[PATCH v7 21/23] sched: Add find_exec_ctx helper

John Stultz posted 23 patches 1 year, 12 months ago
[PATCH v7 21/23] sched: Add find_exec_ctx helper
Posted by John Stultz 1 year, 12 months ago
From: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>

Add a helper to find the runnable owner down a chain of blocked waiters

This patch was broken out from a larger chain migration
patch originally by Connor O'Brien.

Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team@android.com
Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
[jstultz: split out from larger chain migration patch]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/sched/cpupri.c   | 11 ++++++++---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 kernel/sched/rt.c       |  9 ++++++++-
 kernel/sched/sched.h    | 10 ++++++++++
 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0c212dcd4b7a..77a79d5f829a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3896,6 +3896,48 @@ static void activate_blocked_entities(struct rq *target_rq,
 	}
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
 }
+
+static inline bool task_queued_on_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	if (!task_on_rq_queued(task))
+		return false;
+	smp_rmb();
+	if (task_rq(task) != rq)
+		return false;
+	smp_rmb();
+	if (!task_on_rq_queued(task))
+		return false;
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Returns the unblocked task at the end of the blocked chain starting with p
+ * if that chain is composed entirely of tasks enqueued on rq, or NULL otherwise.
+ */
+struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	struct task_struct *exec_ctx, *owner;
+	struct mutex *mutex;
+
+	if (!sched_proxy_exec())
+		return p;
+
+	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+
+	for (exec_ctx = p; task_is_blocked(exec_ctx) && !task_on_cpu(rq, exec_ctx);
+							exec_ctx = owner) {
+		mutex = exec_ctx->blocked_on;
+		owner = __mutex_owner(mutex);
+		if (owner == exec_ctx)
+			break;
+
+		if (!task_queued_on_rq(rq, owner) || task_current_selected(rq, owner)) {
+			exec_ctx = NULL;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	return exec_ctx;
+}
 #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
 static inline void do_activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
 				    int en_flags)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
index 15e947a3ded7..53be78afdd07 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
@@ -96,12 +96,17 @@ static inline int __cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
 	if (skip)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_mask, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
+	if ((p && cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_mask, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) ||
+	    (!p && cpumask_any(vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (lowest_mask) {
-		cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_mask, vec->mask);
-		cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
+		if (p) {
+			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_mask, vec->mask);
+			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
+		} else {
+			cpumask_copy(lowest_mask, vec->mask);
+		}
 
 		/*
 		 * We have to ensure that we have at least one bit
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 999bd17f11c4..21e56ac58e32 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1866,6 +1866,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu __maybe_unused
 
 static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 {
+	struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
+
 	/*
 	 * Current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule,
 	 * let's hope p can move out.
@@ -1874,12 +1876,16 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	    !cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq_selected(rq), rq->curr, NULL))
 		return;
 
+	exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, p);
+	if (task_current(rq, exec_ctx))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * p is migratable, so let's not schedule it and
 	 * see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
 	 */
 	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1 &&
-	    cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, p, NULL))
+	    cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, exec_ctx, NULL))
 		return;
 
 	resched_curr(rq);
@@ -2169,12 +2175,17 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *sched_ctx, struct task_struct *exec
 /* Locks the rq it finds */
 static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
 {
+	struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
 	struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
 	int tries;
 	int cpu;
 
 	for (tries = 0; tries < DL_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
-		cpu = find_later_rq(task, task);
+		exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, task);
+		if (!exec_ctx)
+			break;
+
+		cpu = find_later_rq(task, exec_ctx);
 
 		if ((cpu == -1) || (cpu == rq->cpu))
 			break;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 6371b0fca4ad..f8134d062fa3 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1640,6 +1640,11 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	    !cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq_selected(rq), rq->curr, NULL))
 		return;
 
+	/* No reason to preempt since rq->curr wouldn't change anyway */
+	exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, p);
+	if (task_current(rq, exec_ctx))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * p is migratable, so let's not schedule it and
 	 * see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
@@ -1933,12 +1938,14 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *sched_ctx, struct task_struct *exe
 /* Will lock the rq it finds */
 static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
 {
+	struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
 	struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
 	int tries;
 	int cpu;
 
 	for (tries = 0; tries < RT_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
-		cpu = find_lowest_rq(task, task);
+		exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, task);
+		cpu = find_lowest_rq(task, exec_ctx);
 
 		if ((cpu == -1) || (cpu == rq->cpu))
 			break;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index ef3d327e267c..6cd473224cfe 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -3564,6 +3564,16 @@ int task_is_pushable(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
+struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
+#else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
+static inline
+struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return p;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
-- 
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
Re: [PATCH v7 21/23] sched: Add find_exec_ctx helper
Posted by Metin Kaya 1 year, 12 months ago
On 20/12/2023 12:18 am, John Stultz wrote:
> From: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
> 
> Add a helper to find the runnable owner down a chain of blocked waiters
> 
> This patch was broken out from a larger chain migration
> patch originally by Connor O'Brien.
> 
> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
> Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@google.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
> Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@google.com>
> Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@google.com>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@arm.com>
> Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@gmail.com>
> Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: kernel-team@android.com
> Signed-off-by: Connor O'Brien <connoro@google.com>
> [jstultz: split out from larger chain migration patch]
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> ---
>   kernel/sched/core.c     | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/sched/cpupri.c   | 11 ++++++++---
>   kernel/sched/deadline.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>   kernel/sched/rt.c       |  9 ++++++++-
>   kernel/sched/sched.h    | 10 ++++++++++
>   5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 0c212dcd4b7a..77a79d5f829a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3896,6 +3896,48 @@ static void activate_blocked_entities(struct rq *target_rq,
>   	}
>   	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
>   }
> +
> +static inline bool task_queued_on_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +	if (!task_on_rq_queued(task))
> +		return false;
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	if (task_rq(task) != rq)
> +		return false;
> +	smp_rmb();
> +	if (!task_on_rq_queued(task))
> +		return false;

* Super-nit: we may want to have empty lines between `if` blocks and 
before/after `smp_rmb()` calls.

* I did not understand why we call `task_on_rq_queued(task)` twice. 
Should we have an explanatory comment before the function definition?

> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Returns the unblocked task at the end of the blocked chain starting with p
> + * if that chain is composed entirely of tasks enqueued on rq, or NULL otherwise.
> + */
> +struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *exec_ctx, *owner;
> +	struct mutex *mutex;
> +
> +	if (!sched_proxy_exec())
> +		return p;
> +
> +	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
> +
> +	for (exec_ctx = p; task_is_blocked(exec_ctx) && !task_on_cpu(rq, exec_ctx);
> +							exec_ctx = owner) {
> +		mutex = exec_ctx->blocked_on;
> +		owner = __mutex_owner(mutex);
> +		if (owner == exec_ctx)
> +			break;
> +
> +		if (!task_queued_on_rq(rq, owner) || task_current_selected(rq, owner)) {
> +			exec_ctx = NULL;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return exec_ctx;
> +}
>   #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
>   static inline void do_activate_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
>   				    int en_flags)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
> index 15e947a3ded7..53be78afdd07 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
> @@ -96,12 +96,17 @@ static inline int __cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
>   	if (skip)
>   		return 0;
>   
> -	if (cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_mask, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
> +	if ((p && cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_mask, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) ||
> +	    (!p && cpumask_any(vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids))
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	if (lowest_mask) {
> -		cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_mask, vec->mask);
> -		cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> +		if (p) {
> +			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_mask, vec->mask);
> +			cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> +		} else {
> +			cpumask_copy(lowest_mask, vec->mask);
> +		}

I think changes in `cpupri.c` should be part of previous (`sched: Push 
execution and scheduler context split into deadline and rt paths`) 
patch. Because they don't seem to be related with find_exec_ctx()?

>   
>   		/*
>   		 * We have to ensure that we have at least one bit
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 999bd17f11c4..21e56ac58e32 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1866,6 +1866,8 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu __maybe_unused
>   
>   static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>   {
> +	struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Current can't be migrated, useless to reschedule,
>   	 * let's hope p can move out.
> @@ -1874,12 +1876,16 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>   	    !cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, rq_selected(rq), rq->curr, NULL))
>   		return;
>   
> +	exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, p);
> +	if (task_current(rq, exec_ctx))
> +		return;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * p is migratable, so let's not schedule it and
>   	 * see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
>   	 */
>   	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed != 1 &&
> -	    cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, p, NULL))
> +	    cpudl_find(&rq->rd->cpudl, p, exec_ctx, NULL))
>   		return;
>   
>   	resched_curr(rq);
> @@ -2169,12 +2175,17 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *sched_ctx, struct task_struct *exec
>   /* Locks the rq it finds */
>   static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
>   {
> +	struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
>   	struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
>   	int tries;
>   	int cpu;
>   
>   	for (tries = 0; tries < DL_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
> -		cpu = find_later_rq(task, task);
> +		exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, task);
> +		if (!exec_ctx)
> +			break;
> +
> +		cpu = find_later_rq(task, exec_ctx);
>   

Super-nit: this empty line should be removed to keep logically connected 
lines closer.
The same for find_lock_lowest_rq().

>   		if ((cpu == -1) || (cpu == rq->cpu))
>   			break;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 6371b0fca4ad..f8134d062fa3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1640,6 +1640,11 @@ static void check_preempt_equal_prio(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>   	    !cpupri_find(&rq->rd->cpupri, rq_selected(rq), rq->curr, NULL))
>   		return;
>   
> +	/* No reason to preempt since rq->curr wouldn't change anyway */
> +	exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, p);
> +	if (task_current(rq, exec_ctx))
> +		return;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * p is migratable, so let's not schedule it and
>   	 * see if it is pushed or pulled somewhere else.
> @@ -1933,12 +1938,14 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *sched_ctx, struct task_struct *exe
>   /* Will lock the rq it finds */
>   static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
>   {
> +	struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
>   	struct rq *lowest_rq = NULL;
>   	int tries;
>   	int cpu;
>   
>   	for (tries = 0; tries < RT_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
> -		cpu = find_lowest_rq(task, task);
> +		exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, task);
> +		cpu = find_lowest_rq(task, exec_ctx);
>   
>   		if ((cpu == -1) || (cpu == rq->cpu))
>   			break;
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index ef3d327e267c..6cd473224cfe 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -3564,6 +3564,16 @@ int task_is_pushable(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
>   
>   	return 0;
>   }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> +struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
> +#else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
> +static inline
> +struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	return p;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
>   #endif

Nit: `#ifdef CONFIG_SMP` block becomes bigger after this hunk. We should 
append `/* CONFIG_SMP */` to this line, IMHO.

>   
>   #endif /* _KERNEL_SCHED_SCHED_H */
Re: [PATCH v7 21/23] sched: Add find_exec_ctx helper
Posted by John Stultz 1 year, 11 months ago
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 3:57 AM Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com> wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 12:18 am, John Stultz wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 0c212dcd4b7a..77a79d5f829a 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -3896,6 +3896,48 @@ static void activate_blocked_entities(struct rq *target_rq,
> >       }
> >       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->blocked_lock, flags);
> >   }
> > +
> > +static inline bool task_queued_on_rq(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
> > +{
> > +     if (!task_on_rq_queued(task))
> > +             return false;
> > +     smp_rmb();
> > +     if (task_rq(task) != rq)
> > +             return false;
> > +     smp_rmb();
> > +     if (!task_on_rq_queued(task))
> > +             return false;
>
> * Super-nit: we may want to have empty lines between `if` blocks and
> before/after `smp_rmb()` calls.

Done.

> * I did not understand why we call `task_on_rq_queued(task)` twice.
> Should we have an explanatory comment before the function definition?

Yeah. I'll put a better comment on my todo there.

> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
> > index 15e947a3ded7..53be78afdd07 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpupri.c
> > @@ -96,12 +96,17 @@ static inline int __cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
> >       if (skip)
> >               return 0;
> >
> > -     if (cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_mask, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > +     if ((p && cpumask_any_and(&p->cpus_mask, vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) ||
> > +         (!p && cpumask_any(vec->mask) >= nr_cpu_ids))
> >               return 0;
> >
> >       if (lowest_mask) {
> > -             cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_mask, vec->mask);
> > -             cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> > +             if (p) {
> > +                     cpumask_and(lowest_mask, &p->cpus_mask, vec->mask);
> > +                     cpumask_and(lowest_mask, lowest_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     cpumask_copy(lowest_mask, vec->mask);
> > +             }
>
> I think changes in `cpupri.c` should be part of previous (`sched: Push
> execution and scheduler context split into deadline and rt paths`)
> patch. Because they don't seem to be related with find_exec_ctx()?

So, it's here only because find_exec_ctx() can return null, so we have
to have the null p checks.

I'll think a bit if we can avoid it here.

> > @@ -2169,12 +2175,17 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *sched_ctx, struct task_struct *exec
> >   /* Locks the rq it finds */
> >   static struct rq *find_lock_later_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
> >   {
> > +     struct task_struct *exec_ctx;
> >       struct rq *later_rq = NULL;
> >       int tries;
> >       int cpu;
> >
> >       for (tries = 0; tries < DL_MAX_TRIES; tries++) {
> > -             cpu = find_later_rq(task, task);
> > +             exec_ctx = find_exec_ctx(rq, task);
> > +             if (!exec_ctx)
> > +                     break;
> > +
> > +             cpu = find_later_rq(task, exec_ctx);
> >
>
> Super-nit: this empty line should be removed to keep logically connected
> lines closer.

Done.


> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC
> > +struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
> > +#else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
> > +static inline
> > +struct task_struct *find_exec_ctx(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +     return p;
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_PROXY_EXEC */
> >   #endif
>
> Nit: `#ifdef CONFIG_SMP` block becomes bigger after this hunk. We should
> append `/* CONFIG_SMP */` to this line, IMHO.
>

Done.

Thanks for the feedback!
-john