Drop one struct description to fix a kernel-doc warning:

drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c:42: warning: Excess struct member 'led_data' description in 'mlxreg_led_data'

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c |    1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff -- a/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c b/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c
--- a/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
  * @data: led configuration data;
  * @led_cdev: led class data;
  * @base_color: base led color (other colors have constant offset from base);
- * @led_data: led data;
  * @data_parent: pointer to private device control data of parent;
  * @led_cdev_name: class device name
  */

On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Randy Dunlap wrote:

Would you mind being more descriptive in your subject lines please?

It's common for people (me included) to find subject lines a reliable
way to search through Git history and these types of descriptions are
likely to cause duplication.

Thanks.

> Drop one struct description to fix a kernel-doc warning:
> 
> drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c:42: warning: Excess struct member 'led_data' description in 'mlxreg_led_data'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c |    1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff -- a/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c b/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-mlxreg.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,6 @@
>   * @data: led configuration data;
>   * @led_cdev: led class data;
>   * @base_color: base led color (other colors have constant offset from base);
> - * @led_data: led data;
>   * @data_parent: pointer to private device control data of parent;
>   * @led_cdev_name: class device name
>   */

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Lee Jones wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> Would you mind being more descriptive in your subject lines please?
> 
> It's common for people (me included) to find subject lines a reliable
> way to search through Git history and these types of descriptions are
> likely to cause duplication.

Also if you push them in a set, they're easier to apply.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

Hi,

On 2/23/24 03:01, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> Would you mind being more descriptive in your subject lines please?

Will do.

>> It's common for people (me included) to find subject lines a reliable
>> way to search through Git history and these types of descriptions are
>> likely to cause duplication.
> 
> Also if you push them in a set, they're easier to apply.

Do you mean a git tree or a patch series?
I'll be glad to change the 3 patches to a patch series.

Thanks.
-- 
#Randy