arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
rcu_cpu_starting() must be called before clockevents_register_device() to avoid
the following lockdep splat triggered by calling list_add() when
CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:
WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
...
-----------------------------
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3680 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
...
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8012a434>] show_stack+0x64/0x158
[<ffffffff80a93d98>] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xc4
[<ffffffff801c9e9c>] __lock_acquire+0x1404/0x2940
[<ffffffff801cbf3c>] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x448
[<ffffffff80aa4260>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x88
[<ffffffff8021e0c8>] clockevents_register_device+0x60/0x1e8
[<ffffffff80130ff0>] r4k_clockevent_init+0x220/0x3a0
[<ffffffff801339d0>] start_secondary+0x50/0x3b8
raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.
See also commit 29368e093921 ("x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier"),
commit de5d9dae150c ("s390/smp: move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") and commit
99f070b62322 ("powerpc/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier").
Signed-off-by: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
---
arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
index 8fbef537fb88..81f6c4f8fbc1 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp.c
@@ -351,10 +351,11 @@ early_initcall(mips_smp_ipi_init);
*/
asmlinkage void start_secondary(void)
{
- unsigned int cpu;
+ unsigned int cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
cpu_probe();
per_cpu_trap_init(false);
+ rcu_cpu_starting(cpu);
mips_clockevent_init();
mp_ops->init_secondary();
cpu_report();
@@ -366,7 +367,6 @@ asmlinkage void start_secondary(void)
*/
calibrate_delay();
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
cpu_data[cpu].udelay_val = loops_per_jiffy;
set_cpu_sibling_map(cpu);
--
2.42.0
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 05:38:11PM +0100, Stefan Wiehler wrote:
> rcu_cpu_starting() must be called before clockevents_register_device() to avoid
> the following lockdep splat triggered by calling list_add() when
> CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:
>
> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> ...
> -----------------------------
> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3680 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> no locks held by swapper/1/0.
> ...
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8012a434>] show_stack+0x64/0x158
> [<ffffffff80a93d98>] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xc4
> [<ffffffff801c9e9c>] __lock_acquire+0x1404/0x2940
> [<ffffffff801cbf3c>] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x448
> [<ffffffff80aa4260>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x88
> [<ffffffff8021e0c8>] clockevents_register_device+0x60/0x1e8
> [<ffffffff80130ff0>] r4k_clockevent_init+0x220/0x3a0
> [<ffffffff801339d0>] start_secondary+0x50/0x3b8
>
> raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
> before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.
>
> See also commit 29368e093921 ("x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier"),
> commit de5d9dae150c ("s390/smp: move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") and commit
> 99f070b62322 ("powerpc/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier").
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@nokia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree? What
kernel(s) should this be applied to?
thanks,
greg k-h
On 1/19/2024 10:38 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 05:38:11PM +0100, Stefan Wiehler wrote:
>> rcu_cpu_starting() must be called before clockevents_register_device() to avoid
>> the following lockdep splat triggered by calling list_add() when
>> CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:
>>
>> WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
>> ...
>> -----------------------------
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3680 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
>>
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>
>> RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
>> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
>> no locks held by swapper/1/0.
>> ...
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff8012a434>] show_stack+0x64/0x158
>> [<ffffffff80a93d98>] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xc4
>> [<ffffffff801c9e9c>] __lock_acquire+0x1404/0x2940
>> [<ffffffff801cbf3c>] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x448
>> [<ffffffff80aa4260>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x88
>> [<ffffffff8021e0c8>] clockevents_register_device+0x60/0x1e8
>> [<ffffffff80130ff0>] r4k_clockevent_init+0x220/0x3a0
>> [<ffffffff801339d0>] start_secondary+0x50/0x3b8
>>
>> raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
>> before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.
>>
>> See also commit 29368e093921 ("x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier"),
>> commit de5d9dae150c ("s390/smp: move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") and commit
>> 99f070b62322 ("powerpc/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@nokia.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
>> ---
>> arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree? What
> kernel(s) should this be applied to?
The upstream commit is 55702ec9603ebeffb15e6f7b113623fe1d8872f4
("mips/smp: Call rcutree_report_cpu_starting() earlier") and this change
from Stefan should be applied to both the 6.1 stable and 6.6 stable
branches. Thanks!
--
Florian
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 08:52:55AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 1/19/2024 10:38 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 05:38:11PM +0100, Stefan Wiehler wrote:
> > > rcu_cpu_starting() must be called before clockevents_register_device() to avoid
> > > the following lockdep splat triggered by calling list_add() when
> > > CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y:
> > >
> > > WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
> > > ...
> > > -----------------------------
> > > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3680 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
> > >
> > > other info that might help us debug this:
> > >
> > > RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
> > > rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
> > > no locks held by swapper/1/0.
> > > ...
> > > Call Trace:
> > > [<ffffffff8012a434>] show_stack+0x64/0x158
> > > [<ffffffff80a93d98>] dump_stack_lvl+0x90/0xc4
> > > [<ffffffff801c9e9c>] __lock_acquire+0x1404/0x2940
> > > [<ffffffff801cbf3c>] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x448
> > > [<ffffffff80aa4260>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x88
> > > [<ffffffff8021e0c8>] clockevents_register_device+0x60/0x1e8
> > > [<ffffffff80130ff0>] r4k_clockevent_init+0x220/0x3a0
> > > [<ffffffff801339d0>] start_secondary+0x50/0x3b8
> > >
> > > raw_smp_processor_id() is required in order to avoid calling into lockdep
> > > before RCU has declared the CPU to be watched for readers.
> > >
> > > See also commit 29368e093921 ("x86/smpboot: Move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier"),
> > > commit de5d9dae150c ("s390/smp: move rcu_cpu_starting() earlier") and commit
> > > 99f070b62322 ("powerpc/smp: Call rcu_cpu_starting() earlier").
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Wiehler <stefan.wiehler@nokia.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
> > > ---
> > > arch/mips/kernel/smp.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > What is the git commit id of this change in Linus's tree? What
> > kernel(s) should this be applied to?
>
> The upstream commit is 55702ec9603ebeffb15e6f7b113623fe1d8872f4 ("mips/smp:
> Call rcutree_report_cpu_starting() earlier") and this change from Stefan
> should be applied to both the 6.1 stable and 6.6 stable branches. Thanks!
Thanks, now queued up.
greg k-h
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.