arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
Signed-off-by: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
---
Changes in v5:
- Rephrased commit text, replaced qcs6490-idp to qcm6490-idp.
- Removed the unnecessary full.
- Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240112-lpg-v4-1-c4004026686b@quicinc.com
Changes in v4:
- Removed "label" definition and added "function" definition.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215-lpg-v3-1-4e2db0c6df5f@quicinc.com
Changes in v3:
- Rephrased commit text and updated the nodes to qcm6490-idp board file.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231110-qcom_leds-v2-1-3cad1fbbc65a@quicinc.com/
Changes in v2:
- Rephrased commit text and updated the nodes to board file.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108-qcom_leds-v1-1-c3e1c8572cb0@quicinc.com
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
index 37c91fdf3ab9..8268fad505e7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
/dts-v1/;
+#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
#include "sc7280.dtsi"
#include "pm7325.dtsi"
@@ -414,6 +415,28 @@ vreg_bob_3p296: bob {
};
};
+&pm8350c_pwm {
+ function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ led@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+ };
+
+ led@2 {
+ reg = <2>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
+ };
+
+ led@3 {
+ reg = <3>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
+ };
+};
+
&qupv3_id_0 {
status = "okay";
};
---
base-commit: 17cb8a20bde66a520a2ca7aad1063e1ce7382240
change-id: 20231215-lpg-4aadd374811a
Best regards,
--
Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
<devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>
> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next
iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not
the best idea.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Rephrased commit text, replaced qcs6490-idp to qcm6490-idp.
> - Removed the unnecessary full.
> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240112-lpg-v4-1-c4004026686b@quicinc.com
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Removed "label" definition and added "function" definition.
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215-lpg-v3-1-4e2db0c6df5f@quicinc.com
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Rephrased commit text and updated the nodes to qcm6490-idp board file.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231110-qcom_leds-v2-1-3cad1fbbc65a@quicinc.com/
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Rephrased commit text and updated the nodes to board file.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108-qcom_leds-v1-1-c3e1c8572cb0@quicinc.com
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> index 37c91fdf3ab9..8268fad505e7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>
> /dts-v1/;
>
> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
> #include "sc7280.dtsi"
> #include "pm7325.dtsi"
> @@ -414,6 +415,28 @@ vreg_bob_3p296: bob {
> };
> };
>
> +&pm8350c_pwm {
> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + led@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
> + };
> +
> + led@2 {
> + reg = <2>;
> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> + };
> +
> + led@3 {
> + reg = <3>;
> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> &qupv3_id_0 {
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> ---
> base-commit: 17cb8a20bde66a520a2ca7aad1063e1ce7382240
> change-id: 20231215-lpg-4aadd374811a
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>
>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>
> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next
> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not
> the best idea.
Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no consumer to
use the function config, do we need to add now?
pm8350c_pwm {
+ function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ led@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+ function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+ };
+ ...
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Rephrased commit text, replaced qcs6490-idp to qcm6490-idp.
>> - Removed the unnecessary full.
>> - Link to v4: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240112-lpg-v4-1-c4004026686b@quicinc.com
>>
>> Changes in v4:
>> - Removed "label" definition and added "function" definition.
>> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215-lpg-v3-1-4e2db0c6df5f@quicinc.com
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Rephrased commit text and updated the nodes to qcm6490-idp board file.
>> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231110-qcom_leds-v2-1-3cad1fbbc65a@quicinc.com/
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Rephrased commit text and updated the nodes to board file.
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231108-qcom_leds-v1-1-c3e1c8572cb0@quicinc.com
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>> index 37c91fdf3ab9..8268fad505e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcm6490-idp.dts
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>>
>> /dts-v1/;
>>
>> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
>> #include "sc7280.dtsi"
>> #include "pm7325.dtsi"
>> @@ -414,6 +415,28 @@ vreg_bob_3p296: bob {
>> };
>> };
>>
>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + led@1 {
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + led@2 {
>> + reg = <2>;
>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + led@3 {
>> + reg = <3>;
>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
>> + };
>> +};
>> +
>> &qupv3_id_0 {
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: 17cb8a20bde66a520a2ca7aad1063e1ce7382240
>> change-id: 20231215-lpg-4aadd374811a
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>
>>
>
>
On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote: > > > On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay >> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote: >>> >>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> >>> >>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can >>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver. >> >> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next >> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not >> the best idea. > Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no consumer to > use the function config, do we need to add now? Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for your Makefile target). Best regards, Krzysztof
On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>>>
>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next
>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not
>>> the best idea.
>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no consumer to
>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
>
> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for your
> Makefile target).
I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
+&pm8350c_pwm {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ led@1 {
+ reg = <1>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+ function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+ };
+
+ led@2 {
+ reg = <2>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
+ function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+ };
+
+ led@3 {
+ reg = <3>;
+ color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
+ function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
+ };
+};
+
Thanks,
Hui
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
> >>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
> >>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
> >>>
> >>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next
> >>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not
> >>> the best idea.
> >> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no consumer to
> >> use the function config, do we need to add now?
> >
> > Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for your
> > Makefile target).
> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
of multi-led with three components?
>
> +&pm8350c_pwm {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + led@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> + };
> +
> + led@2 {
> + reg = <2>;
> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> + };
> +
> + led@3 {
> + reg = <3>;
> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> + };
> +};
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 1/17/2024 11:41 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
>>>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>>>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>>>>>
>>>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next
>>>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not
>>>>> the best idea.
>>>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no consumer to
>>>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
>>>
>>> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for your
>>> Makefile target).
>> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
>> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
>
> Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
> of multi-led with three components?
In the HW design, they are three seprete LEDs, there are three LEDs on
device. why do we need to add for multi-led?
Thanks,
Hui
>
>>
>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + led@1 {
>> + reg = <1>;
>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>> + };
>> +
>> + led@2 {
>> + reg = <2>;
>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>> + };
>> +
>> + led@3 {
>> + reg = <3>;
>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>> + };
>> +};
>
>
>
On 1/18/2024 10:06 AM, hui liu wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/2024 11:41 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
>>>>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>>>>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the next
>>>>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is not
>>>>>> the best idea.
>>>>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no consumer to
>>>>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
>>>>
>>>> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for your
>>>> Makefile target).
>>> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
>>> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
>>
>> Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
>> of multi-led with three components?
>
Hi Dmitry,
If there is no other issue, can I push the V6?
Thanks,
Hui
> In the HW design, they are three seprete LEDs, there are three LEDs on
> device. why do we need to add for multi-led?
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>>
>>>
>>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + led@1 {
>>> + reg = <1>;
>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + led@2 {
>>> + reg = <2>;
>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + led@3 {
>>> + reg = <3>;
>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>> + };
>>> +};
>>
>>
>>
On 1/22/2024 1:42 PM, hui liu wrote:
>
>
> On 1/18/2024 10:06 AM, hui liu wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/17/2024 11:41 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
>>>>>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>>>>>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the
>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> the best idea.
>>>>>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no
>>>>>> consumer to
>>>>>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
>>>>>
>>>>> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for
>>>>> your
>>>>> Makefile target).
>>>> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
>>>> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
>>>
>>> Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
>>> of multi-led with three components?
>
>> In the HW design, they are three seprete LEDs, there are three LEDs on
>> device. why do we need to add for multi-led?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
I double confirmed the HW design, for IDP devcie, we should set it to
multi led, for another similar device(RB3-GEN2, I will push LED change
for this device later), it should be set to seperate LED.
They are different, so I will push V6 to set it for multi-led for
QCM6490-IDP device. Thanks for your review.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>> +
>>>> + led@1 {
>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
>>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + led@2 {
>>>> + reg = <2>;
>>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
>>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + led@3 {
>>>> + reg = <3>;
>>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
>>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>> + };
>>>> +};
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 08:26, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/22/2024 1:42 PM, hui liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/18/2024 10:06 AM, hui liu wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/17/2024 11:41 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>>>> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
> >>>>>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
> >>>>>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the
> >>>>>>> next
> >>>>>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is
> >>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>> the best idea.
> >>>>>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no
> >>>>>> consumer to
> >>>>>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for
> >>>>> your
> >>>>> Makefile target).
> >>>> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
> >>>> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
> >>>
> >>> Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
> >>> of multi-led with three components?
> >
> >> In the HW design, they are three seprete LEDs, there are three LEDs on
> >> device. why do we need to add for multi-led?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Hui
>
> I double confirmed the HW design, for IDP devcie, we should set it to
> multi led, for another similar device(RB3-GEN2, I will push LED change
> for this device later), it should be set to seperate LED.
> They are different, so I will push V6 to set it for multi-led for
> QCM6490-IDP device. Thanks for your review.
Ack, thank you.
>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
> >>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>>> + status = "okay";
> >>>> +
> >>>> + led@1 {
> >>>> + reg = <1>;
> >>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
> >>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> +
> >>>> + led@2 {
> >>>> + reg = <2>;
> >>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
> >>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> +
> >>>> + led@3 {
> >>>> + reg = <3>;
> >>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
> >>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
> >>>> + };
> >>>> +};
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
On 1/22/2024 9:37 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 08:26, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/22/2024 1:42 PM, hui liu wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/18/2024 10:06 AM, hui liu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/17/2024 11:41 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 05:02, hui liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/15/2024 6:26 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 15/01/2024 11:18, hui liu wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/15/2024 5:56 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 11:48, Hui Liu via B4 Relay
>>>>>>>>> <devnull+quic_huliu.quicinc.com@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> From: Hui Liu <quic_huliu@quicinc.com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Add definition for three LEDs to make sure they can
>>>>>>>>>> be enabled base on QCOM LPG LED driver.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The "function" property is still placed incorrectly. Posting the
>>>>>>>>> next
>>>>>>>>> iteration before concluding the discussion on the previous one is
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> the best idea.
>>>>>>>> Do you mean I should update it as below? Seems there is no
>>>>>>>> consumer to
>>>>>>>> use the function config, do we need to add now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paste the output of dtbs_check for your board (or CHECK_DTBS=y for
>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>> Makefile target).
>>>>>> I checked the dt-binding file of LPG LED, I will update the dts as
>>>>>> below, if you think it's correct, I will push v6.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any reason why you are defining three different LEDs instead
>>>>> of multi-led with three components?
>>>
>>>> In the HW design, they are three seprete LEDs, there are three LEDs on
>>>> device. why do we need to add for multi-led?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Hui
>>
>> I double confirmed the HW design, for IDP devcie, we should set it to
>> multi led, for another similar device(RB3-GEN2, I will push LED change
>> for this device later), it should be set to seperate LED.
>> They are different, so I will push V6 to set it for multi-led for
>> QCM6490-IDP device. Thanks for your review.
>
> Ack, thank you.
Hi Dmitry,
Could you give the approval for V6?
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240126-lpg-v6-1-f879cecbce69@quicinc.com/
Thanks,
Hui
>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +&pm8350c_pwm {
>>>>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>>>>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + led@1 {
>>>>>> + reg = <1>;
>>>>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
>>>>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + led@2 {
>>>>>> + reg = <2>;
>>>>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
>>>>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + led@3 {
>>>>>> + reg = <3>;
>>>>>> + color = <LED_COLOR_ID_BLUE>;
>>>>>> + function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.