arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g2.dtsi | 37 ++++++++++++++++++- .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts | 6 ++- .../boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts | 6 ++- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@nxp.com> This patchset adds device tree support for S32G2 SCMI firmware and uSDHC node. The SCMI clock IDs are based on a downstream version of the TF-A stored on GitHub [0]. I can send the patches individually if you prefer that instead of submitting them all at once.?? [0] https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/arm-trusted-firmware Changes in v2: - The SCMI clock bindings header has been removed. Ghennadi Procopciuc (2): arm64: dts: s32g: add SCMI firmware node arm64: dts: s32g: add uSDHC node arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g2.dtsi | 37 ++++++++++++++++++- .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts | 6 ++- .../boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts | 6 ++- 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:05:59PM +0200, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote: > From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@nxp.com> > > This patchset adds device tree support for S32G2 SCMI firmware and uSDHC > node. The SCMI clock IDs are based on a downstream version of the TF-A > stored on GitHub [0]. > > I can send the patches individually if you prefer that instead of > submitting them all at once.?? > > [0] https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/arm-trusted-firmware > > Changes in v2: > - The SCMI clock bindings header has been removed. > > Ghennadi Procopciuc (2): > arm64: dts: s32g: add SCMI firmware node > arm64: dts: s32g: add uSDHC node Applied both, thanks!
On 1/22/24 16:05, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote: > From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@nxp.com> > > This patchset adds device tree support for S32G2 SCMI firmware and uSDHC > node. The SCMI clock IDs are based on a downstream version of the TF-A > stored on GitHub [0]. > > I can send the patches individually if you prefer that instead of > submitting them all at once.?? > > [0] https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/arm-trusted-firmware > > Changes in v2: > - The SCMI clock bindings header has been removed. > > Ghennadi Procopciuc (2): > arm64: dts: s32g: add SCMI firmware node > arm64: dts: s32g: add uSDHC node > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g2.dtsi | 37 ++++++++++++++++++- > .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts | 6 ++- > .../boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts | 6 ++- > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Hi Chester, I want to confirm if you are open to accepting the proposed changes for ARM/NXP S32G architecture, given your maintainer role. Please let me know if any revisions or adaptations are required. Regards, Ghennadi
Hi, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote: > On 1/22/24 16:05, Ghennadi Procopciuc wrote: > > From: Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@nxp.com> > > > > This patchset adds device tree support for S32G2 SCMI firmware and uSDHC > > node. The SCMI clock IDs are based on a downstream version of the TF-A > > stored on GitHub [0]. > > > > I can send the patches individually if you prefer that instead of > > submitting them all at once.?? > > > > [0] https://github.com/nxp-auto-linux/arm-trusted-firmware > > > > Changes in v2: > > - The SCMI clock bindings header has been removed. > > > > Ghennadi Procopciuc (2): > > arm64: dts: s32g: add SCMI firmware node > > arm64: dts: s32g: add uSDHC node > > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g2.dtsi | 37 ++++++++++++++++++- > > .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-evb.dts | 6 ++- > > .../boot/dts/freescale/s32g274a-rdb2.dts | 6 ++- > > 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > Hi Chester, > > I want to confirm if you are open to accepting the proposed changes for > ARM/NXP S32G architecture, given your maintainer role. Please let me > know if any revisions or adaptations are required. > These patches look good to me. Hi Shawn, Per the discussion in another thread, could you help to apply these two through the imx tree? Thanks! Chester > Regards, > Ghennadi >
On 3/2/24 04:01, Chester Lin wrote: [...] > Hi Shawn, > > Per the discussion in another thread, could you help to apply these two > through the imx tree? Thanks! > > Chester Hi Shawn, I noticed that Chester's email was sent to you as a CC recipient, which may cause it to be filtered out based on your inbox rules. This is why I wanted to bring this thread to your attention and kindly ask you to confirm whether these patches will be pulled through the imx tree. Regards, Ghennadi
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.