Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 8 ++++---- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip. Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer Tim Lunn (4): dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Orange Pi RK3399 board dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Banana Pi R2 Pro arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on Banana Pi R2 Pro board arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on orangepi rk3399 board Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 8 ++++---- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 2 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.40.1
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:07:27 +1100, Tim Lunn wrote:
> A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip
> when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip.
>
> Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer
>
>
> Tim Lunn (4):
> dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Orange Pi RK3399 board
> dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Banana Pi R2 Pro
> arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on Banana Pi R2 Pro board
> arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on orangepi rk3399 board
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Orange Pi RK3399 board
commit: db51e128df1010653aab71c07e06280e37fecaeb
[2/4] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Banana Pi R2 Pro
commit: a03fd4b3bebc9775c921a965c4c22b1a0d3a2503
[3/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on Banana Pi R2 Pro board
commit: 437644753208092f642b7669c69da606aa07dfb4
[4/4] arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on orangepi rk3399 board
commit: 7ec958ed6a32daad36918d200b594f33cb4e0dd7
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Hello Tim, On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote: > A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip > when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip. > > Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible" strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel code, such as in some drivers? Otherwise, for the entire series: Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> > Tim Lunn (4): > dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Orange Pi RK3399 board > dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Banana Pi R2 Pro > arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on Banana Pi R2 Pro board > arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on orangepi rk3399 board > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 8 ++++---- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Hi Dragan, On 2/14/24 15:14, Dragan Simic wrote: > Hello Tim, > > On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote: >> A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip >> when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip. >> >> Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer > > Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible" > strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel code, > such as in some drivers? > Yes I checked that, there are no remaining references to the old/incorrect compatible strings in kernel code Regards Tim > Otherwise, for the entire series: > > Reviewed-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org> > >> Tim Lunn (4): >> dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Orange Pi RK3399 board >> dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: Correct vendor for Banana Pi R2 Pro >> arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on Banana Pi R2 Pro board >> arm64: dts: rockchip: adjust vendor on orangepi rk3399 board >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 8 ++++---- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-orangepi.dts | 2 +- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dts | 2 +- >> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:27:08PM +1100, Tim Lunn wrote: > Hi Dragan, > > On 2/14/24 15:14, Dragan Simic wrote: > > Hello Tim, > > > > On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote: > > > A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip > > > when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip. > > > > > > Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer > > > > Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible" > > strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel code, > > such as in some drivers? > > > Yes I checked that, there are no remaining references to the old/incorrect > compatible strings in kernel code What about other code? Like a BSD or a bootloader? If nothing is using them Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Fixes tags I think wouldn't go amiss, but I'm not expecting a resend with them. Cheers, Conor.
Hi Conor, On 2/15/24 05:12, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:27:08PM +1100, Tim Lunn wrote: >> Hi Dragan, >> >> On 2/14/24 15:14, Dragan Simic wrote: >>> Hello Tim, >>> >>> On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote: >>>> A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip >>>> when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip. >>>> >>>> Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer >>> Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible" >>> strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel code, >>> such as in some drivers? >>> >> Yes I checked that, there are no remaining references to the old/incorrect >> compatible strings in kernel code > What about other code? Like a BSD or a bootloader? If nothing is using > them > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > Fixes tags I think wouldn't go amiss, but I'm not expecting a resend > with them. I've added the fixes tags to the email thread. Regards Tim > > Cheers, > Conor.
Hello Conor, On 2024-02-14 19:12, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 03:27:08PM +1100, Tim Lunn wrote: >> On 2/14/24 15:14, Dragan Simic wrote: >> > On 2024-02-14 05:07, Tim Lunn wrote: >> > > A couple of rockchip boards incorrectly list their vendor as Rockchip >> > > when they are in fact not manufactured by Rockchip. >> > > >> > > Fix the vendor strings to correctly list the manufacturer >> > >> > Just checking, have you verified that the old, incorrect "compatible" >> > strings from the board dts files aren't used anywhere in the kernel code, >> > such as in some drivers? >> > >> Yes I checked that, there are no remaining references to the >> old/incorrect >> compatible strings in kernel code > > What about other code? Like a BSD or a bootloader? If nothing is using > them > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> I just quickly checked U-Boot and it's fine. > Fixes tags I think wouldn't go amiss, but I'm not expecting a resend > with them.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.