drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------ drivers/connector/connector.c | 9 +++++++++ include/linux/connector.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
From: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
It is inaccurate to judge whether proc_event_num_listeners is
cleared by cn_netlink_send_mult returning -ESRCH.
In the case of stress-ng netlink-proc, -ESRCH will always be returned,
because netlink_broadcast_filtered will return -ESRCH,
which may cause stress-ng netlink-proc performance degradation.
If the judgment condition is modified to whether there is a listener.
proc_event_num_listeners will still be wrong due to concurrency.
So replace the counter with cn_netlink_has_listeners
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401112259.b23a1567-oliver.sang@intel.com
Fixes: c46bfba1337d ("connector: Fix proc_event_num_listeners count not cleared")
Signed-off-by: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
Cc: fengwei.yin@intel.com
Cc: fw@strlen.de
---
drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/connector/connector.c | 9 +++++++++
include/linux/connector.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
index 3d5e6d705..4898e974c 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static int cn_filter(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
return 1;
}
+static int cn_netlink_has_listeners(void)
+{
+ struct sock *sk = get_cdev_nls();
+
+ if (sk)
+ return netlink_has_listeners(sk, CN_IDX_PROC);
+ else
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
{
__u32 filter_data[2];
@@ -108,9 +118,8 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
filter_data[1] = 0;
}
- if (cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
- cn_filter, (void *)filter_data) == -ESRCH)
- atomic_set(&proc_event_num_listeners, 0);
+ cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
+ cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);
local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
}
@@ -122,7 +131,7 @@ void proc_fork_connector(struct task_struct *task)
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
struct task_struct *parent;
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -151,7 +160,7 @@ void proc_exec_connector(struct task_struct *task)
struct proc_event *ev;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -176,7 +185,7 @@ void proc_id_connector(struct task_struct *task, int which_id)
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
const struct cred *cred;
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -213,7 +222,7 @@ void proc_sid_connector(struct task_struct *task)
struct proc_event *ev;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -237,7 +246,7 @@ void proc_ptrace_connector(struct task_struct *task, int ptrace_id)
struct proc_event *ev;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -269,7 +278,7 @@ void proc_comm_connector(struct task_struct *task)
struct proc_event *ev;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -295,7 +304,7 @@ void proc_coredump_connector(struct task_struct *task)
struct task_struct *parent;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -328,7 +337,7 @@ void proc_exit_connector(struct task_struct *task)
struct task_struct *parent;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
@@ -370,7 +379,7 @@ static void cn_proc_ack(int err, int rcvd_seq, int rcvd_ack)
struct proc_event *ev;
__u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
return;
msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
index 7f7b94f61..42bcb39ba 100644
--- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
+++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
@@ -129,6 +129,15 @@ int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 __group,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send);
+struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void)
+{
+ if (cn_already_initialized == 1)
+ return cdev.nls;
+ else
+ return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cdev_nls);
+
/*
* Callback helper - queues work and setup destructor for given data.
*/
diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
index cec2d99ae..255466aea 100644
--- a/include/linux/connector.h
+++ b/include/linux/connector.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
*/
int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
+struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void);
int cn_queue_add_callback(struct cn_queue_dev *dev, const char *name,
const struct cb_id *id,
void (*callback)(struct cn_msg *, struct netlink_skb_parms *));
--
2.27.0Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 02:44:59AM CET, wangkeqi_chris@163.com wrote:
>From: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
Care to fix your name please?
>
>It is inaccurate to judge whether proc_event_num_listeners is
>cleared by cn_netlink_send_mult returning -ESRCH.
>In the case of stress-ng netlink-proc, -ESRCH will always be returned,
>because netlink_broadcast_filtered will return -ESRCH,
>which may cause stress-ng netlink-proc performance degradation.
>If the judgment condition is modified to whether there is a listener.
This sentence does not sound complete.
>proc_event_num_listeners will still be wrong due to concurrency.
>So replace the counter with cn_netlink_has_listeners
I'm reading the whole patch description for 5th time, I still don't
understand it :(
>
>Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
>Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202401112259.b23a1567-oliver.sang@intel.com
>Fixes: c46bfba1337d ("connector: Fix proc_event_num_listeners count not cleared")
>Signed-off-by: wangkeqi <wangkeqiwang@didiglobal.com>
Same here.
>Cc: fengwei.yin@intel.com
>Cc: fw@strlen.de
>---
> drivers/connector/cn_proc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/connector/connector.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/connector.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
>index 3d5e6d705..4898e974c 100644
>--- a/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
>+++ b/drivers/connector/cn_proc.c
>@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static int cn_filter(struct sock *dsk, struct sk_buff *skb, void *data)
> return 1;
> }
>
>+static int cn_netlink_has_listeners(void)
>+{
>+ struct sock *sk = get_cdev_nls();
>+
>+ if (sk)
>+ return netlink_has_listeners(sk, CN_IDX_PROC);
>+ else
>+ return 0;
>+}
>+
> static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
> {
> __u32 filter_data[2];
>@@ -108,9 +118,8 @@ static inline void send_msg(struct cn_msg *msg)
> filter_data[1] = 0;
> }
>
>- if (cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
>- cn_filter, (void *)filter_data) == -ESRCH)
>- atomic_set(&proc_event_num_listeners, 0);
>+ cn_netlink_send_mult(msg, msg->len, 0, CN_IDX_PROC, GFP_NOWAIT,
>+ cn_filter, (void *)filter_data);
>
> local_unlock(&local_event.lock);
> }
>@@ -122,7 +131,7 @@ void proc_fork_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
> struct task_struct *parent;
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -151,7 +160,7 @@ void proc_exec_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> struct proc_event *ev;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -176,7 +185,7 @@ void proc_id_connector(struct task_struct *task, int which_id)
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
> const struct cred *cred;
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -213,7 +222,7 @@ void proc_sid_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> struct proc_event *ev;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -237,7 +246,7 @@ void proc_ptrace_connector(struct task_struct *task, int ptrace_id)
> struct proc_event *ev;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -269,7 +278,7 @@ void proc_comm_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> struct proc_event *ev;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -295,7 +304,7 @@ void proc_coredump_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> struct task_struct *parent;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -328,7 +337,7 @@ void proc_exit_connector(struct task_struct *task)
> struct task_struct *parent;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>@@ -370,7 +379,7 @@ static void cn_proc_ack(int err, int rcvd_seq, int rcvd_ack)
> struct proc_event *ev;
> __u8 buffer[CN_PROC_MSG_SIZE] __aligned(8);
>
>- if (atomic_read(&proc_event_num_listeners) < 1)
>+ if (!cn_netlink_has_listeners())
> return;
Are you still using &proc_event_num_listeners for anything? If not, why
don't you remove it entirely?
>
> msg = buffer_to_cn_msg(buffer);
>diff --git a/drivers/connector/connector.c b/drivers/connector/connector.c
>index 7f7b94f61..42bcb39ba 100644
>--- a/drivers/connector/connector.c
>+++ b/drivers/connector/connector.c
>@@ -129,6 +129,15 @@ int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 __group,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cn_netlink_send);
>
>+struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void)
Perhaps name it cn_cdev_nls_get() to be aligned with the rest?
>+{
>+ if (cn_already_initialized == 1)
>+ return cdev.nls;
>+ else
>+ return NULL;
>+}
>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_cdev_nls);
>+
> /*
> * Callback helper - queues work and setup destructor for given data.
> */
>diff --git a/include/linux/connector.h b/include/linux/connector.h
>index cec2d99ae..255466aea 100644
>--- a/include/linux/connector.h
>+++ b/include/linux/connector.h
>@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ int cn_netlink_send_mult(struct cn_msg *msg, u16 len, u32 portid,
> */
> int cn_netlink_send(struct cn_msg *msg, u32 portid, u32 group, gfp_t gfp_mask);
>
>+struct sock *get_cdev_nls(void);
Add empty line.
> int cn_queue_add_callback(struct cn_queue_dev *dev, const char *name,
> const struct cb_id *id,
> void (*callback)(struct cn_msg *, struct netlink_skb_parms *));
>--
>2.27.0
>
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.