On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 01:46:40PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> We want to make use of pte_next_pfn() outside of set_ptes(). Let's
> simply define PFN_PTE_SHIFT, required by pte_next_pfn().
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 1299b56e43f6..4b91e65c85d9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -1316,6 +1316,8 @@ pgprot_t pgprot_writecombine(pgprot_t prot);
> #define pgprot_writethrough pgprot_writethrough
> pgprot_t pgprot_writethrough(pgprot_t prot);
>
> +#define PFN_PTE_SHIFT PAGE_SHIFT
> +
> /*
> * Set multiple PTEs to consecutive pages with a single call. All PTEs
> * are within the same folio, PMD and VMA.
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.