For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with
xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header
information back when creating the skb.
Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev,
if (unlikely(!skb))
goto err;
+ /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */
+ memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len);
+
if (metasize)
skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize);
@@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev,
head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz);
if (unlikely(!head_skb))
break;
+ /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */
+ memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len);
+
return head_skb;
case XDP_TX:
--
2.40.1
在 2024/1/24 下午4:57, Liang Chen 写道: > For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with > xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header > information back when creating the skb. > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > if (unlikely(!skb)) > goto err; > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); If xdp push or xdp pull modifies xdp_buff, will the original header still apply to the modified data? Thanks, Heng > + > if (metasize) > skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize); > > @@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz); > if (unlikely(!head_skb)) > break; > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > + > return head_skb; > > case XDP_TX:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 7:04 PM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > 在 2024/1/24 下午4:57, Liang Chen 写道: > > For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with > > xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header > > information back when creating the skb. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > if (unlikely(!skb)) > > goto err; > > > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > If xdp push or xdp pull modifies xdp_buff, will the original header > still apply to the modified data? > No, it would be an issue then. Anyway, this patch will be dropped in v3. Thanks. > Thanks, > Heng > > > + > > if (metasize) > > skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize); > > > > @@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz); > > if (unlikely(!head_skb)) > > break; > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > + > > return head_skb; > > > > case XDP_TX: >
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:57:20 +0800, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with > xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header > information back when creating the skb. > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > if (unlikely(!skb)) > goto err; > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); About this, a spec is waiting for voting. This may change the logic of the csum offset and so on. Please not do this. Thanks. > + > if (metasize) > skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize); > > @@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz); > if (unlikely(!head_skb)) > break; > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > + > return head_skb; > > case XDP_TX: > -- > 2.40.1 >
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:16 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:57:20 +0800, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with > > xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header > > information back when creating the skb. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > if (unlikely(!skb)) > > goto err; > > > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > About this, a spec is waiting for voting. > > This may change the logic of the csum offset and so on. > > Please not do this. > Sure. This will be dropped in v3. Thanks. > Thanks. > > > > + > > if (metasize) > > skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize); > > > > @@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz); > > if (unlikely(!head_skb)) > > break; > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > + > > return head_skb; > > > > case XDP_TX: > > -- > > 2.40.1 > >
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:16 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:57:20 +0800, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with > > xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header > > information back when creating the skb. > > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++ > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > if (unlikely(!skb)) > > goto err; > > > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > About this, a spec is waiting for voting. > A pointer? > This may change the logic of the csum offset and so on. Btw, doesn't it need a new feature bit? Thanks > > Please not do this. > > Thanks. > > > > + > > if (metasize) > > skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize); > > > > @@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz); > > if (unlikely(!head_skb)) > > break; > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > + > > return head_skb; > > > > case XDP_TX: > > -- > > 2.40.1 > > >
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 11:48:18 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 5:16 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:57:20 +0800, Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> wrote: > > > For the XDP_PASS scenario of the XDP path, the skb constructed with > > > xdp_buff does not include the virtio header. Adding the virtio header > > > information back when creating the skb. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 6 ++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index b56828804e5f..2de46eb4c661 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -1270,6 +1270,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > > if (unlikely(!skb)) > > > goto err; > > > > > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > > > About this, a spec is waiting for voting. > > > > A pointer? Sorry. http://lore.kernel.org/all/1704263702-50528-1-git-send-email-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com > > > This may change the logic of the csum offset and so on. > > Btw, doesn't it need a new feature bit? Yes. But this patch set should not include this. We may do the similar thing, but the commit log will include more info about the spec. Thanks. > > Thanks > > > > > Please not do this. > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > + > > > if (metasize) > > > skb_metadata_set(skb, metasize); > > > > > > @@ -1635,6 +1638,9 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable_xdp(struct net_device *dev, > > > head_skb = build_skb_from_xdp_buff(dev, vi, xdp, xdp_frags_truesz); > > > if (unlikely(!head_skb)) > > > break; > > > + /* Store the original virtio header for subsequent use by the driver. */ > > > + memcpy(skb_vnet_common_hdr(head_skb), &virtnet_xdp.hdr, vi->hdr_len); > > > + > > > return head_skb; > > > > > > case XDP_TX: > > > -- > > > 2.40.1 > > > > > >
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.