[PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add power domain to UFS phy interface

David Heidelberg posted 1 patch 1 year, 12 months ago
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
[PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add power domain to UFS phy interface
Posted by David Heidelberg 1 year, 12 months ago
Reported by: `make CHECK_DTBS=1 qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb`

Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
index c2244824355a..ad8677b62bfb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
@@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
 			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
 				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
 
+			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
+
 			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
 			reset-names = "ufsphy";
 
-- 
2.43.0
Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add power domain to UFS phy interface
Posted by Luca Weiss 1 year, 12 months ago
On Freitag, 29. Dezember 2023 21:29:54 CET David Heidelberg wrote:
> Reported by: `make CHECK_DTBS=1 qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb`
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi index c2244824355a..ad8677b62bfb
> 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> @@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
>  				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> 
> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> +
>  			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>  			reset-names = "ufsphy";

This is potentially the wrong power domain, see the conversation here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231204172829.GA69580@thinkpad/

Hopefully Mani can give some input here :)

Regards
Luca
Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add power domain to UFS phy interface
Posted by Manivannan Sadhasivam 1 year, 12 months ago
On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 10:37:56PM +0100, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On Freitag, 29. Dezember 2023 21:29:54 CET David Heidelberg wrote:
> > Reported by: `make CHECK_DTBS=1 qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb`
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi index c2244824355a..ad8677b62bfb
> > 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
> > @@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
> >  			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
> >  				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
> > 
> > +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
> > +
> >  			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
> >  			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> 
> This is potentially the wrong power domain, see the conversation here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231204172829.GA69580@thinkpad/
> 

Yes, GDSCs are the power domain of the controllers, not PHYs. This applies to
other peripherals such as USB, PCIe etc...

- Mani

> Hopefully Mani can give some input here :)
> 
> Regards
> Luca
> 
> 

-- 
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add power domain to UFS phy interface
Posted by David Heidelberg 1 year, 12 months ago
On 29/12/2023 22:37, Luca Weiss wrote:

> On Freitag, 29. Dezember 2023 21:29:54 CET David Heidelberg wrote:
>> Reported by: `make CHECK_DTBS=1 qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb`
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi index c2244824355a..ad8677b62bfb
>> 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>> @@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>>   			clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
>>   				 <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
>>
>> +			power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>> +
>>   			resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>>   			reset-names = "ufsphy";
> This is potentially the wrong power domain, see the conversation here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231204172829.GA69580@thinkpad/
Thanks, I was thinking about  SDM845_MX, but then looked at rest more 
closer qcom archs and thought it'll be likely GDSC (also by looking at 
ufs_mem_hc reset vectors).
>
> Hopefully Mani can give some input here :)
>
> Regards
> Luca
>
>
-- 
David Heidelberg

Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: add power domain to UFS phy interface
Posted by Caleb Connolly 1 year, 12 months ago
Hi David,

Did you boot-test this?

On 30/12/2023 00:18, David Heidelberg wrote:
> On 29/12/2023 22:37, Luca Weiss wrote:
> 
>> On Freitag, 29. Dezember 2023 21:29:54 CET David Heidelberg wrote:
>>> Reported by: `make CHECK_DTBS=1 qcom/sdm845-oneplus-enchilada.dtb`
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@ixit.cz>
>>> ---
>>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 2 ++
>>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi index c2244824355a..ad8677b62bfb
>>> 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi
>>> @@ -2644,6 +2644,8 @@ ufs_mem_phy: phy@1d87000 {
>>>               clocks = <&gcc GCC_UFS_MEM_CLKREF_CLK>,
>>>                    <&gcc GCC_UFS_PHY_PHY_AUX_CLK>;
>>>
>>> +            power-domains = <&gcc UFS_PHY_GDSC>;
>>> +
>>>               resets = <&ufs_mem_hc 0>;
>>>               reset-names = "ufsphy";
>> This is potentially the wrong power domain, see the conversation here:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20231204172829.GA69580@thinkpad/
> Thanks, I was thinking about  SDM845_MX, but then looked at rest more 
> closer qcom archs and thought it'll be likely GDSC (also by looking at 
> ufs_mem_hc reset vectors).
>>
>> Hopefully Mani can give some input here :)
>>
>> Regards
>> Luca
>>
>>

-- 
// Caleb (they/them)