drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
The MMC core sets BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH for devices where dma_mask
is unassigned.
For the majority of MMC hosts this path is never taken: the
OF core will unconditionally assign a 32-bit mask to any
OF device, and most MMC hosts are probed from device tree,
see drivers/of/platform.c:
of_platform_device_create_pdata()
dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
if (!dev->dev.dma_mask)
dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
of_amba_device_create()
dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
MMC devices that are probed from ACPI or PCI will likewise
have a proper dma_mask assigned.
The only remaining devices that could have a blank dma_mask
are platform devices instantiated from board files.
These are mostly used on systems without CONFIG_HIGHMEM
enabled which means the block layer will not bounce, and in
the few cases where it is enabled it is not used anyway:
for example some OMAP2 systems such as Nokia n800/n810 will
create a platform_device and not assign a dma_mask, however
they do not have any highmem, so no bouncing will happen
anyway: the block core checks if max_low_pfn >= max_pfn
and this will always be false.
Should it turn out there is a platform_device with blank
DMA mask actually using CONFIG_HIGHMEM somewhere out there
we should set dma_mask for it, not do this trickery.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
index a0a2412f62a7..316415588a77 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c
@@ -351,8 +351,6 @@ static void mmc_setup_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card)
if (mmc_can_erase(card))
mmc_queue_setup_discard(mq->queue, card);
- if (!mmc_dev(host)->dma_mask || !*mmc_dev(host)->dma_mask)
- blk_queue_bounce_limit(mq->queue, BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH);
blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mq->queue,
min(host->max_blk_count, host->max_req_size / 512));
if (host->can_dma_map_merge)
---
base-commit: 6613476e225e090cc9aad49be7fa504e290dd33d
change-id: 20240124-mmc-no-blk-bounce-high-d84e8898c707
Best regards,
--
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 09:50, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > The MMC core sets BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH for devices where dma_mask > is unassigned. > > For the majority of MMC hosts this path is never taken: the > OF core will unconditionally assign a 32-bit mask to any > OF device, and most MMC hosts are probed from device tree, > see drivers/of/platform.c: > > of_platform_device_create_pdata() > dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > if (!dev->dev.dma_mask) > dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask; > > of_amba_device_create() > dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask; > > MMC devices that are probed from ACPI or PCI will likewise > have a proper dma_mask assigned. > > The only remaining devices that could have a blank dma_mask > are platform devices instantiated from board files. > > These are mostly used on systems without CONFIG_HIGHMEM > enabled which means the block layer will not bounce, and in > the few cases where it is enabled it is not used anyway: > for example some OMAP2 systems such as Nokia n800/n810 will > create a platform_device and not assign a dma_mask, however > they do not have any highmem, so no bouncing will happen > anyway: the block core checks if max_low_pfn >= max_pfn > and this will always be false. > > Should it turn out there is a platform_device with blank > DMA mask actually using CONFIG_HIGHMEM somewhere out there > we should set dma_mask for it, not do this trickery. > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Applied for next, thanks! Kind regards Uffe > --- > drivers/mmc/core/queue.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c > index a0a2412f62a7..316415588a77 100644 > --- a/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c > +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/queue.c > @@ -351,8 +351,6 @@ static void mmc_setup_queue(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct mmc_card *card) > if (mmc_can_erase(card)) > mmc_queue_setup_discard(mq->queue, card); > > - if (!mmc_dev(host)->dma_mask || !*mmc_dev(host)->dma_mask) > - blk_queue_bounce_limit(mq->queue, BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH); > blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(mq->queue, > min(host->max_blk_count, host->max_req_size / 512)); > if (host->can_dma_map_merge) > > --- > base-commit: 6613476e225e090cc9aad49be7fa504e290dd33d > change-id: 20240124-mmc-no-blk-bounce-high-d84e8898c707 > > Best regards, > -- > Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >
From the block POV: awesome, Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, at 09:50, Linus Walleij wrote:
> The MMC core sets BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH for devices where dma_mask
> is unassigned.
>
> For the majority of MMC hosts this path is never taken: the
> OF core will unconditionally assign a 32-bit mask to any
> OF device, and most MMC hosts are probed from device tree,
> see drivers/of/platform.c:
>
> of_platform_device_create_pdata()
> dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> if (!dev->dev.dma_mask)
> dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>
> of_amba_device_create()
> dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
> dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
>
> MMC devices that are probed from ACPI or PCI will likewise
> have a proper dma_mask assigned.
>
> The only remaining devices that could have a blank dma_mask
> are platform devices instantiated from board files.
>
> These are mostly used on systems without CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> enabled which means the block layer will not bounce, and in
> the few cases where it is enabled it is not used anyway:
> for example some OMAP2 systems such as Nokia n800/n810 will
> create a platform_device and not assign a dma_mask, however
> they do not have any highmem, so no bouncing will happen
> anyway: the block core checks if max_low_pfn >= max_pfn
> and this will always be false.
>
> Should it turn out there is a platform_device with blank
> DMA mask actually using CONFIG_HIGHMEM somewhere out there
> we should set dma_mask for it, not do this trickery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
I think it's worth mentioning the cb710 example here, which
uses a platform device as a child of a PCI device and
does not assign a DMA mask nor use DMA.
This one will see a change in behavior, meaning that the
blockdev buffers are no longer bounced. As far as I can
tell, this is fine because the driver appears to correctly
use the sg_iter infrastructure for mapping data pages,
but it would be good to have this confirmed by
Michał Mirosław because this code path has probably never
been tested without BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH.
Adding Michał to Cc.
Arnd
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:47:26AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, at 09:50, Linus Walleij wrote: > > The MMC core sets BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH for devices where dma_mask > > is unassigned. > > > > For the majority of MMC hosts this path is never taken: the > > OF core will unconditionally assign a 32-bit mask to any > > OF device, and most MMC hosts are probed from device tree, > > see drivers/of/platform.c: > > > > of_platform_device_create_pdata() > > dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > > if (!dev->dev.dma_mask) > > dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask; > > > > of_amba_device_create() > > dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32); > > dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask; > > > > MMC devices that are probed from ACPI or PCI will likewise > > have a proper dma_mask assigned. > > > > The only remaining devices that could have a blank dma_mask > > are platform devices instantiated from board files. > > > > These are mostly used on systems without CONFIG_HIGHMEM > > enabled which means the block layer will not bounce, and in > > the few cases where it is enabled it is not used anyway: > > for example some OMAP2 systems such as Nokia n800/n810 will > > create a platform_device and not assign a dma_mask, however > > they do not have any highmem, so no bouncing will happen > > anyway: the block core checks if max_low_pfn >= max_pfn > > and this will always be false. > > > > Should it turn out there is a platform_device with blank > > DMA mask actually using CONFIG_HIGHMEM somewhere out there > > we should set dma_mask for it, not do this trickery. > > > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > I think it's worth mentioning the cb710 example here, which > uses a platform device as a child of a PCI device and > does not assign a DMA mask nor use DMA. > > This one will see a change in behavior, meaning that the > blockdev buffers are no longer bounced. As far as I can > tell, this is fine because the driver appears to correctly > use the sg_iter infrastructure for mapping data pages, > but it would be good to have this confirmed by > Michał Mirosław because this code path has probably never > been tested without BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH. Hi, this driver doesn't do DMA at all, so having DMA mask set or not it should be good as long as the CPU can read/write the buffers. Best Regards Michał Mirosław
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:35 PM Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> wrote: > > I think it's worth mentioning the cb710 example here, which > > uses a platform device as a child of a PCI device and > > does not assign a DMA mask nor use DMA. > > > > This one will see a change in behavior, meaning that the > > blockdev buffers are no longer bounced. As far as I can > > tell, this is fine because the driver appears to correctly > > use the sg_iter infrastructure for mapping data pages, > > but it would be good to have this confirmed by > > Michał Mirosław because this code path has probably never > > been tested without BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH. > > Hi, this driver doesn't do DMA at all, so having DMA mask set or not > it should be good as long as the CPU can read/write the buffers. The only difference is where the CPU have to read/write the buffers really, before the change those were all guaranteed to be in lowmem (bounced there by the block core), now they can also be in highmem, but sg_miter will deal with it for sure. Yours, Linus Wallej
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.