource_init(void)
writel(0, gt_base + GT_COUNTER0);
writel(0, gt_base + GT_COUNTER1);
/* set prescaler and enable timer on all the cores */
- writel(((CONFIG_ARM_GT_INITIAL_PRESCALER_VAL - 1) <<
- GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_SHIFT)
- | GT_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
+ writel(FIELD_PREP(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK,
+ CONFIG_ARM_GT_INITIAL_PRESCALER_VAL - 1) |
+ GT_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
#ifdef CONFIG_CLKSRC_ARM_GLOBAL_TIMER_SCHED_CLOCK
sched_clock_register(gt_sched_clock_read, 64, gt_target_rate);
@@ -301,7 +298,7 @@ static int gt_clk_rate_change_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
psv--;
/* prescaler within legal range? */
- if (psv < 0 || psv > GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MAX)
+ if (psv < 0 || psv > FIELD_GET(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK, ~0))
return NOTIFY_BAD;
/*
--
2.43.2
Hi Martin, thank you for providing these cleanups. One question below: On 21/02/2024 22:43, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: [ ... ] > /* prescaler within legal range? */ > - if (psv < 0 || psv > GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MAX) > + if (psv < 0 || psv > FIELD_GET(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK, ~0)) FIELD_MAX() ? [ ... ] -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Hi Daniel, On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:02 AM Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: [ ... ] > > > /* prescaler within legal range? */ > > - if (psv < 0 || psv > GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MAX) > > + if (psv < 0 || psv > FIELD_GET(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK, ~0)) > > FIELD_MAX() ? Oh, I was not aware of FIELD_MAX() - thank you! While researching that I found that there's also FIELD_FIT() which I think is perfect here. What do you think? Best regards, Martin
On 22/02/2024 22:57, Martin Blumenstingl wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 11:02 AM Daniel Lezcano > <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: > [ ... ] >> >>> /* prescaler within legal range? */ >>> - if (psv < 0 || psv > GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MAX) >>> + if (psv < 0 || psv > FIELD_GET(GT_CONTROL_PRESCALER_MASK, ~0)) >> >> FIELD_MAX() ? > Oh, I was not aware of FIELD_MAX() - thank you! > While researching that I found that there's also FIELD_FIT() which I > think is perfect here. What do you think? Ah yes, even better :) -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.