Correct to \ufffd\ufffd\ufffdboundaries\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd from \ufffd\ufffd\ufffdbounaries\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd in \ufffd\ufffd\ufffdCPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd

Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>
---
 Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst b/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
index 0046af06531a..33c4539155d9 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ Workqueue currently supports the following affinity scopes.
   cases. This is the default affinity scope.
 
 ``numa``
-  CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.
+  CPUs are grouped according to NUMA boundaries.
 
 ``system``
   All CPUs are put in the same group. Workqueue makes no effort to process a
-- 
2.34.1

Hello,

On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:23:17PM +0530, attreyee-muk wrote:
> Correct to “boundaries” from “bounaries” in “CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.”
> 
> Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Jonathan, would you mind taking this patch through doc tree? I don't have
any other wq patches queued for 6.8 and it's a bit awkward to just apply
this one.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2023 at 11:23:17PM +0530, attreyee-muk wrote:
>> Correct to “boundaries” from “bounaries” in “CPUs are grouped according to NUMA bounaries.”
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Attreyee Mukherjee <tintinm2017@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> Jonathan, would you mind taking this patch through doc tree? I don't have
> any other wq patches queued for 6.8 and it's a bit awkward to just apply
> this one.

Sure, will do.

jon