include/linux/wmi.h | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Remove the "private:" comment to prevent the kernel-doc warning:
include/linux/wmi.h:27: warning: Excess struct member 'setable' description in 'wmi_device'
Either a struct member is documented (via kernel-doc) or it's private,
but not both.
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
---
include/linux/wmi.h | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff -- a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h
--- a/include/linux/wmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/wmi.h
@@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
*/
struct wmi_device {
struct device dev;
-
- /* private: used by the WMI driver core */
bool setable;
};
Am 23.12.23 um 06:06 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> Remove the "private:" comment to prevent the kernel-doc warning:
>
> include/linux/wmi.h:27: warning: Excess struct member 'setable' description in 'wmi_device'
>
> Either a struct member is documented (via kernel-doc) or it's private,
> but not both.
Hi,
i am not encountering this kernel doc warning, but your argument is still valid. I also seem to
have missed the fact that WMI drivers may want to know whether their WMI data block is setable
during runtime when i added those kernel-doc comments.
Please add a Fixes: b4cc979588ee ("platform/x86: wmi: Add kernel doc comments") tag so that
this patch can reach the stable kernels. With that addressed, you may also add:
Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thanks,
Armin Wolf
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/wmi.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff -- a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h
> --- a/include/linux/wmi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/wmi.h
> @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
> */
> struct wmi_device {
> struct device dev;
> -
> - /* private: used by the WMI driver core */
> bool setable;
> };
>
Hi Armin,
On 12/22/23 22:48, Armin Wolf wrote:
> Am 23.12.23 um 06:06 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
>
>> Remove the "private:" comment to prevent the kernel-doc warning:
>>
>> include/linux/wmi.h:27: warning: Excess struct member 'setable' description in 'wmi_device'
>>
>> Either a struct member is documented (via kernel-doc) or it's private,
>> but not both.
>
> Hi,
>
> i am not encountering this kernel doc warning, but your argument is still valid. I also seem to
> have missed the fact that WMI drivers may want to know whether their WMI data block is setable
> during runtime when i added those kernel-doc comments.
The warning comes from 2 new patches in linux-next.
> Please add a Fixes: b4cc979588ee ("platform/x86: wmi: Add kernel doc comments") tag so that
> this patch can reach the stable kernels. With that addressed, you may also add:
>
> Reviewed-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thanks. patch v2 is on the way.
> Thanks,
> Armin Wolf
>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
>> Cc: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
>> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>> include/linux/wmi.h | 2 --
>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff -- a/include/linux/wmi.h b/include/linux/wmi.h
>> --- a/include/linux/wmi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/wmi.h
>> @@ -21,8 +21,6 @@
>> */
>> struct wmi_device {
>> struct device dev;
>> -
>> - /* private: used by the WMI driver core */
>> bool setable;
>> };
>>
--
#Randy
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.