On 5/2/2024 7:07 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>> @@ -7767,6 +7771,41 @@ static void update_intel_pt_cfg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vmx->pt_desc.ctl_bitmask &= ~(0xfULL << (32 + i * 4));
>> }
>>
>> +static void vmx_update_intercept_for_cet_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + bool incpt;
>> +
>> + if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
>> + incpt = !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);
>> +
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_U_CET,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_S_CET,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB,
>> + MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
>> + if (!incpt)
>> + return;
> Hmm, I find this is unnecessarily confusing and brittle. E.g. in the unlikely
> event more CET stuff comes along, this lurking return could cause problems.
>
> Why not handle S_CET and U_CET in a single common path? IMO, this is less error
> prone, and more clearly captures the relationship between S/U_CET, SHSTK, and IBT.
> Updating MSR intercepts is not a hot path, so the overhead of checking guest CPUID
> multiple times should be a non-issue. And eventually KVM should effectively cache
> all of those lookups, i.e. the cost will be negilible.
>
> bool incpt;
>
> if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK)) {
> incpt = !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);
>
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL0_SSP,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL1_SSP,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL2_SSP,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_INT_SSP_TAB,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> }
>
> if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_SHSTK) ||
> kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_IBT)) {
> incpt = !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBT) &&
> !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SHSTK);
>
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_U_CET,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_S_CET,
> MSR_TYPE_RW, incpt);
> }
It looks fine to me, will apply it, thanks!