include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 +- net/sysctl_net.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
The set_ownership callback is not supposed to modify the ctl_table.
Enforce this expectation via the typesystem.
The patch was created with the following coccinelle script:
virtual patch
virtual context
virtual report
@@
identifier func, head, table, uid, gid;
@@
void func(
struct ctl_table_header *head,
- struct ctl_table *table,
+ const struct ctl_table *table,
kuid_t *uid, kgid_t *gid)
{ ... }
This change also is a step to put "struct ctl_table" into .rodata
throughout the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
---
The patch is meant to be merged via the sysctl tree.
This change was originally part of the sysctl-const series [0].
To slim down that series and reduce the message load on other
maintainers to a minimumble, submit this patch on its own.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231204-const-sysctl-v2-2-7a5060b11447@weissschuh.net/
---
include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 +-
net/sysctl_net.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h
index 26a38161c28f..800154e1ff88 100644
--- a/include/linux/sysctl.h
+++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ struct ctl_table_root {
struct ctl_table_set default_set;
struct ctl_table_set *(*lookup)(struct ctl_table_root *root);
void (*set_ownership)(struct ctl_table_header *head,
- struct ctl_table *table,
+ const struct ctl_table *table,
kuid_t *uid, kgid_t *gid);
int (*permissions)(struct ctl_table_header *head, struct ctl_table *table);
};
diff --git a/net/sysctl_net.c b/net/sysctl_net.c
index 051ed5f6fc93..1310ef8f0958 100644
--- a/net/sysctl_net.c
+++ b/net/sysctl_net.c
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static int net_ctl_permissions(struct ctl_table_header *head,
}
static void net_ctl_set_ownership(struct ctl_table_header *head,
- struct ctl_table *table,
+ const struct ctl_table *table,
kuid_t *uid, kgid_t *gid)
{
struct net *net = container_of(head->set, struct net, sysctls);
---
base-commit: de2ee5e9405e12600c81e39837362800cee433a2
change-id: 20231226-sysctl-const-ownership-ff75e67b4eea
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > The set_ownership callback is not supposed to modify the ctl_table. > Enforce this expectation via the typesystem. > > The patch was created with the following coccinelle script: > > virtual patch > virtual context > virtual report If you remove this virtual stuff and mention how we verify manually through the build how users do not exits which rely on modifying the the table I thinkt these two patches are ready, thanks for doing this in Coccinelle it helps me review this faster! Luis
On 2023-12-28 05:22:56-0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > The set_ownership callback is not supposed to modify the ctl_table. > > Enforce this expectation via the typesystem. > > > > The patch was created with the following coccinelle script: > > > > virtual patch > > virtual context > > virtual report > > If you remove this virtual stuff and mention how we verify manually > through the build how users do not exits which rely on modifying the the > table I thinkt these two patches are ready, thanks for doing this in > Coccinelle it helps me review this faster! Actually the 'table' parameter is never even used. Do you prefer to drop it completely? Thomas
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 02:16:15PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > On 2023-12-28 05:22:56-0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 01:32:42PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote: > > > The set_ownership callback is not supposed to modify the ctl_table. > > > Enforce this expectation via the typesystem. > > > > > > The patch was created with the following coccinelle script: > > > > > > virtual patch > > > virtual context > > > virtual report > > > > If you remove this virtual stuff and mention how we verify manually > > through the build how users do not exits which rely on modifying the the > > table I thinkt these two patches are ready, thanks for doing this in > > Coccinelle it helps me review this faster! > > Actually the 'table' parameter is never even used. Oh wow. > Do you prefer to drop it completely? Absolutely. Luis
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.