Similar to the existing "ports" node name, coresight device tree bindings
have added "in-ports" and "out-ports" as standard node names for a
collection of ports.
Add support for these name to of_graph_get_port_parent() so that
remote-endpoint parsing can find the correct parent node for these
coresight ports too.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
drivers/of/property.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 7bb2d8e290de..39a3ee1dfb58 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_parent(struct device_node *node)
/* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node. */
for (depth = 3; depth && node; depth--) {
node = of_get_next_parent(node);
- if (depth == 2 && !of_node_name_eq(node, "ports"))
+ if (depth == 2 && !of_node_name_eq(node, "ports") &&
+ !of_node_name_eq(node, "in-ports") &&
+ !of_node_name_eq(node, "out-ports"))
break;
}
return node;
--
2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 5:18 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
>
> Similar to the existing "ports" node name, coresight device tree bindings
> have added "in-ports" and "out-ports" as standard node names for a
> collection of ports.
>
> Add support for these name to of_graph_get_port_parent() so that
> remote-endpoint parsing can find the correct parent node for these
> coresight ports too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Greg,
I saw that you pulled the previous 2 patches in this series to 6.1,
6.6 and 6.7 kernel branches. I really should have added both of those
Fixes tag to this patch too.
Can you please pull in the patch to those stable branches too?
Thanks,
Saravana
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
> index 7bb2d8e290de..39a3ee1dfb58 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/property.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/property.c
> @@ -763,7 +763,9 @@ struct device_node *of_graph_get_port_parent(struct device_node *node)
> /* Walk 3 levels up only if there is 'ports' node. */
> for (depth = 3; depth && node; depth--) {
> node = of_get_next_parent(node);
> - if (depth == 2 && !of_node_name_eq(node, "ports"))
> + if (depth == 2 && !of_node_name_eq(node, "ports") &&
> + !of_node_name_eq(node, "in-ports") &&
> + !of_node_name_eq(node, "out-ports"))
> break;
> }
> return node;
> --
> 2.43.0.594.gd9cf4e227d-goog
>
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:47:35PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 5:18 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > Similar to the existing "ports" node name, coresight device tree bindings > > have added "in-ports" and "out-ports" as standard node names for a > > collection of ports. > > > > Add support for these name to of_graph_get_port_parent() so that > > remote-endpoint parsing can find the correct parent node for these > > coresight ports too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > > Greg, > > I saw that you pulled the previous 2 patches in this series to 6.1, > 6.6 and 6.7 kernel branches. I really should have added both of those > Fixes tag to this patch too. > > Can you please pull in the patch to those stable branches too? Sure, what's the git id? thanks, greg k-h
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:00:00AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 04:47:35PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 5:18 PM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > Similar to the existing "ports" node name, coresight device tree bindings > > > have added "in-ports" and "out-ports" as standard node names for a > > > collection of ports. > > > > > > Add support for these name to of_graph_get_port_parent() so that > > > remote-endpoint parsing can find the correct parent node for these > > > coresight ports too. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > > > > Greg, > > > > I saw that you pulled the previous 2 patches in this series to 6.1, > > 6.6 and 6.7 kernel branches. I really should have added both of those > > Fixes tag to this patch too. > > > > Can you please pull in the patch to those stable branches too? > > Sure, what's the git id? Nevermind, I found it...
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.