Fields named "wait_list" usually are of type "struct list_head". To
avoid confusion and because it is of type
"Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>" we are renaming "wait_list" to
"wait_queue_head".

Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
---
 rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs b/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs
index b679b6f6dbeb..ea0d559fbde5 100644
--- a/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs
+++ b/rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ macro_rules! new_condvar {
 #[pin_data]
 pub struct CondVar {
     #[pin]
-    pub(crate) wait_list: Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>,
+    pub(crate) wait_queue_head: Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>,
 
     /// A condvar needs to be pinned because it contains a [`struct list_head`] that is
     /// self-referential, so it cannot be safely moved once it is initialised.
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ pub fn new(name: &'static CStr, key: &'static LockClassKey) -> impl PinInit<Self
             _pin: PhantomPinned,
             // SAFETY: `slot` is valid while the closure is called and both `name` and `key` have
             // static lifetimes so they live indefinitely.
-            wait_list <- Opaque::ffi_init(|slot| unsafe {
+            wait_queue_head <- Opaque::ffi_init(|slot| unsafe {
                 bindings::__init_waitqueue_head(slot, name.as_char_ptr(), key.as_ptr())
             }),
         })
@@ -108,16 +108,20 @@ fn wait_internal<T: ?Sized, B: Backend>(&self, wait_state: u32, guard: &mut Guar
         // SAFETY: `wait` points to valid memory.
         unsafe { bindings::init_wait(wait.get()) };
 
-        // SAFETY: Both `wait` and `wait_list` point to valid memory.
+        // SAFETY: Both `wait` and `wait_queue_head` point to valid memory.
         unsafe {
-            bindings::prepare_to_wait_exclusive(self.wait_list.get(), wait.get(), wait_state as _)
+            bindings::prepare_to_wait_exclusive(
+                self.wait_queue_head.get(),
+                wait.get(),
+                wait_state as _,
+            )
         };
 
         // SAFETY: No arguments, switches to another thread.
         guard.do_unlocked(|| unsafe { bindings::schedule() });
 
-        // SAFETY: Both `wait` and `wait_list` point to valid memory.
-        unsafe { bindings::finish_wait(self.wait_list.get(), wait.get()) };
+        // SAFETY: Both `wait` and `wait_queue_head` point to valid memory.
+        unsafe { bindings::finish_wait(self.wait_queue_head.get(), wait.get()) };
     }
 
     /// Releases the lock and waits for a notification in interruptible mode.
@@ -144,10 +148,10 @@ pub fn wait_uninterruptible<T: ?Sized, B: Backend>(&self, guard: &mut Guard<'_,
 
     /// Calls the kernel function to notify the appropriate number of threads with the given flags.
     fn notify(&self, count: i32, flags: u32) {
-        // SAFETY: `wait_list` points to valid memory.
+        // SAFETY: `wait_queue_head` points to valid memory.
         unsafe {
             bindings::__wake_up(
-                self.wait_list.get(),
+                self.wait_queue_head.get(),
                 bindings::TASK_NORMAL,
                 count,
                 flags as _,
-- 
2.39.2

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:29 AM Charalampos Mitrodimas
<charmitro@posteo.net> wrote:
>
> Fields named "wait_list" usually are of type "struct list_head". To
> avoid confusion and because it is of type
> "Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>" we are renaming "wait_list" to
> "wait_queue_head".

Applied to `rust-next` -- thanks everyone!

Cheers,
Miguel

On 05.01.24 02:29, Charalampos Mitrodimas wrote:
> Fields named "wait_list" usually are of type "struct list_head". To
> avoid confusion and because it is of type
> "Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>" we are renaming "wait_list" to
> "wait_queue_head".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
> ---
>   rust/kernel/sync/condvar.rs | 20 ++++++++++++--------
>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>

Thanks for the patch!

-- 
Cheers,
Benno

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 2:29 AM Charalampos Mitrodimas
<charmitro@posteo.net> wrote:
>
> Fields named "wait_list" usually are of type "struct list_head". To
> avoid confusion and because it is of type
> "Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>" we are renaming "wait_list" to
> "wait_queue_head".
>
> Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>

This has merge conflicts with a bunch of other patchsets, but the
change itself looks good.

Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>

On 1/4/24 22:29, Charalampos Mitrodimas wrote:
> Fields named "wait_list" usually are of type "struct list_head". To
> avoid confusion and because it is of type
> "Opaque<bindings::wait_queue_head>" we are renaming "wait_list" to
> "wait_queue_head".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charalampos Mitrodimas <charmitro@posteo.net>
> ---
> [...]

Reviewed-by: Martin Rodriguez Reboredo <yakoyoku@gmail.com>