Add support to listen HW safety IRQ like ECC(error
correction code), DPP(data path parity), FSM(finite state
machine) fault in common IRQ line.
Signed-off-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 1 +
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 3 +++
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
.../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 9 ++++++++
4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
index 721c1f8e892f..b9233b09b80f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum request_irq_err {
REQ_IRQ_ERR_ALL,
REQ_IRQ_ERR_TX,
REQ_IRQ_ERR_RX,
+ REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY,
REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_UE,
REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_CE,
REQ_IRQ_ERR_LPI,
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
index 9f89acf31050..ca3d93851bed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct stmmac_resources {
int wol_irq;
int lpi_irq;
int irq;
+ int sfty_irq;
int sfty_ce_irq;
int sfty_ue_irq;
int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
@@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
void __iomem *ptpaddr;
void __iomem *estaddr;
unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
+ int sfty_irq;
int sfty_ce_irq;
int sfty_ue_irq;
int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
@@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
char int_name_mac[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
char int_name_wol[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
char int_name_lpi[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
+ char int_name_sfty[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
char int_name_sfty_ce[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
char int_name_sfty_ue[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
char int_name_rx_irq[MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES][IFNAMSIZ + 14];
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
index 47de466e432c..6cf289f192a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
@@ -3592,6 +3592,10 @@ static void stmmac_free_irq(struct net_device *dev,
if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq)
free_irq(priv->wol_irq, dev);
fallthrough;
+ case REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY:
+ if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq)
+ free_irq(priv->sfty_irq, dev);
+ fallthrough;
case REQ_IRQ_ERR_WOL:
free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
fallthrough;
@@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
enum request_irq_err irq_err;
int ret;
+ char *int_name;
ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
@@ -3798,6 +3803,20 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
}
}
+ if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
+ int_name = priv->int_name_sfty;
+ sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "safety");
+ ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
+ 0, int_name, dev);
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ netdev_err(priv->dev,
+ "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
+ __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
+ irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
+ goto irq_error;
+ }
+ }
+
return 0;
irq_error:
@@ -7462,8 +7481,10 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
priv->dev->irq = res->irq;
priv->wol_irq = res->wol_irq;
priv->lpi_irq = res->lpi_irq;
+ priv->sfty_irq = res->sfty_irq;
priv->sfty_ce_irq = res->sfty_ce_irq;
priv->sfty_ue_irq = res->sfty_ue_irq;
+
for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++)
priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];
for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
index 1ffde555da47..3808a3225a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
@@ -726,6 +726,15 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
}
+ stmmac_res->sfty_irq =
+ platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "sfty");
+
+ if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq < 0) {
+ if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ safety IRQ not found\n");
+ }
+
stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
--
2.25.1
Hi Suraj
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
> Add support to listen HW safety IRQ like ECC(error
> correction code), DPP(data path parity), FSM(finite state
> machine) fault in common IRQ line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 3 +++
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 9 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> index 721c1f8e892f..b9233b09b80f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum request_irq_err {
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_ALL,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_TX,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_RX,
> + REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_UE,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_CE,
> REQ_IRQ_ERR_LPI,
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> index 9f89acf31050..ca3d93851bed 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct stmmac_resources {
> int wol_irq;
> int lpi_irq;
> int irq;
> + int sfty_irq;
> int sfty_ce_irq;
> int sfty_ue_irq;
> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
> @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> void __iomem *ptpaddr;
> void __iomem *estaddr;
> unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
> + int sfty_irq;
> int sfty_ce_irq;
> int sfty_ue_irq;
> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
> @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> char int_name_mac[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> char int_name_wol[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> char int_name_lpi[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> + char int_name_sfty[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> char int_name_sfty_ce[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> char int_name_sfty_ue[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> char int_name_rx_irq[MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES][IFNAMSIZ + 14];
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index 47de466e432c..6cf289f192a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -3592,6 +3592,10 @@ static void stmmac_free_irq(struct net_device *dev,
> if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq)
> free_irq(priv->wol_irq, dev);
> fallthrough;
> + case REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY:
> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq)
> + free_irq(priv->sfty_irq, dev);
> + fallthrough;
> case REQ_IRQ_ERR_WOL:
> free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
> fallthrough;
> @@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> enum request_irq_err irq_err;
> int ret;
> + char *int_name;
See my comment below.
>
> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
> @@ -3798,6 +3803,20 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
> }
> }
>
> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
> + int_name = priv->int_name_sfty;
> + sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "safety");
> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
> + 0, int_name, dev);
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
> + goto irq_error;
> + }
> + }
> +
Omg, I thought this change belonged to stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
My bad, sorry. Please move the code above to
stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and get back the part in
stmmac_request_irq_single() as it was in v5, but instead of specifying
"safety" IRQ name use "dev->name" as the rest of similar code snippets
in here have:
+ if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
+ ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
+ 0, dev->name, dev);
+ if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
+ netdev_err(priv->dev,
+ "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
+ __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
+ irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
+ goto irq_error;
+ }
+ }
I guess at some point afterwards we'll need to refactor the IRQs
request part of this driver: replace stmmac_request_irq_single() body
with the upper part of the stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() method and
then just make the former method being called from the later one...
> return 0;
>
> irq_error:
> @@ -7462,8 +7481,10 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
> priv->dev->irq = res->irq;
> priv->wol_irq = res->wol_irq;
> priv->lpi_irq = res->lpi_irq;
> + priv->sfty_irq = res->sfty_irq;
> priv->sfty_ce_irq = res->sfty_ce_irq;
> priv->sfty_ue_irq = res->sfty_ue_irq;
> +
Please drop this change. The code below is attached to the code above
because it basically does the same but in the loop.
> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++)
> priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];
> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index 1ffde555da47..3808a3225a7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -726,6 +726,15 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
> }
>
> + stmmac_res->sfty_irq =
> + platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "sfty");
> +
Please drop this change too. It's normal to have a method call
attached to the error check statement especially seeing the rest of
the similar code snippets are designed that way in this function.
-Serge(y)
> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq < 0) {
> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ safety IRQ not found\n");
> + }
> +
> stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>
> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Hi Serge,
Please find commnet inline & let me know if any further action needed
Thanks
Suraj
On 12/14/2023 8:42 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hi Suraj
>
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
>> Add support to listen HW safety IRQ like ECC(error
>> correction code), DPP(data path parity), FSM(finite state
>> machine) fault in common IRQ line.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 1 +
>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 3 +++
>> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
>> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 9 ++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>> index 721c1f8e892f..b9233b09b80f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum request_irq_err {
>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_ALL,
>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_TX,
>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_RX,
>> + REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY,
>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_UE,
>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_CE,
>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_LPI,
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
>> index 9f89acf31050..ca3d93851bed 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct stmmac_resources {
>> int wol_irq;
>> int lpi_irq;
>> int irq;
>> + int sfty_irq;
>> int sfty_ce_irq;
>> int sfty_ue_irq;
>> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
>> @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
>> void __iomem *ptpaddr;
>> void __iomem *estaddr;
>> unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
>> + int sfty_irq;
>> int sfty_ce_irq;
>> int sfty_ue_irq;
>> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
>> @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
>> char int_name_mac[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>> char int_name_wol[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>> char int_name_lpi[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>> + char int_name_sfty[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
>> char int_name_sfty_ce[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
>> char int_name_sfty_ue[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
>> char int_name_rx_irq[MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES][IFNAMSIZ + 14];
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> index 47de466e432c..6cf289f192a7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>> @@ -3592,6 +3592,10 @@ static void stmmac_free_irq(struct net_device *dev,
>> if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq)
>> free_irq(priv->wol_irq, dev);
>> fallthrough;
>> + case REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY:
>> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq)
>> + free_irq(priv->sfty_irq, dev);
>> + fallthrough;
>> case REQ_IRQ_ERR_WOL:
>> free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
>> fallthrough;
>> @@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
>> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> enum request_irq_err irq_err;
>> int ret;
>
>> + char *int_name;
>
> See my comment below.
>
>>
>> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
>> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
>> @@ -3798,6 +3803,20 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>
>> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
>> + int_name = priv->int_name_sfty;
>> + sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "safety");
>> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
>> + 0, int_name, dev);
>> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
>> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
>> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
>> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
>> + goto irq_error;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>
> Omg, I thought this change belonged to stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
> My bad, sorry. Please move the code above to
> stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and get back the part in
> stmmac_request_irq_single() as it was in v5, but instead of specifying
> "safety" IRQ name use "dev->name" as the rest of similar code snippets
> in here have:
>
> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
> + 0, dev->name, dev);
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
> + goto irq_error;
> + }
> + }
<Suraj> We can not use "dev->name" as this is name already used by "stmmac_interrupt" @ https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1.68/source/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c#L3655.
<
ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
>
if we are using same "dev->name" while requesting safety IRQ as well then "/proc/interrupt" will show same name eth0/eth1 for both "stmmac_interrupt" & "safety interrupt" and by looking at "/proc/interrupt" output we can not say which IRQ is for safety and which is for stmmac_interrupt.
>
> I guess at some point afterwards we'll need to refactor the IRQs
> request part of this driver: replace stmmac_request_irq_single() body
> with the upper part of the stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() method and
> then just make the former method being called from the later one...
>
>> return 0;
>>
>> irq_error:
>> @@ -7462,8 +7481,10 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
>> priv->dev->irq = res->irq;
>> priv->wol_irq = res->wol_irq;
>> priv->lpi_irq = res->lpi_irq;
>> + priv->sfty_irq = res->sfty_irq;
>> priv->sfty_ce_irq = res->sfty_ce_irq;
>> priv->sfty_ue_irq = res->sfty_ue_irq;
>
>> +
>
> Please drop this change. The code below is attached to the code above
> because it basically does the same but in the loop.
<Suraj> below loop code "for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++) priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];" is not for rx_irq array and will not help for safety irq.
Let me know if I got your commnet properly .
>
>> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++)
>> priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];
>> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++)
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> index 1ffde555da47..3808a3225a7d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>> @@ -726,6 +726,15 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
>> }
>>
>> + stmmac_res->sfty_irq =
>> + platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "sfty");
>
>> +
>
> Please drop this change too. It's normal to have a method call
> attached to the error check statement especially seeing the rest of
> the similar code snippets are designed that way in this function.
<Suraj> Do you means to remove all below code where we are printing the dev_info() message ?
We added this code similar to LPM code.
>
> -Serge(y)
>
>> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq < 0) {
>> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ safety IRQ not found\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>>
>> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>>
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 03:27:54PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
>
> Hi Serge,
> Please find commnet inline & let me know if any further action needed
>
> Thanks
> Suraj
>
> On 12/14/2023 8:42 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> > Hi Suraj
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
> >> Add support to listen HW safety IRQ like ECC(error
> >> correction code), DPP(data path parity), FSM(finite state
> >> machine) fault in common IRQ line.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 1 +
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 3 +++
> >> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 9 ++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> >> index 721c1f8e892f..b9233b09b80f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
> >> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum request_irq_err {
> >> REQ_IRQ_ERR_ALL,
> >> REQ_IRQ_ERR_TX,
> >> REQ_IRQ_ERR_RX,
> >> + REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY,
> >> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_UE,
> >> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_CE,
> >> REQ_IRQ_ERR_LPI,
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> >> index 9f89acf31050..ca3d93851bed 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
> >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct stmmac_resources {
> >> int wol_irq;
> >> int lpi_irq;
> >> int irq;
> >> + int sfty_irq;
> >> int sfty_ce_irq;
> >> int sfty_ue_irq;
> >> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
> >> @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> >> void __iomem *ptpaddr;
> >> void __iomem *estaddr;
> >> unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
> >> + int sfty_irq;
> >> int sfty_ce_irq;
> >> int sfty_ue_irq;
> >> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
> >> @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
> >> char int_name_mac[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> >> char int_name_wol[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> >> char int_name_lpi[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
> >> + char int_name_sfty[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> >> char int_name_sfty_ce[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> >> char int_name_sfty_ue[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
> >> char int_name_rx_irq[MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES][IFNAMSIZ + 14];
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> >> index 47de466e432c..6cf289f192a7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> >> @@ -3592,6 +3592,10 @@ static void stmmac_free_irq(struct net_device *dev,
> >> if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq)
> >> free_irq(priv->wol_irq, dev);
> >> fallthrough;
> >> + case REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY:
> >> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq)
> >> + free_irq(priv->sfty_irq, dev);
> >> + fallthrough;
> >> case REQ_IRQ_ERR_WOL:
> >> free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
> >> fallthrough;
> >> @@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
> >> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> >> enum request_irq_err irq_err;
> >> int ret;
> >
> >> + char *int_name;
> >
> > See my comment below.
> >
> >>
> >> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
> >> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
> >> @@ -3798,6 +3803,20 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >
> >> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
> >> + int_name = priv->int_name_sfty;
> >> + sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "safety");
> >> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
> >> + 0, int_name, dev);
> >> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> >> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
> >> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
> >> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
> >> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
> >> + goto irq_error;
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >
> > Omg, I thought this change belonged to stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
> > My bad, sorry. Please move the code above to
> > stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and get back the part in
> > stmmac_request_irq_single() as it was in v5,
Please note my comment regarding the common safety IRQ being supported
in both stmmac_request_irq_single() and stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi()
methods.
> but instead of specifying
> > "safety" IRQ name use "dev->name" as the rest of similar code snippets
> > in here have:
> >
> > + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
> > + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
> > + 0, dev->name, dev);
> > + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
> > + netdev_err(priv->dev,
> > + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
> > + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
> > + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
> > + goto irq_error;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> <Suraj> We can not use "dev->name" as this is name already used by "stmmac_interrupt" @ https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1.68/source/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c#L3655.
It's not that much of the problem. The main idea is to convert your
solution to following the _local_ coding convention. See, the rest of
the IRQs in stmmac_request_irq_single() are requested with "dev->name"
being specified as the IRQ name (irrespective to having such solution
being not that correct). That's what I was talking about. If you want
the safety IRQ to have an unique name, then please submit this patch
as I suggested above and _then_, on top of it, add a new patch which
would convert the entire stmmac_request_irq_single() method to
creating all IRQ names as it's, for instance, done in
stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
> <
> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
> >
> if we are using same "dev->name" while requesting safety IRQ as well then "/proc/interrupt" will show same name eth0/eth1 for both "stmmac_interrupt" & "safety interrupt" and by looking at "/proc/interrupt" output we can not say which IRQ is for safety and which is for stmmac_interrupt.
Thanks. I am perfectly aware of that. Please see my comment above.
> >
> > I guess at some point afterwards we'll need to refactor the IRQs
> > request part of this driver: replace stmmac_request_irq_single() body
> > with the upper part of the stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() method and
> > then just make the former method being called from the later one...
> >
> >> return 0;
> >>
> >> irq_error:
> >> @@ -7462,8 +7481,10 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
> >> priv->dev->irq = res->irq;
> >> priv->wol_irq = res->wol_irq;
> >> priv->lpi_irq = res->lpi_irq;
> >> + priv->sfty_irq = res->sfty_irq;
> >> priv->sfty_ce_irq = res->sfty_ce_irq;
> >> priv->sfty_ue_irq = res->sfty_ue_irq;
> >
> >> +
> >
> > Please drop this change. The code below is attached to the code above
> > because it basically does the same but in the loop.
> <Suraj> below loop code "for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++) priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];" is not for rx_irq array and will not help for safety irq.
> Let me know if I got your commnet properly .
Sorry, you didn't. My comment concerned the _empty_ line you placed
between the code above and below. You shouldn't have done that.
> >
> >> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++)
> >> priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];
> >> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++)
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >> index 1ffde555da47..3808a3225a7d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> >> @@ -726,6 +726,15 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
> >> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
> >> }
> >>
> >> + stmmac_res->sfty_irq =
> >> + platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "sfty");
> >
> >> +
> >
> > Please drop this change too. It's normal to have a method call
> > attached to the error check statement especially seeing the rest of
> > the similar code snippets are designed that way in this function.
> <Suraj> Do you means to remove all below code where we are printing the dev_info() message ?
No. I was referring to the _empty_ line between the method above and
the error check code below. It's pointless and at the very least
breaks the local coding convention.
-Serge(y)
> We added this code similar to LPM code.
> >
> > -Serge(y)
> >
> >> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq < 0) {
> >> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> >> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ safety IRQ not found\n");
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> >>
> >> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
Hi Serge,
takan care of all commnets in V7 . Please review
Thanks
Suraj
On 12/18/2023 4:18 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 03:27:54PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
>>
>> Hi Serge,
>> Please find commnet inline & let me know if any further action needed
>>
>> Thanks
>> Suraj
>>
>> On 12/14/2023 8:42 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
>>> Hi Suraj
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 05:28:41PM +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote:
>>>> Add support to listen HW safety IRQ like ECC(error
>>>> correction code), DPP(data path parity), FSM(finite state
>>>> machine) fault in common IRQ line.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suraj Jaiswal <quic_jsuraj@quicinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h | 1 +
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h | 3 +++
>>>> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c | 9 ++++++++
>>>> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>>>> index 721c1f8e892f..b9233b09b80f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/common.h
>>>> @@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ enum request_irq_err {
>>>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_ALL,
>>>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_TX,
>>>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_RX,
>>>> + REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY,
>>>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_UE,
>>>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY_CE,
>>>> REQ_IRQ_ERR_LPI,
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
>>>> index 9f89acf31050..ca3d93851bed 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac.h
>>>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct stmmac_resources {
>>>> int wol_irq;
>>>> int lpi_irq;
>>>> int irq;
>>>> + int sfty_irq;
>>>> int sfty_ce_irq;
>>>> int sfty_ue_irq;
>>>> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
>>>> @@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
>>>> void __iomem *ptpaddr;
>>>> void __iomem *estaddr;
>>>> unsigned long active_vlans[BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID)];
>>>> + int sfty_irq;
>>>> int sfty_ce_irq;
>>>> int sfty_ue_irq;
>>>> int rx_irq[MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES];
>>>> @@ -305,6 +307,7 @@ struct stmmac_priv {
>>>> char int_name_mac[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>>>> char int_name_wol[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>>>> char int_name_lpi[IFNAMSIZ + 9];
>>>> + char int_name_sfty[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
>>>> char int_name_sfty_ce[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
>>>> char int_name_sfty_ue[IFNAMSIZ + 10];
>>>> char int_name_rx_irq[MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES][IFNAMSIZ + 14];
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>>> index 47de466e432c..6cf289f192a7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
>>>> @@ -3592,6 +3592,10 @@ static void stmmac_free_irq(struct net_device *dev,
>>>> if (priv->wol_irq > 0 && priv->wol_irq != dev->irq)
>>>> free_irq(priv->wol_irq, dev);
>>>> fallthrough;
>>>> + case REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY:
>>>> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq)
>>>> + free_irq(priv->sfty_irq, dev);
>>>> + fallthrough;
>>>> case REQ_IRQ_ERR_WOL:
>>>> free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
>>>> fallthrough;
>>>> @@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
>>>> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>>> enum request_irq_err irq_err;
>>>> int ret;
>>>
>>>> + char *int_name;
>>>
>>> See my comment below.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
>>>> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
>>>> @@ -3798,6 +3803,20 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev)
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>>> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
>>>> + int_name = priv->int_name_sfty;
>>>> + sprintf(int_name, "%s:%s", dev->name, "safety");
>>>> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
>>>> + 0, int_name, dev);
>>>> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>>>> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
>>>> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
>>>> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
>>>> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
>>>> + goto irq_error;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>
>>> Omg, I thought this change belonged to stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
>>> My bad, sorry. Please move the code above to
>>> stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and get back the part in
>>> stmmac_request_irq_single() as it was in v5,
>
> Please note my comment regarding the common safety IRQ being supported
> in both stmmac_request_irq_single() and stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi()
> methods.
>
>> but instead of specifying
>>> "safety" IRQ name use "dev->name" as the rest of similar code snippets
>>> in here have:
>>>
>>> + if (priv->sfty_irq > 0 && priv->sfty_irq != dev->irq) {
>>> + ret = request_irq(priv->sfty_irq, stmmac_safety_interrupt,
>>> + 0, dev->name, dev);
>>> + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>>> + netdev_err(priv->dev,
>>> + "%s: alloc safety failed %d (error: %d)\n",
>>> + __func__, priv->sfty_irq, ret);
>>> + irq_err = REQ_IRQ_ERR_SFTY;
>>> + goto irq_error;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>
>
>> <Suraj> We can not use "dev->name" as this is name already used by "stmmac_interrupt" @ https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1.68/source/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c#L3655.
>
> It's not that much of the problem. The main idea is to convert your
> solution to following the _local_ coding convention. See, the rest of
> the IRQs in stmmac_request_irq_single() are requested with "dev->name"
> being specified as the IRQ name (irrespective to having such solution
> being not that correct). That's what I was talking about. If you want
> the safety IRQ to have an unique name, then please submit this patch
> as I suggested above and _then_, on top of it, add a new patch which
> would convert the entire stmmac_request_irq_single() method to
> creating all IRQ names as it's, for instance, done in
> stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi().
>
>> <
>> ret = request_irq(dev->irq, stmmac_interrupt,
>> IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev);
>>>
>
>> if we are using same "dev->name" while requesting safety IRQ as well then "/proc/interrupt" will show same name eth0/eth1 for both "stmmac_interrupt" & "safety interrupt" and by looking at "/proc/interrupt" output we can not say which IRQ is for safety and which is for stmmac_interrupt.
>
> Thanks. I am perfectly aware of that. Please see my comment above.
>
>>>
>>> I guess at some point afterwards we'll need to refactor the IRQs
>>> request part of this driver: replace stmmac_request_irq_single() body
>>> with the upper part of the stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() method and
>>> then just make the former method being called from the later one...
>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> irq_error:
>>>> @@ -7462,8 +7481,10 @@ int stmmac_dvr_probe(struct device *device,
>>>> priv->dev->irq = res->irq;
>>>> priv->wol_irq = res->wol_irq;
>>>> priv->lpi_irq = res->lpi_irq;
>>>> + priv->sfty_irq = res->sfty_irq;
>>>> priv->sfty_ce_irq = res->sfty_ce_irq;
>>>> priv->sfty_ue_irq = res->sfty_ue_irq;
>>>
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Please drop this change. The code below is attached to the code above
>>> because it basically does the same but in the loop.
>
>> <Suraj> below loop code "for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++) priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];" is not for rx_irq array and will not help for safety irq.
>> Let me know if I got your commnet properly .
>
> Sorry, you didn't. My comment concerned the _empty_ line you placed
> between the code above and below. You shouldn't have done that.
>
>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_RX_QUEUES; i++)
>>>> priv->rx_irq[i] = res->rx_irq[i];
>>>> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>>>> index 1ffde555da47..3808a3225a7d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
>>>> @@ -726,6 +726,15 @@ int stmmac_get_platform_resources(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ eth_lpi not found\n");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + stmmac_res->sfty_irq =
>>>> + platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "sfty");
>>>
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Please drop this change too. It's normal to have a method call
>>> attached to the error check statement especially seeing the rest of
>>> the similar code snippets are designed that way in this function.
>
>> <Suraj> Do you means to remove all below code where we are printing the dev_info() message ?
>
> No. I was referring to the _empty_ line between the method above and
> the error check code below. It's pointless and at the very least
> breaks the local coding convention.
>
> -Serge(y)
>
>> We added this code similar to LPM code.
>>>
>>> -Serge(y)
>>>
>>>> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq < 0) {
>>>> + if (stmmac_res->sfty_irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>> + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "IRQ safety IRQ not found\n");
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> stmmac_res->addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>>>>
>>>> return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(stmmac_res->addr);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
>>>>
On Tue, 2023-12-12 at 17:28 +0530, Suraj Jaiswal wrote: > @@ -3759,6 +3763,7 @@ static int stmmac_request_irq_single(struct net_device *dev) > struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev); > enum request_irq_err irq_err; > int ret; > + char *int_name; I'm sorry to nit-pick, but please respect the reverse x-mas tree above, Otherwise LGTM! Cheers, Paolo
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.