Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
@@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops starfive_wdt_pm_ops = {
static const struct of_device_id starfive_wdt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant },
{ .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
+ { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, starfive_wdt_match);
--
2.25.1
On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
> JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops starfive_wdt_pm_ops = {
> static const struct of_device_id starfive_wdt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant },
> { .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> + { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
dropping this change?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:06:42 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> > Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
> > JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> > b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops
> > starfive_wdt_pm_ops = { static const struct of_device_id
> > starfive_wdt_match[] = { { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt",
> > .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant }, { .compatible =
> > "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> > + { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data =
> > &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
>
> Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
> dropping this change?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Ok, will drop this change.
Thanks,
Ji Sheng
On 2023/12/12 0:47, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:06:42 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
>> > Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
>> > JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
>> > b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5
>> > 100644 --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
>> > @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops
>> > starfive_wdt_pm_ops = { static const struct of_device_id
>> > starfive_wdt_match[] = { { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt",
>> > .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant }, { .compatible =
>> > "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
>> > + { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data =
>> > &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
>>
>> Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
>> dropping this change?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Ok, will drop this change.
>
> Thanks,
> Ji Sheng
Hi Ji Sheng,
You can add the compatible "starfive,jh8100-wdt" in the bindings and add this:
compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", "starfive,jh7110-wdt";
in the dts. I think it would be better and does not change the driver.
Best regards,
Xingyu Wu
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 11:01:21 +0800
Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@starfivetech.com> wrote:
> On 2023/12/12 0:47, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Dec 2023 11:06:42 +0100
> > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/12/2023 15:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> >> > Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100
> >> > watchdog. JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> >> > b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c index
> >> > 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5 100644 ---
> >> > a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c +++
> >> > b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static
> >> > const struct dev_pm_ops starfive_wdt_pm_ops = { static const
> >> > struct of_device_id starfive_wdt_match[] = { { .compatible =
> >> > "starfive,jh7100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant }, {
> >> > .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data =
> >> > &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> >> > + { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data =
> >> > &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> >>
> >> Device is compatible, so why not expressing it in the bindings and
> >> dropping this change?
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >
> > Ok, will drop this change.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ji Sheng
>
> Hi Ji Sheng,
>
> You can add the compatible "starfive,jh8100-wdt" in the bindings and
> add this:
>
> compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", "starfive,jh7110-wdt";
>
> in the dts. I think it would be better and does not change the driver.
>
> Best regards,
> Xingyu Wu
Thanks for the suggestion, will go with this approach.
I have respin a v2 for this, as it only requires small changes.
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231212031731.2498584-2-jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com/
On 12/9/23 06:27, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible for StarFive's JH8100 watchdog.
> JH8100 watchdog reuses JH7110 register mapping.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@starfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> index 5f501b41faf9..31785bb373d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/starfive-wdt.c
> @@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops starfive_wdt_pm_ops = {
> static const struct of_device_id starfive_wdt_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "starfive,jh7100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7100_variant },
> { .compatible = "starfive,jh7110-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> + { .compatible = "starfive,jh8100-wdt", .data = &starfive_wdt_jh7110_variant },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, starfive_wdt_match);
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.