Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.

Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
---
Luca Weiss (2):
      dt-bindings: qcom-qce: Add compatible for SM6350
      arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: Add Crypto Engine

 .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom-qce.yaml       |  1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6350.dtsi               | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: 610a9b8f49fbcf1100716370d3b5f6f884a2835a
change-id: 20240105-sm6350-qce-c6233abbf54f

Best regards,
-- 
Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>

On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.
> 
> Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
> no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.

I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled
a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug
power while at it.

Konrad

On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 1:40 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
> > Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.
> > 
> > Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
> > no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.
>
> I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled
> a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug
> power while at it.

Are you sure you mean QCE here (which this patch is about) and not ICE?

I'm not aware of them working together somehow but I wouldn't be
surprised if there's something since I don't know much of this area at
all.

Regards
Luca

>
> Konrad

On 1/9/24 12:27, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Mon Jan 8, 2024 at 1:40 PM CET, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 5.01.2024 17:15, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>> Add the compatible and nodes for the QCE found on SM6350 SoC.
>>>
>>> Not completely sure how to fully test it but "kcapi-speed --all" shows
>>> no issues. Let me know if I can/should test this more.
>>
>> I think I used `cryptsetup benchmark` with and without the ICE enabled
>> a couple years back. IIRC the CPU should be faaar faster but also chug
>> power while at it.
> 
> Are you sure you mean QCE here (which this patch is about) and not ICE?

I.. think I do. It's been a while.

> 
> I'm not aware of them working together somehow but I wouldn't be
> surprised if there's something since I don't know much of this area at
> all.

No idea

Konrad