When the thermal instance's weight is updated from the sysfs the governor
update_tz() callback is triggered. Implement proper reaction to this
event in the IPA, which would save CPU cycles spent in throttle().
This will speed-up the main throttle() IPA function and clean it up
a bit.
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
---
drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
index 574aa5822112..a9f1549e6355 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static inline s64 div_frac(s64 x, s64 y)
* @trip_switch_on should be NULL.
* @trip_max: last passive trip point of the thermal zone. The
* temperature we are controlling for.
+ * @total_weight: Sum of all thermal instances weights
* @num_actors: number of cooling devices supporting IPA callbacks
* @buffer_size: IPA internal buffer size
* @req_power: IPA buffer for requested power
@@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct power_allocator_params {
u32 sustainable_power;
const struct thermal_trip *trip_switch_on;
const struct thermal_trip *trip_max;
+ int total_weight;
int num_actors;
int buffer_size;
u32 *req_power;
@@ -403,16 +405,11 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
u32 total_req_power = 0;
u32 *weighted_req_power;
u32 power_range, weight;
- int total_weight = 0;
int i = 0;
if (!params->num_actors)
return -ENODEV;
- list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
- if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
- total_weight += instance->weight;
-
/* Clean all buffers for new power estimations */
memset(params->req_power, 0, params->buffer_size);
@@ -430,7 +427,7 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
if (cdev->ops->get_requested_power(cdev, &req_power[i]))
continue;
- if (!total_weight)
+ if (!params->total_weight)
weight = 1 << FRAC_BITS;
else
weight = instance->weight;
@@ -666,6 +663,12 @@ static void power_allocator_update_tz(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
allocate_actors_buffer(params, num_actors);
break;
+ case THERMAL_INSTANCE_WEIGHT_UPDATE:
+ params->total_weight = 0;
+ list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
+ if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
+ params->total_weight += instance->weight;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
--
2.25.1
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 2:48 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote:
>
> When the thermal instance's weight is updated from the sysfs the governor
> update_tz() callback is triggered. Implement proper reaction to this
> event in the IPA, which would save CPU cycles spent in throttle().
> This will speed-up the main throttle() IPA function and clean it up
> a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
> index 574aa5822112..a9f1549e6355 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static inline s64 div_frac(s64 x, s64 y)
> * @trip_switch_on should be NULL.
> * @trip_max: last passive trip point of the thermal zone. The
> * temperature we are controlling for.
> + * @total_weight: Sum of all thermal instances weights
> * @num_actors: number of cooling devices supporting IPA callbacks
> * @buffer_size: IPA internal buffer size
> * @req_power: IPA buffer for requested power
> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct power_allocator_params {
> u32 sustainable_power;
> const struct thermal_trip *trip_switch_on;
> const struct thermal_trip *trip_max;
> + int total_weight;
> int num_actors;
> int buffer_size;
> u32 *req_power;
> @@ -403,16 +405,11 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
> u32 total_req_power = 0;
> u32 *weighted_req_power;
> u32 power_range, weight;
> - int total_weight = 0;
> int i = 0;
>
> if (!params->num_actors)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
> - if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
> - total_weight += instance->weight;
> -
> /* Clean all buffers for new power estimations */
> memset(params->req_power, 0, params->buffer_size);
>
> @@ -430,7 +427,7 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
> if (cdev->ops->get_requested_power(cdev, &req_power[i]))
> continue;
>
> - if (!total_weight)
> + if (!params->total_weight)
> weight = 1 << FRAC_BITS;
> else
> weight = instance->weight;
> @@ -666,6 +663,12 @@ static void power_allocator_update_tz(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>
> allocate_actors_buffer(params, num_actors);
> break;
> + case THERMAL_INSTANCE_WEIGHT_UPDATE:
> + params->total_weight = 0;
> + list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
> + if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
> + params->total_weight += instance->weight;
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> --
This one looks good to me, but if you decide to follow my advice from
the previous comments, it will need to be adjusted.
Hi Rafael,
On 12/20/23 14:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 2:48 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> When the thermal instance's weight is updated from the sysfs the governor
>> update_tz() callback is triggered. Implement proper reaction to this
>> event in the IPA, which would save CPU cycles spent in throttle().
>> This will speed-up the main throttle() IPA function and clean it up
>> a bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 15 +++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> index 574aa5822112..a9f1549e6355 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static inline s64 div_frac(s64 x, s64 y)
>> * @trip_switch_on should be NULL.
>> * @trip_max: last passive trip point of the thermal zone. The
>> * temperature we are controlling for.
>> + * @total_weight: Sum of all thermal instances weights
>> * @num_actors: number of cooling devices supporting IPA callbacks
>> * @buffer_size: IPA internal buffer size
>> * @req_power: IPA buffer for requested power
>> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct power_allocator_params {
>> u32 sustainable_power;
>> const struct thermal_trip *trip_switch_on;
>> const struct thermal_trip *trip_max;
>> + int total_weight;
>> int num_actors;
>> int buffer_size;
>> u32 *req_power;
>> @@ -403,16 +405,11 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
>> u32 total_req_power = 0;
>> u32 *weighted_req_power;
>> u32 power_range, weight;
>> - int total_weight = 0;
>> int i = 0;
>>
>> if (!params->num_actors)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
>> - if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
>> - total_weight += instance->weight;
>> -
>> /* Clean all buffers for new power estimations */
>> memset(params->req_power, 0, params->buffer_size);
>>
>> @@ -430,7 +427,7 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
>> if (cdev->ops->get_requested_power(cdev, &req_power[i]))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (!total_weight)
>> + if (!params->total_weight)
>> weight = 1 << FRAC_BITS;
>> else
>> weight = instance->weight;
>> @@ -666,6 +663,12 @@ static void power_allocator_update_tz(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>>
>> allocate_actors_buffer(params, num_actors);
>> break;
>> + case THERMAL_INSTANCE_WEIGHT_UPDATE:
>> + params->total_weight = 0;
>> + list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
>> + if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
>> + params->total_weight += instance->weight;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> }
>> --
>
> This one looks good to me, but if you decide to follow my advice from
> the previous comments, it will need to be adjusted.
Yes, I will follow your recommendations, so this will be adjusted.
Thank you for the review. I will respond to your other comments in
patches as well.
Regards,
Lukasz
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.