Makefile | 4 ++-- fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 9 ++------- fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 8 +------- fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +- include/net/dst_ops.h | 2 +- net/core/dst.c | 8 ++------ net/ipv6/route.c | 13 +++++-------- 8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 6.1.73-rc1
Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>
ipv6: remove max_size check inline with ipv4
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Revert "nfsd: separate nfsd_last_thread() from nfsd_put()"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Revert "nfsd: call nfsd_last_thread() before final nfsd_put()"
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
cifs: fix flushing folio regression for 6.1 backport
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
fs/nfsd/nfsctl.c | 9 ++-------
fs/nfsd/nfsd.h | 8 +-------
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c | 2 +-
include/net/dst_ops.h | 2 +-
net/core/dst.c | 8 ++------
net/ipv6/route.c | 13 +++++--------
8 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > Compiled and booted on my x86_64 and ARM64 test systems. No errors or regressions. Tested-by: Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com> Thanks.
On 1/13/2024 1:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on BMIPS_GENERIC: Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com> -- Florian
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:50:38AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. It may be too late, but Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Cheers, Conor.
On Saturday, January 13, 2024 15:20 IST, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > Please find the KernelCI report for this week :- ## stable-rc HEAD for linux-6.1.y: Date: 2024-01-13 https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/log/?h=ccaabe94627897d3e2d2234aa6b2196c32a63325 ## Build failures: No build failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/ ## Boot failures: No **new** boot failures seen for the stable-rc/linux-6.1.y commit head \o/ Tested-by: kernelci.org bot <bot@kernelci.org> Thanks, Shreeya Patel
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
All tests passing for Tegra ...
Test results for stable-v6.1:
10 builds: 10 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
116 tests: 116 pass, 0 fail
Linux version: 6.1.73-rc1-gccaabe946278
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra194-p3509-0000+p3668-0000,
tegra20-ventana, tegra210-p2371-2180,
tegra210-p3450-0000, tegra30-cardhu-a04
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Jon
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 15:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Results from Linaro’s test farm. No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386. Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org> ## Build * kernel: 6.1.73-rc1 * git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc * git branch: linux-6.1.y * git commit: ccaabe94627897d3e2d2234aa6b2196c32a63325 * git describe: v6.1.72-5-gccaabe946278 * test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-6.1.y/build/v6.1.72-5-gccaabe946278/ ## Test Regressions (compared to v6.1.71) ## Metric Regressions (compared to v6.1.71) ## Test Fixes (compared to v6.1.71) ## Metric Fixes (compared to v6.1.71) ## Test result summary total: 253149, pass: 214510, fail: 4787, skip: 33543, xfail: 309 ## Build Summary * arc: 5 total, 5 passed, 0 failed * arm: 151 total, 150 passed, 1 failed * arm64: 52 total, 52 passed, 0 failed * i386: 39 total, 39 passed, 0 failed * mips: 26 total, 26 passed, 0 failed * parisc: 4 total, 4 passed, 0 failed * powerpc: 36 total, 36 passed, 0 failed * riscv: 15 total, 14 passed, 1 failed * s390: 16 total, 16 passed, 0 failed * sh: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed * sparc: 8 total, 8 passed, 0 failed * x86_64: 46 total, 46 passed, 0 failed ## Test suites summary * boot * kselftest-android * kselftest-arm64 * kselftest-breakpoints * kselftest-capabilities * kselftest-cgroup * kselftest-clone3 * kselftest-core * kselftest-cpu-hotplug * kselftest-cpufreq * kselftest-drivers-dma-buf * kselftest-efivarfs * kselftest-exec * kselftest-filesystems * kselftest-filesystems-binderfs * kselftest-filesystems-epoll * kselftest-firmware * kselftest-fpu * kselftest-ftrace * kselftest-futex * kselftest-gpio * kselftest-intel_pstate * kselftest-ipc * kselftest-ir * kselftest-kcmp * kselftest-kexec * kselftest-kvm * kselftest-lib * kselftest-membarrier * kselftest-memfd * kselftest-memory-hotplug * kselftest-mincore * kselftest-mount * kselftest-mqueue * kselftest-net * kselftest-net-forwarding * kselftest-net-mptcp * kselftest-netfilter * kselftest-nsfs * kselftest-openat2 * kselftest-pid_namespace * kselftest-pidfd * kselftest-proc * kselftest-pstore * kselftest-ptrace * kselftest-rseq * kselftest-rtc * kselftest-seccomp * kselftest-sigaltstack * kselftest-size * kselftest-splice * kselftest-static_keys * kselftest-sync * kselftest-sysctl * kselftest-tc-testing * kselftest-timens * kselftest-tmpfs * kselftest-tpm2 * kselftest-user * kselftest-user_events * kselftest-vDSO * kselftest-vm * kselftest-x86 * kselftest-zram * kunit * libgpiod * log-parser-boot * log-parser-test * ltp-cap_bounds * ltp-commands * ltp-containers * ltp-controllers * ltp-cpuhotplug * ltp-crypto * ltp-cve * ltp-dio * ltp-fcntl-locktests * ltp-filecaps * ltp-fs * ltp-fs_bind * ltp-fs_perms_simple * ltp-fsx * ltp-hugetlb * ltp-io * ltp-ipc * ltp-math * ltp-mm * ltp-nptl * ltp-pty * ltp-sched * ltp-securebits * ltp-smoke * ltp-syscalls * ltp-tracing * network-basic-tests * perf * rcutorture * v4l2-compliance -- Linaro LKFT https://lkft.linaro.org
> On Jan 13, 2024, at 4:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. Hi, 6.1.73-rc1 compiled and booted just fine on x86_64, no errors or regressions. Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@sladewatkins.net> Best, Slade
On 1/13/24 1:50 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release. > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz > or in the git tree and branch at: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y > and the diffstat can be found below. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched). Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
Hi!
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CIP testing did not find any problems here:
https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-testing/linux-stable-rc-ci/-/tree/linux-6.1.y
Tested-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@denx.de>
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Hello,
On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 10:50:38 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.73 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon, 15 Jan 2024 09:41:55 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v6.x/stable-review/patch-6.1.73-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-6.1.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
This rc kernel passes DAMON functionality test[1] on my test machine.
Attaching the test results summary below. Please note that I retrieved the
kernel from linux-stable-rc tree[2].
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
[1] https://github.com/awslabs/damon-tests/tree/next/corr
[2] ccaabe946278 ("Linux 6.1.73-rc1")
Thanks,
SJ
[...]
---
ok 1 selftests: damon: debugfs_attrs.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon: debugfs_schemes.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon: debugfs_target_ids.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon: debugfs_empty_targets.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon: debugfs_huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon: debugfs_duplicate_context_creation.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon: sysfs.sh
ok 1 selftests: damon-tests: kunit.sh
ok 2 selftests: damon-tests: huge_count_read_write.sh
ok 3 selftests: damon-tests: buffer_overflow.sh
ok 4 selftests: damon-tests: rm_contexts.sh
ok 5 selftests: damon-tests: record_null_deref.sh
ok 6 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_read_before_terminate_race.sh
ok 7 selftests: damon-tests: dbgfs_target_ids_pid_leak.sh
ok 8 selftests: damon-tests: damo_tests.sh
ok 9 selftests: damon-tests: masim-record.sh
ok 10 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386.sh
ok 11 selftests: damon-tests: build_arm64.sh
ok 12 selftests: damon-tests: build_m68k.sh
ok 13 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_idle_flag.sh
ok 14 selftests: damon-tests: build_i386_highpte.sh
ok 15 selftests: damon-tests: build_nomemcg.sh
[33m
[92mPASS [39m
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.