'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.

This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
__printf attribute.

Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
 drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
 
 		days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
 
-		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
+		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
 			year, month, mday, yday, days
 
 		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
-- 
2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog

Hello,

On 21/02/2024 17:27:18+0800, David Gow wrote:
> 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
> 
> This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
> __printf attribute.
> 
> Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Who do you expect to take this patch?

> ---
>  drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  		days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
>  
> -		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
> +		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
>  			year, month, mday, yday, days
>  
>  		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
> -- 
> 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
> 
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

On 2/27/24 13:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 21/02/2024 17:27:18+0800, David Gow wrote:
>> 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
>>
>> This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
>> __printf attribute.
>>
>> Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
>> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> 
> Who do you expect to take this patch?
> 

I am going to be applying this series to linux-kselftest kunit next
in just a bit. Would you like to ack the pacth?

thanks,
-- Shuah

On 27/02/2024 14:23:29-0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/27/24 13:32, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > On 21/02/2024 17:27:18+0800, David Gow wrote:
> > > 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
> > > 
> > > This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
> > > __printf attribute.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
> > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> > 
> > Who do you expect to take this patch?
> > 
> 
> I am going to be applying this series to linux-kselftest kunit next
> in just a bit. Would you like to ack the pacth?

Sure,

Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>

> 
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
> 
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
>
> This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
> __printf attribute.
>
> Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
>
>  		days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
>
> -		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
> +		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
>  			year, month, mday, yday, days
>
>  		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
> --
> 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
>

Thanks
Justin

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 05:27:18PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> 'days' is a s64 (from div_s64), and so should use a %lld specifier.
> 
> This was found by extending KUnit's assertion macros to use gcc's
> __printf attribute.
> 
> Fixes: 1d1bb12a8b18 ("rtc: Improve performance of rtc_time64_to_tm(). Add tests.")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---
>  drivers/rtc/lib_test.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> index d5caf36c56cd..225c859d6da5 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/lib_test.c
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void rtc_time64_to_tm_test_date_range(struct kunit *test)
>  
>  		days = div_s64(secs, 86400);
>  
> -		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %ld", \
> +		#define FAIL_MSG "%d/%02d/%02d (%2d) : %lld", \
>  			year, month, mday, yday, days
>  
>  		KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ_MSG(test, year - 1900, result.tm_year, FAIL_MSG);
> -- 
> 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
>