Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c
index 794e70151203..a06b876bbf2d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /*
  * x86 FPU bug checks:
  */
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
 #include <asm/fpu/api.h>
 
 /*
-- 
2.43.0

For the x86 patches [2-5/50], should the patch subject be a bit more
generic rather than having the full file name listed.

For example, this patch could be "x86/fpu: Fix missing include".

On 12/16/2023 8:17 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:38:33PM +0530, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> For the x86 patches [2-5/50], should the patch subject be a bit more
> generic rather than having the full file name listed.
> 
> For example, this patch could be "x86/fpu: Fix missing include".

In the latest version of the patchset I've just rolled all of the
arch/x86 missing includes into one patch.