remove the second including of linux/posix_acl.h

Signed-off-by: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>
---
 fs/overlayfs/inode.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
index c63b31a460be..2003425875d9 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <linux/fileattr.h>
 #include <linux/security.h>
 #include <linux/namei.h>
-#include <linux/posix_acl.h>
 #include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
 #include "overlayfs.h"
 
-- 
2.40.0

On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 12:17 PM Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com> wrote:
>
> remove the second including of linux/posix_acl.h
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>
> ---
>  fs/overlayfs/inode.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
> index c63b31a460be..2003425875d9 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/inode.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
>  #include <linux/fileattr.h>
>  #include <linux/security.h>
>  #include <linux/namei.h>
> -#include <linux/posix_acl.h>
>  #include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
>  #include "overlayfs.h"
>

Since both posix_acl.h and posix_acl_xattr.h are included by overlayfs.h
I would rather remove them both including the first posix_acl.h include.

It is far from being the only duplicate include in "overlayfs.h" and it is not
important enough IMO to start a cleanup project, but if you are going to
tidy up includes for a particular file, I'd rather use the opportunity to
cleanup that duplicity as well.

Thanks,
Amir.