The sdhci driver has been around for several years, and it supports
the OMAP3 family. Instead of using the older driver, let's finally
migrate to the newer one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap3.dtsi
index 92cd4c99dae7..218d7212c749 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap3.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/ti/omap/omap3.dtsi
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ hdqw1w: 1w@480b2000 {
};
mmc1: mmc@4809c000 {
- compatible = "ti,omap3-hsmmc";
+ compatible = "ti,omap3-sdhci";
reg = <0x4809c000 0x200>;
interrupts = <83>;
ti,hwmods = "mmc1";
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ mmc1: mmc@4809c000 {
};
mmc2: mmc@480b4000 {
- compatible = "ti,omap3-hsmmc";
+ compatible = "ti,omap3-sdhci";
reg = <0x480b4000 0x200>;
interrupts = <86>;
ti,hwmods = "mmc2";
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ mmc2: mmc@480b4000 {
};
mmc3: mmc@480ad000 {
- compatible = "ti,omap3-hsmmc";
+ compatible = "ti,omap3-sdhci";
reg = <0x480ad000 0x200>;
interrupts = <94>;
ti,hwmods = "mmc3";
--
2.43.0
* Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 12:41]: > The sdhci driver has been around for several years, and it supports > the OMAP3 family. Instead of using the older driver, let's finally > migrate to the newer one. I think we also should do these to avoid incomplete conversion: - ti,dual-volt property can be dropped - ti,non-removable should become non-removable - ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc probably should not be needed with sdhci Regards, Tony
* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [240213 12:56]: > * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 12:41]: > > The sdhci driver has been around for several years, and it supports > > the OMAP3 family. Instead of using the older driver, let's finally > > migrate to the newer one. > > I think we also should do these to avoid incomplete conversion: > > - ti,dual-volt property can be dropped > > - ti,non-removable should become non-removable > > - ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc probably should not be needed with sdhci Hmm actually we may need to set SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK for compatible ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc. Regards, Tony
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:02 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [240213 12:56]: > > * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 12:41]: > > > The sdhci driver has been around for several years, and it supports > > > the OMAP3 family. Instead of using the older driver, let's finally > > > migrate to the newer one. > > > > I think we also should do these to avoid incomplete conversion: > > > > - ti,dual-volt property can be dropped > > > > - ti,non-removable should become non-removable I'll do a more comprehensive search for these flags. When I did my testing on the AM3517, I didn't notice these, but I see now that others might. I'll do a multi-patch series to first address the multi-block, then omap3-ldp.dts, then migrate the omap3.dtsi to the new driver while dropping the flags, and lastly update the individual boards accordingly. I just have one question below. > > > > - ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc probably should not be needed with sdhci > > Hmm actually we may need to set SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK for > compatible ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc. Should I update the driver and binding to add ti,omap3-pre-es3-sdhci to set that flag, or should we create a boolean (maybe 'ti,sdhci-no-multiblock') to the device tree options for that driver? adam > > Regards, > > Tony
* Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 13:29]: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:02 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [240213 12:56]: > > > * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 12:41]: > > > > The sdhci driver has been around for several years, and it supports > > > > the OMAP3 family. Instead of using the older driver, let's finally > > > > migrate to the newer one. > > > > > > I think we also should do these to avoid incomplete conversion: > > > > > > - ti,dual-volt property can be dropped > > > > > > - ti,non-removable should become non-removable > > I'll do a more comprehensive search for these flags. When I did my > testing on the AM3517, I didn't notice these, but I see now that > others might. I'll do a multi-patch series to first address the > multi-block, then omap3-ldp.dts, then migrate the omap3.dtsi to the > new driver while dropping the flags, and lastly update the individual > boards accordingly. I just have one question below. OK sounds good to me :) > > > - ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc probably should not be needed with sdhci > > > > Hmm actually we may need to set SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK for > > compatible ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc. > > Should I update the driver and binding to add ti,omap3-pre-es3-sdhci > to set that flag, or should we create a boolean (maybe > 'ti,sdhci-no-multiblock') to the device tree options for that driver? Probably best to set up some sdhci generic property for it that then sets SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK. Regards, Tony
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:36 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 13:29]: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 7:02 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote: > > > > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [240213 12:56]: > > > > * Adam Ford <aford173@gmail.com> [240213 12:41]: > > > > > The sdhci driver has been around for several years, and it supports > > > > > the OMAP3 family. Instead of using the older driver, let's finally > > > > > migrate to the newer one. > > > > > > > > I think we also should do these to avoid incomplete conversion: > > > > > > > > - ti,dual-volt property can be dropped > > > > > > > > - ti,non-removable should become non-removable > > > > I'll do a more comprehensive search for these flags. When I did my > > testing on the AM3517, I didn't notice these, but I see now that > > others might. I'll do a multi-patch series to first address the > > multi-block, then omap3-ldp.dts, then migrate the omap3.dtsi to the > > new driver while dropping the flags, and lastly update the individual > > boards accordingly. I just have one question below. > > OK sounds good to me :) > > > > > - ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc probably should not be needed with sdhci > > > > > > Hmm actually we may need to set SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK for > > > compatible ti,omap3-pre-es3-hsmmc. > > > > Should I update the driver and binding to add ti,omap3-pre-es3-sdhci > > to set that flag, or should we create a boolean (maybe > > 'ti,sdhci-no-multiblock') to the device tree options for that driver? > > Probably best to set up some sdhci generic property for it that then > sets SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_MULTIBLOCK. Sounds good. I'll try to work on this tonight, but it might be a day or two before I get the more comprehensive update out. Hopefully in the meantime, people may respond with other comments too. I also want to retest my OMAP35 and DM37 boards. It's been since kernel 6.1 since I tested them all. adam > > Regards, > > Tony
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.