As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
This series simplifies it.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
---
Konrad Dybcio (2):
      dt-bindings: thermal-zones: Don't require polling-delay(-passive)
      thermal/of: Assume polling-delay(-passive) 0 when absent

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/thermal-zones.yaml |  2 --
 drivers/thermal/thermal_of.c                                 | 12 ++++++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 01af33cc9894b4489fb68fa35c40e9fe85df63dc
change-id: 20240125-topic-thermal-f954cf83fc50

Best regards,
-- 
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>

On 25/01/2024 13:11, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> As it stands, setting 0 explicitly feels like spam inside the DTs.
> This series simplifies it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
> ---

Applied, thanks


-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog