The interrupt storm detection mechanism we implemented requires a
considerable amount of global storage space when configured for
the maximum number of CPUs.
Therefore, adding a SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM Kconfig knob that
defaults to "yes" if the max number of CPUs is <= 128.
Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +-
lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 +++++++++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 26dc1ad86276..1595e4a94774 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ __setup("watchdog_thresh=", watchdog_thresh_setup);
static void __lockup_detector_cleanup(void);
-#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
#define NUM_STATS_GROUPS 5
#define NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP 4
enum stats_per_group {
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 975a07f9f1cc..74002ba7c42d 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1029,6 +1029,19 @@ config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
chance to run. The current stack trace is displayed upon
detection and the system will stay locked up.
+config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
+ bool "Detect Interrupt Storm in Soft Lockups"
+ depends on SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR && IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
+ default y if NR_CPUS <= 128
+ help
+ Say Y here to enable the kernel to detect interrupt storm
+ during "soft lockups".
+
+ "soft lockups" can be caused by a variety of reasons. If one is caused by
+ an interrupt storm, then the storming interrupts will not be on the
+ callstack. To detect this case, it is necessary to report the CPU stats
+ and the interrupt counts during the "soft lockups".
+
config BOOTPARAM_SOFTLOCKUP_PANIC
bool "Panic (Reboot) On Soft Lockups"
depends on SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
--
2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:59 AM Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> The interrupt storm detection mechanism we implemented requires a
> considerable amount of global storage space when configured for
> the maximum number of CPUs.
> Therefore, adding a SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM Kconfig knob that
> defaults to "yes" if the max number of CPUs is <= 128.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +-
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 +++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
IMO this should be squashed into patch #1, though I won't insist.
> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
> index 26dc1ad86276..1595e4a94774 100644
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ __setup("watchdog_thresh=", watchdog_thresh_setup);
>
> static void __lockup_detector_cleanup(void);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
> #define NUM_STATS_GROUPS 5
> #define NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP 4
> enum stats_per_group {
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 975a07f9f1cc..74002ba7c42d 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -1029,6 +1029,19 @@ config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
> chance to run. The current stack trace is displayed upon
> detection and the system will stay locked up.
>
> +config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
> + bool "Detect Interrupt Storm in Soft Lockups"
> + depends on SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR && IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
> + default y if NR_CPUS <= 128
> + help
> + Say Y here to enable the kernel to detect interrupt storm
> + during "soft lockups".
> +
> + "soft lockups" can be caused by a variety of reasons. If one is caused by
> + an interrupt storm, then the storming interrupts will not be on the
> + callstack. To detect this case, it is necessary to report the CPU stats
> + and the interrupt counts during the "soft lockups".
It's probably not terribly important, but I notice that the other help
text in this file is generally wrapped to 80 columns. Even though the
kernel has relaxed the 80 column rule a bit, it still feels like this
could easily be wrapped to 80 columns without sacrificing any
readability.
In any case:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
On 2024/2/7 05:42, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 1:59 AM Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>>
>> The interrupt storm detection mechanism we implemented requires a
>> considerable amount of global storage space when configured for
>> the maximum number of CPUs.
>> Therefore, adding a SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM Kconfig knob that
>> defaults to "yes" if the max number of CPUs is <= 128.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bitao Hu <yaoma@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/watchdog.c | 2 +-
>> lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 +++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> IMO this should be squashed into patch #1, though I won't insist.
Agree.
>
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
>> index 26dc1ad86276..1595e4a94774 100644
>> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c
>> +++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
>> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ __setup("watchdog_thresh=", watchdog_thresh_setup);
>>
>> static void __lockup_detector_cleanup(void);
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
>> #define NUM_STATS_GROUPS 5
>> #define NUM_STATS_PER_GROUP 4
>> enum stats_per_group {
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> index 975a07f9f1cc..74002ba7c42d 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -1029,6 +1029,19 @@ config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR
>> chance to run. The current stack trace is displayed upon
>> detection and the system will stay locked up.
>>
>> +config SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR_INTR_STORM
>> + bool "Detect Interrupt Storm in Soft Lockups"
>> + depends on SOFTLOCKUP_DETECTOR && IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING
>> + default y if NR_CPUS <= 128
>> + help
>> + Say Y here to enable the kernel to detect interrupt storm
>> + during "soft lockups".
>> +
>> + "soft lockups" can be caused by a variety of reasons. If one is caused by
>> + an interrupt storm, then the storming interrupts will not be on the
>> + callstack. To detect this case, it is necessary to report the CPU stats
>> + and the interrupt counts during the "soft lockups".
>
> It's probably not terribly important, but I notice that the other help
> text in this file is generally wrapped to 80 columns. Even though the
> kernel has relaxed the 80 column rule a bit, it still feels like this
> could easily be wrapped to 80 columns without sacrificing any
> readability.
OK.
>
> In any case:
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.