.../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Some boards come with local-mac-address property. Allow it, and
mac-address as well, to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
apple/t8103-j456.dtb: network@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('local-mac-address' was unexpected)
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml
index 4aa521f1be8c..4c8a7950c83e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ properties:
description: Name for the OOB IRQ, this must be set to "host-wake".
const: host-wake
+ local-mac-address: true
+ mac-address: true
+
brcm,drive-strength:
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
description: Drive strength used for the SDIO pins on the device in mA.
@@ -148,6 +151,8 @@ examples:
interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
interrupt-names = "host-wake";
+ /* To be filled by the bootloader */
+ local-mac-address = [00 00 00 00 00 00];
reset-gpios = <&gpio 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
brcm,ccode-map = "JP-JP-78", "US-Q2-86";
};
--
2.34.1
On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 05:05:05PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Some boards come with local-mac-address property. Allow it, and
> mac-address as well, to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
>
> apple/t8103-j456.dtb: network@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('local-mac-address' was unexpected)
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml
> index 4aa521f1be8c..4c8a7950c83e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml
> @@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ properties:
> description: Name for the OOB IRQ, this must be set to "host-wake".
> const: host-wake
>
> + local-mac-address: true
> + mac-address: true
This doesn't work because the schema for these properties are never
applied. There was some work to split them out from
ethernet-controller.yaml to a network device schema[1]. Perhaps you can
revive that.
Rob
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230203-dt-bindings-network-class-v2-0-499686795073@jannau.net/#t
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> writes:
> Some boards come with local-mac-address property. Allow it, and
> mac-address as well, to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
>
> apple/t8103-j456.dtb: network@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('local-mac-address' was unexpected)
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
Wireless patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. But no need to
resend because of this.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
On 11/12/2023 14:19, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Some boards come with local-mac-address property. Allow it, and
>> mac-address as well, to fix dtbs_check warnings like:
>>
>> apple/t8103-j456.dtb: network@0,0: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('local-mac-address' was unexpected)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/brcm,bcm4329-fmac.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> Wireless patches go to wireless-next, not net-next. But no need to
> resend because of this.
I keep forgetting this... I'll write a note for myself.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.