[PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test

Yunsheng Lin posted 6 patches 9 months, 2 weeks ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Yunsheng Lin 9 months, 2 weeks ago
introduce vhost_net_test basing on virtio_test to test
vhost_net changing in the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
---
 tools/virtio/Makefile         |   8 +-
 tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c | 441 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 446 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c

diff --git a/tools/virtio/Makefile b/tools/virtio/Makefile
index d128925980e0..e25e99c1c3b7 100644
--- a/tools/virtio/Makefile
+++ b/tools/virtio/Makefile
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 all: test mod
-test: virtio_test vringh_test
+test: virtio_test vringh_test vhost_net_test
 virtio_test: virtio_ring.o virtio_test.o
 vringh_test: vringh_test.o vringh.o virtio_ring.o
+vhost_net_test: virtio_ring.o vhost_net_test.o
 
 try-run = $(shell set -e;		\
 	if ($(1)) >/dev/null 2>&1;	\
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ oot-clean: OOT_BUILD+=clean
 
 .PHONY: all test mod clean vhost oot oot-clean oot-build
 clean:
-	${RM} *.o vringh_test virtio_test vhost_test/*.o vhost_test/.*.cmd \
-              vhost_test/Module.symvers vhost_test/modules.order *.d
+	${RM} *.o vringh_test virtio_test vhost_net_test vhost_test/*.o \
+              vhost_test/.*.cmd vhost_test/Module.symvers \
+              vhost_test/modules.order *.d
 -include *.d
diff --git a/tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c b/tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7e7b7aba3668
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,441 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <getopt.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <poll.h>
+#include <sys/eventfd.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <assert.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+#include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <sys/types.h>
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <linux/virtio_types.h>
+#include <linux/vhost.h>
+#include <linux/virtio.h>
+#include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
+#include <linux/if.h>
+#include <linux/if_tun.h>
+
+#define RANDOM_BATCH -1
+
+static int tun_alloc(void)
+{
+	struct ifreq ifr;
+	int fd, e;
+
+	fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		perror("Cannot open /dev/net/tun");
+		return fd;
+	}
+
+	memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
+
+	ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TUN | IFF_NO_PI;
+	strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, "tun0", IFNAMSIZ);
+
+	e = ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *) &ifr);
+	if (e < 0) {
+		perror("ioctl[TUNSETIFF]");
+		close(fd);
+		return e;
+	}
+
+	return fd;
+}
+
+/* Unused */
+void *__kmalloc_fake, *__kfree_ignore_start, *__kfree_ignore_end;
+
+struct vq_info {
+	int kick;
+	int call;
+	int num;
+	int idx;
+	void *ring;
+	/* copy used for control */
+	struct vring vring;
+	struct virtqueue *vq;
+};
+
+struct vdev_info {
+	struct virtio_device vdev;
+	int control;
+	struct pollfd fds[1];
+	struct vq_info vqs[1];
+	int nvqs;
+	void *buf;
+	size_t buf_size;
+	struct vhost_memory *mem;
+};
+
+static struct vhost_vring_file no_backend = { .index = 1, .fd = -1 },
+				     backend = { .index = 1, .fd = 1 };
+static const struct vhost_vring_state null_state = {};
+
+bool vq_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
+{
+	struct vq_info *info = vq->priv;
+	unsigned long long v = 1;
+	int r;
+	r = write(info->kick, &v, sizeof v);
+	assert(r == sizeof v);
+	return true;
+}
+
+void vq_callback(struct virtqueue *vq)
+{
+}
+
+
+void vhost_vq_setup(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *info)
+{
+	struct vhost_vring_state state = { .index = info->idx };
+	struct vhost_vring_file file = { .index = info->idx };
+	unsigned long long features = dev->vdev.features;
+	struct vhost_vring_addr addr = {
+		.index = info->idx,
+		.desc_user_addr = (uint64_t)(unsigned long)info->vring.desc,
+		.avail_user_addr = (uint64_t)(unsigned long)info->vring.avail,
+		.used_user_addr = (uint64_t)(unsigned long)info->vring.used,
+	};
+	int r;
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_FEATURES, &features);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	state.num = info->vring.num;
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM, &state);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	state.num = 0;
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE, &state);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_ADDR, &addr);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	file.fd = info->kick;
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_KICK, &file);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	file.fd = info->call;
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL, &file);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+}
+
+static void vq_reset(struct vq_info *info, int num, struct virtio_device *vdev)
+{
+	if (info->vq)
+		vring_del_virtqueue(info->vq);
+
+	memset(info->ring, 0, vring_size(num, 4096));
+	vring_init(&info->vring, num, info->ring, 4096);
+	info->vq = vring_new_virtqueue(info->idx, num, 4096, vdev, true, false,
+				       info->ring, vq_notify, vq_callback, "test");
+	assert(info->vq);
+	info->vq->priv = info;
+}
+
+static void vq_info_add(struct vdev_info *dev, int num)
+{
+	struct vq_info *info = &dev->vqs[dev->nvqs];
+	int r;
+
+	/* use VHOST_NET_VQ_TX for testing */
+	info->idx = 1;
+	info->kick = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
+	info->call = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
+	r = posix_memalign(&info->ring, 4096, vring_size(num, 4096));
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	vq_reset(info, num, &dev->vdev);
+	vhost_vq_setup(dev, info);
+	dev->fds[0].fd = info->call;
+	dev->fds[0].events = POLLIN;
+	dev->nvqs++;
+}
+
+static void vdev_info_init(struct vdev_info* dev, unsigned long long features)
+{
+	int r;
+	memset(dev, 0, sizeof *dev);
+	dev->vdev.features = features;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vdev.vqs);
+	spin_lock_init(&dev->vdev.vqs_list_lock);
+	dev->buf_size = 1024;
+	dev->buf = malloc(dev->buf_size);
+	assert(dev->buf);
+	dev->control = open("/dev/vhost-net", O_RDWR);
+	assert(dev->control >= 0);
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_OWNER, NULL);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+	dev->mem = malloc(offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
+			  sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]);
+	assert(dev->mem);
+	memset(dev->mem, 0, offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
+                          sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]);
+	dev->mem->nregions = 1;
+	dev->mem->regions[0].guest_phys_addr = (long)dev->buf;
+	dev->mem->regions[0].userspace_addr = (long)dev->buf;
+	dev->mem->regions[0].memory_size = dev->buf_size;
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE, dev->mem);
+	assert(r >= 0);
+}
+
+/* TODO: this is pretty bad: we get a cache line bounce
+ * for the wait queue on poll and another one on read,
+ * plus the read which is there just to clear the
+ * current state. */
+static void wait_for_interrupt(struct vdev_info *dev)
+{
+	int i;
+	unsigned long long val;
+	poll(dev->fds, dev->nvqs, -1);
+	for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i)
+		if (dev->fds[i].revents & POLLIN) {
+			read(dev->fds[i].fd, &val, sizeof val);
+		}
+}
+
+static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
+		     bool delayed, int batch, int reset_n, int bufs)
+{
+	struct scatterlist sl;
+	long started = 0, completed = 0, next_reset = reset_n;
+	long completed_before, started_before;
+	int r;
+	unsigned int len;
+	long long spurious = 0;
+	const bool random_batch = batch == RANDOM_BATCH;
+
+	r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND, &backend);
+	assert(!r);
+
+	if (!reset_n) {
+		next_reset = INT_MAX;
+	}
+
+	for (;;) {
+		virtqueue_disable_cb(vq->vq);
+		completed_before = completed;
+		started_before = started;
+		do {
+			const bool reset = completed > next_reset;
+			if (random_batch)
+				batch = (random() % vq->vring.num) + 1;
+
+			while (started < bufs &&
+			       (started - completed) < batch) {
+				sg_init_one(&sl, dev->buf, dev->buf_size);
+				r = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq->vq, &sl, 1,
+							 dev->buf + started,
+							 GFP_ATOMIC);
+				if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
+					if (r == -ENOSPC &&
+					    started > started_before)
+						r = 0;
+					else
+						r = -1;
+					break;
+				}
+
+				++started;
+
+				if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vq->vq))) {
+					r = -1;
+					break;
+				}
+			}
+
+			if (started >= bufs)
+				r = -1;
+
+			if (reset) {
+				r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND,
+					  &no_backend);
+				assert(!r);
+			}
+
+			/* Flush out completed bufs if any */
+			while (virtqueue_get_buf(vq->vq, &len)) {
+				++completed;
+				r = 0;
+			}
+
+			if (reset) {
+				struct vhost_vring_state s = { .index = 0 };
+
+				vq_reset(vq, vq->vring.num, &dev->vdev);
+
+				r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE,
+					  &s);
+				assert(!r);
+
+				s.num = 0;
+				r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE,
+					  &null_state);
+				assert(!r);
+
+				r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND,
+					  &backend);
+				assert(!r);
+
+				started = completed;
+				while (completed > next_reset)
+					next_reset += completed;
+			}
+		} while (r == 0);
+		if (completed == completed_before && started == started_before)
+			++spurious;
+		assert(completed <= bufs);
+		assert(started <= bufs);
+		if (completed == bufs)
+			break;
+		if (delayed) {
+			if (virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vq->vq))
+				wait_for_interrupt(dev);
+		} else {
+			if (virtqueue_enable_cb(vq->vq))
+				wait_for_interrupt(dev);
+		}
+	}
+	fprintf(stderr,
+		"spurious wakeups: 0x%llx started=0x%lx completed=0x%lx\n",
+		spurious, started, completed);
+}
+
+const char optstring[] = "h";
+const struct option longopts[] = {
+	{
+		.name = "help",
+		.val = 'h',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "event-idx",
+		.val = 'E',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "no-event-idx",
+		.val = 'e',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "indirect",
+		.val = 'I',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "no-indirect",
+		.val = 'i',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "virtio-1",
+		.val = '1',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "no-virtio-1",
+		.val = '0',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "delayed-interrupt",
+		.val = 'D',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "no-delayed-interrupt",
+		.val = 'd',
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "buf-num",
+		.val = 'n',
+		.has_arg = required_argument,
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "batch",
+		.val = 'b',
+		.has_arg = required_argument,
+	},
+	{
+		.name = "reset",
+		.val = 'r',
+		.has_arg = optional_argument,
+	},
+	{
+	}
+};
+
+static void help(int status)
+{
+	fprintf(stderr, "Usage: virtio_test [--help]"
+		" [--no-indirect]"
+		" [--no-event-idx]"
+		" [--no-virtio-1]"
+		" [--delayed-interrupt]"
+		" [--batch=random/N]"
+		" [--reset=N]"
+		"\n");
+
+	exit(status);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+	struct vdev_info dev;
+	unsigned long long features = (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
+		(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX) | (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+	long batch = 1, reset = 0, nbufs = 0x100000;
+	int o;
+	bool delayed = false;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		o = getopt_long(argc, argv, optstring, longopts, NULL);
+		switch (o) {
+		case -1:
+			goto done;
+		case '?':
+			help(2);
+		case 'e':
+			features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX);
+			break;
+		case 'h':
+			help(0);
+		case 'i':
+			features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
+			break;
+		case '0':
+			features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
+			break;
+		case 'D':
+			delayed = true;
+			break;
+		case 'b':
+			if (0 == strcmp(optarg, "random")) {
+				batch = RANDOM_BATCH;
+			} else {
+				batch = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
+				assert(batch > 0);
+				assert(batch < (long)INT_MAX + 1);
+			}
+			break;
+		case 'r':
+			if (!optarg) {
+				reset = 1;
+			} else {
+				reset = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
+				assert(reset > 0);
+				assert(reset < (long)INT_MAX + 1);
+			}
+			break;
+		case 'n':
+			nbufs = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
+			assert(nbufs > 0);
+			break;
+		default:
+			assert(0);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+done:
+	backend.fd = tun_alloc();
+	assert(backend.fd >= 0);
+	vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
+	vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
+	run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
+	return 0;
+}
-- 
2.33.0
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Jason Wang 9 months, 2 weeks ago
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:35 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> introduce vhost_net_test basing on virtio_test to test
> vhost_net changing in the kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
> ---
>  tools/virtio/Makefile         |   8 +-
>  tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c | 441 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 446 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/virtio/Makefile b/tools/virtio/Makefile
> index d128925980e0..e25e99c1c3b7 100644
> --- a/tools/virtio/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/virtio/Makefile
> @@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
>  # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>  all: test mod
> -test: virtio_test vringh_test
> +test: virtio_test vringh_test vhost_net_test
>  virtio_test: virtio_ring.o virtio_test.o
>  vringh_test: vringh_test.o vringh.o virtio_ring.o
> +vhost_net_test: virtio_ring.o vhost_net_test.o
>
>  try-run = $(shell set -e;              \
>         if ($(1)) >/dev/null 2>&1;      \
> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ oot-clean: OOT_BUILD+=clean
>
>  .PHONY: all test mod clean vhost oot oot-clean oot-build
>  clean:
> -       ${RM} *.o vringh_test virtio_test vhost_test/*.o vhost_test/.*.cmd \
> -              vhost_test/Module.symvers vhost_test/modules.order *.d
> +       ${RM} *.o vringh_test virtio_test vhost_net_test vhost_test/*.o \
> +              vhost_test/.*.cmd vhost_test/Module.symvers \
> +              vhost_test/modules.order *.d
>  -include *.d
> diff --git a/tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c b/tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7e7b7aba3668
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/virtio/vhost_net_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,441 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <getopt.h>
> +#include <limits.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +#include <poll.h>
> +#include <sys/eventfd.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <assert.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <sys/ioctl.h>
> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> +#include <sys/types.h>
> +#include <fcntl.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_types.h>
> +#include <linux/vhost.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio.h>
> +#include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> +#include <linux/if.h>
> +#include <linux/if_tun.h>
> +
> +#define RANDOM_BATCH -1
> +
> +static int tun_alloc(void)
> +{
> +       struct ifreq ifr;
> +       int fd, e;
> +
> +       fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR);
> +       if (fd < 0) {
> +               perror("Cannot open /dev/net/tun");
> +               return fd;
> +       }
> +
> +       memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
> +
> +       ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TUN | IFF_NO_PI;

Why did you use IFF_TUN but not IFF_TAP here?

> +       strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, "tun0", IFNAMSIZ);

tun0 is pretty common if there's a VPN. Do we need some randomized name here?


> +
> +       e = ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *) &ifr);
> +       if (e < 0) {
> +               perror("ioctl[TUNSETIFF]");
> +               close(fd);
> +               return e;
> +       }
> +
> +       return fd;
> +}
> +
> +/* Unused */
> +void *__kmalloc_fake, *__kfree_ignore_start, *__kfree_ignore_end;

Why do we need trick like these here?

> +
> +struct vq_info {
> +       int kick;
> +       int call;
> +       int num;
> +       int idx;
> +       void *ring;
> +       /* copy used for control */
> +       struct vring vring;
> +       struct virtqueue *vq;
> +};
> +
> +struct vdev_info {
> +       struct virtio_device vdev;
> +       int control;
> +       struct pollfd fds[1];
> +       struct vq_info vqs[1];
> +       int nvqs;
> +       void *buf;
> +       size_t buf_size;
> +       struct vhost_memory *mem;
> +};
> +
> +static struct vhost_vring_file no_backend = { .index = 1, .fd = -1 },
> +                                    backend = { .index = 1, .fd = 1 };

A magic number like fd = 1 is pretty confusing.

And I don't see why we need global variables here.

> +static const struct vhost_vring_state null_state = {};
> +
> +bool vq_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +       struct vq_info *info = vq->priv;
> +       unsigned long long v = 1;
> +       int r;
> +       r = write(info->kick, &v, sizeof v);
> +       assert(r == sizeof v);
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +void vq_callback(struct virtqueue *vq)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +
> +void vhost_vq_setup(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *info)
> +{
> +       struct vhost_vring_state state = { .index = info->idx };
> +       struct vhost_vring_file file = { .index = info->idx };
> +       unsigned long long features = dev->vdev.features;
> +       struct vhost_vring_addr addr = {
> +               .index = info->idx,
> +               .desc_user_addr = (uint64_t)(unsigned long)info->vring.desc,
> +               .avail_user_addr = (uint64_t)(unsigned long)info->vring.avail,
> +               .used_user_addr = (uint64_t)(unsigned long)info->vring.used,
> +       };
> +       int r;
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_FEATURES, &features);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       state.num = info->vring.num;
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_NUM, &state);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       state.num = 0;
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE, &state);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_ADDR, &addr);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       file.fd = info->kick;
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_KICK, &file);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       file.fd = info->call;
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_CALL, &file);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +}
> +
> +static void vq_reset(struct vq_info *info, int num, struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +       if (info->vq)
> +               vring_del_virtqueue(info->vq);
> +
> +       memset(info->ring, 0, vring_size(num, 4096));
> +       vring_init(&info->vring, num, info->ring, 4096);
> +       info->vq = vring_new_virtqueue(info->idx, num, 4096, vdev, true, false,
> +                                      info->ring, vq_notify, vq_callback, "test");
> +       assert(info->vq);
> +       info->vq->priv = info;
> +}
> +
> +static void vq_info_add(struct vdev_info *dev, int num)
> +{
> +       struct vq_info *info = &dev->vqs[dev->nvqs];
> +       int r;
> +
> +       /* use VHOST_NET_VQ_TX for testing */
> +       info->idx = 1;
> +       info->kick = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
> +       info->call = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
> +       r = posix_memalign(&info->ring, 4096, vring_size(num, 4096));
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       vq_reset(info, num, &dev->vdev);
> +       vhost_vq_setup(dev, info);
> +       dev->fds[0].fd = info->call;
> +       dev->fds[0].events = POLLIN;
> +       dev->nvqs++;
> +}
> +
> +static void vdev_info_init(struct vdev_info* dev, unsigned long long features)
> +{
> +       int r;
> +       memset(dev, 0, sizeof *dev);
> +       dev->vdev.features = features;
> +       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vdev.vqs);
> +       spin_lock_init(&dev->vdev.vqs_list_lock);
> +       dev->buf_size = 1024;
> +       dev->buf = malloc(dev->buf_size);
> +       assert(dev->buf);
> +       dev->control = open("/dev/vhost-net", O_RDWR);
> +       assert(dev->control >= 0);
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_OWNER, NULL);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +       dev->mem = malloc(offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
> +                         sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]);
> +       assert(dev->mem);
> +       memset(dev->mem, 0, offsetof(struct vhost_memory, regions) +
> +                          sizeof dev->mem->regions[0]);
> +       dev->mem->nregions = 1;
> +       dev->mem->regions[0].guest_phys_addr = (long)dev->buf;
> +       dev->mem->regions[0].userspace_addr = (long)dev->buf;
> +       dev->mem->regions[0].memory_size = dev->buf_size;
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE, dev->mem);
> +       assert(r >= 0);
> +}
> +
> +/* TODO: this is pretty bad: we get a cache line bounce
> + * for the wait queue on poll and another one on read,
> + * plus the read which is there just to clear the
> + * current state. */
> +static void wait_for_interrupt(struct vdev_info *dev)
> +{
> +       int i;
> +       unsigned long long val;
> +       poll(dev->fds, dev->nvqs, -1);
> +       for (i = 0; i < dev->nvqs; ++i)
> +               if (dev->fds[i].revents & POLLIN) {
> +                       read(dev->fds[i].fd, &val, sizeof val);
> +               }
> +}
> +
> +static void run_test(struct vdev_info *dev, struct vq_info *vq,
> +                    bool delayed, int batch, int reset_n, int bufs)
> +{
> +       struct scatterlist sl;
> +       long started = 0, completed = 0, next_reset = reset_n;
> +       long completed_before, started_before;
> +       int r;
> +       unsigned int len;
> +       long long spurious = 0;
> +       const bool random_batch = batch == RANDOM_BATCH;
> +
> +       r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND, &backend);
> +       assert(!r);
> +
> +       if (!reset_n) {
> +               next_reset = INT_MAX;
> +       }
> +
> +       for (;;) {
> +               virtqueue_disable_cb(vq->vq);
> +               completed_before = completed;
> +               started_before = started;
> +               do {
> +                       const bool reset = completed > next_reset;
> +                       if (random_batch)
> +                               batch = (random() % vq->vring.num) + 1;
> +
> +                       while (started < bufs &&
> +                              (started - completed) < batch) {
> +                               sg_init_one(&sl, dev->buf, dev->buf_size);
> +                               r = virtqueue_add_outbuf(vq->vq, &sl, 1,
> +                                                        dev->buf + started,
> +                                                        GFP_ATOMIC);
> +                               if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
> +                                       if (r == -ENOSPC &&
> +                                           started > started_before)
> +                                               r = 0;
> +                                       else
> +                                               r = -1;
> +                                       break;
> +                               }
> +
> +                               ++started;
> +
> +                               if (unlikely(!virtqueue_kick(vq->vq))) {
> +                                       r = -1;
> +                                       break;
> +                               }
> +                       }
> +
> +                       if (started >= bufs)
> +                               r = -1;
> +
> +                       if (reset) {
> +                               r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND,
> +                                         &no_backend);
> +                               assert(!r);
> +                       }
> +
> +                       /* Flush out completed bufs if any */
> +                       while (virtqueue_get_buf(vq->vq, &len)) {
> +                               ++completed;
> +                               r = 0;
> +                       }
> +
> +                       if (reset) {
> +                               struct vhost_vring_state s = { .index = 0 };
> +
> +                               vq_reset(vq, vq->vring.num, &dev->vdev);
> +
> +                               r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE,
> +                                         &s);
> +                               assert(!r);
> +
> +                               s.num = 0;
> +                               r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE,
> +                                         &null_state);
> +                               assert(!r);
> +
> +                               r = ioctl(dev->control, VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND,
> +                                         &backend);
> +                               assert(!r);
> +
> +                               started = completed;
> +                               while (completed > next_reset)
> +                                       next_reset += completed;
> +                       }
> +               } while (r == 0);
> +               if (completed == completed_before && started == started_before)
> +                       ++spurious;
> +               assert(completed <= bufs);
> +               assert(started <= bufs);
> +               if (completed == bufs)
> +                       break;
> +               if (delayed) {
> +                       if (virtqueue_enable_cb_delayed(vq->vq))
> +                               wait_for_interrupt(dev);
> +               } else {
> +                       if (virtqueue_enable_cb(vq->vq))
> +                               wait_for_interrupt(dev);
> +               }
> +       }
> +       fprintf(stderr,
> +               "spurious wakeups: 0x%llx started=0x%lx completed=0x%lx\n",
> +               spurious, started, completed);
> +}
> +
> +const char optstring[] = "h";
> +const struct option longopts[] = {
> +       {
> +               .name = "help",
> +               .val = 'h',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "event-idx",
> +               .val = 'E',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "no-event-idx",
> +               .val = 'e',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "indirect",
> +               .val = 'I',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "no-indirect",
> +               .val = 'i',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "virtio-1",
> +               .val = '1',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "no-virtio-1",
> +               .val = '0',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "delayed-interrupt",
> +               .val = 'D',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "no-delayed-interrupt",
> +               .val = 'd',
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "buf-num",
> +               .val = 'n',
> +               .has_arg = required_argument,
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "batch",
> +               .val = 'b',
> +               .has_arg = required_argument,
> +       },
> +       {
> +               .name = "reset",
> +               .val = 'r',
> +               .has_arg = optional_argument,
> +       },
> +       {
> +       }
> +};
> +
> +static void help(int status)
> +{
> +       fprintf(stderr, "Usage: virtio_test [--help]"
> +               " [--no-indirect]"
> +               " [--no-event-idx]"
> +               " [--no-virtio-1]"
> +               " [--delayed-interrupt]"
> +               " [--batch=random/N]"
> +               " [--reset=N]"
> +               "\n");
> +
> +       exit(status);
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> +{
> +       struct vdev_info dev;
> +       unsigned long long features = (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
> +               (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX) | (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
> +       long batch = 1, reset = 0, nbufs = 0x100000;
> +       int o;
> +       bool delayed = false;
> +
> +       for (;;) {
> +               o = getopt_long(argc, argv, optstring, longopts, NULL);
> +               switch (o) {
> +               case -1:
> +                       goto done;
> +               case '?':
> +                       help(2);
> +               case 'e':
> +                       features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX);
> +                       break;
> +               case 'h':
> +                       help(0);
> +               case 'i':
> +                       features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC);
> +                       break;
> +               case '0':
> +                       features &= ~(1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1);
> +                       break;
> +               case 'D':
> +                       delayed = true;
> +                       break;
> +               case 'b':
> +                       if (0 == strcmp(optarg, "random")) {
> +                               batch = RANDOM_BATCH;
> +                       } else {
> +                               batch = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
> +                               assert(batch > 0);
> +                               assert(batch < (long)INT_MAX + 1);
> +                       }
> +                       break;
> +               case 'r':
> +                       if (!optarg) {
> +                               reset = 1;
> +                       } else {
> +                               reset = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
> +                               assert(reset > 0);
> +                               assert(reset < (long)INT_MAX + 1);
> +                       }
> +                       break;
> +               case 'n':
> +                       nbufs = strtol(optarg, NULL, 10);
> +                       assert(nbufs > 0);
> +                       break;
> +               default:
> +                       assert(0);
> +                       break;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +done:
> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);

I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?

Thanks

> +       return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.33.0
>
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Yunsheng Lin 9 months, 2 weeks ago
On 2023/12/7 14:00, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:35 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
...

>> +
>> +static int tun_alloc(void)
>> +{
>> +       struct ifreq ifr;
>> +       int fd, e;
>> +
>> +       fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR);
>> +       if (fd < 0) {
>> +               perror("Cannot open /dev/net/tun");
>> +               return fd;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
>> +
>> +       ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TUN | IFF_NO_PI;
> 
> Why did you use IFF_TUN but not IFF_TAP here?

To be honest, no particular reason, I just picked IFF_TUN and it happened
to work for me to test changing in vhost_net_build_xdp().

Is there a particular reason you perfer the IFF_TAP over IFF_TUN?

> 
>> +       strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, "tun0", IFNAMSIZ);
> 
> tun0 is pretty common if there's a VPN. Do we need some randomized name here?

How about something like below?

snprintf(ifr.ifr_name, IFNAMSIZ, "tun_%d", getpid());

> 
> 
>> +
>> +       e = ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *) &ifr);
>> +       if (e < 0) {
>> +               perror("ioctl[TUNSETIFF]");
>> +               close(fd);
>> +               return e;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       return fd;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Unused */
>> +void *__kmalloc_fake, *__kfree_ignore_start, *__kfree_ignore_end;
> 
> Why do we need trick like these here?

That is because of the below error:
tools/virtio/./linux/kernel.h:58: undefined reference to `__kmalloc_fake'

when virtio_ring.c is compiled in the userspace, the kmalloc raleted function
is implemented in tools/virtio/./linux/kernel.h, which requires those varibles
to be defined.

> 
>> +
>> +struct vq_info {
>> +       int kick;
>> +       int call;
>> +       int num;
>> +       int idx;
>> +       void *ring;
>> +       /* copy used for control */
>> +       struct vring vring;
>> +       struct virtqueue *vq;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct vdev_info {
>> +       struct virtio_device vdev;
>> +       int control;
>> +       struct pollfd fds[1];
>> +       struct vq_info vqs[1];
>> +       int nvqs;
>> +       void *buf;
>> +       size_t buf_size;
>> +       struct vhost_memory *mem;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct vhost_vring_file no_backend = { .index = 1, .fd = -1 },
>> +                                    backend = { .index = 1, .fd = 1 };
> 
> A magic number like fd = 1 is pretty confusing.
> 
> And I don't see why we need global variables here.

I was using the virtio_test.c as reference, will try to remove it
if it is possible.

> 
>> +static const struct vhost_vring_state null_state = {};
>> +

..

>> +
>> +done:
>> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
>> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
>> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
>> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
>> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
> 
> I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
> packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?

Yes, only rx for tun is tested.
Do you have an idea how to test the tx too? As I am not familar enough
with vhost_net and tun yet.

> 
> Thanks
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Jason Wang 9 months, 1 week ago
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 7:28 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023/12/7 14:00, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 7:35 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
> ...
>
> >> +
> >> +static int tun_alloc(void)
> >> +{
> >> +       struct ifreq ifr;
> >> +       int fd, e;
> >> +
> >> +       fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR);
> >> +       if (fd < 0) {
> >> +               perror("Cannot open /dev/net/tun");
> >> +               return fd;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
> >> +
> >> +       ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TUN | IFF_NO_PI;
> >
> > Why did you use IFF_TUN but not IFF_TAP here?
>
> To be honest, no particular reason, I just picked IFF_TUN and it happened
> to work for me to test changing in vhost_net_build_xdp().
>
> Is there a particular reason you perfer the IFF_TAP over IFF_TUN?

No preference here. It only matters if you want to test L2 or L3.


>
> >
> >> +       strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, "tun0", IFNAMSIZ);
> >
> > tun0 is pretty common if there's a VPN. Do we need some randomized name here?
>
> How about something like below?
>
> snprintf(ifr.ifr_name, IFNAMSIZ, "tun_%d", getpid());
>
> >
> >
> >> +
> >> +       e = ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *) &ifr);
> >> +       if (e < 0) {
> >> +               perror("ioctl[TUNSETIFF]");
> >> +               close(fd);
> >> +               return e;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >> +       return fd;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/* Unused */
> >> +void *__kmalloc_fake, *__kfree_ignore_start, *__kfree_ignore_end;
> >
> > Why do we need trick like these here?
>
> That is because of the below error:
> tools/virtio/./linux/kernel.h:58: undefined reference to `__kmalloc_fake'
>
> when virtio_ring.c is compiled in the userspace, the kmalloc raleted function
> is implemented in tools/virtio/./linux/kernel.h, which requires those varibles
> to be defined.
>
> >
> >> +
> >> +struct vq_info {
> >> +       int kick;
> >> +       int call;
> >> +       int num;
> >> +       int idx;
> >> +       void *ring;
> >> +       /* copy used for control */
> >> +       struct vring vring;
> >> +       struct virtqueue *vq;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +struct vdev_info {
> >> +       struct virtio_device vdev;
> >> +       int control;
> >> +       struct pollfd fds[1];
> >> +       struct vq_info vqs[1];
> >> +       int nvqs;
> >> +       void *buf;
> >> +       size_t buf_size;
> >> +       struct vhost_memory *mem;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static struct vhost_vring_file no_backend = { .index = 1, .fd = -1 },
> >> +                                    backend = { .index = 1, .fd = 1 };
> >
> > A magic number like fd = 1 is pretty confusing.
> >
> > And I don't see why we need global variables here.
>
> I was using the virtio_test.c as reference, will try to remove it
> if it is possible.
>
> >
> >> +static const struct vhost_vring_state null_state = {};
> >> +
>
> ..
>
> >> +
> >> +done:
> >> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
> >> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
> >> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
> >> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
> >> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
> >
> > I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
> > packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?
>
> Yes, only rx for tun is tested.
> Do you have an idea how to test the tx too? As I am not familar enough
> with vhost_net and tun yet.

Maybe you can have a packet socket to bind to the tun/tap. Then you can test:

1) TAP RX: by write a packet via virtqueue through vhost_net and read
it from packet socket
2) TAP TX:  by write via packet socket and read it from the virtqueue
through vhost_net

Thanks

>
> >
> > Thanks
>
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Yunsheng Lin 9 months ago
On 2023/12/12 12:35, Jason Wang wrote:>>>> +done:
>>>> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
>>>> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
>>>> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
>>>> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
>>>> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
>>>
>>> I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
>>> packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?
>>
>> Yes, only rx for tun is tested.
>> Do you have an idea how to test the tx too? As I am not familar enough
>> with vhost_net and tun yet.
> 
> Maybe you can have a packet socket to bind to the tun/tap. Then you can test:
> 
> 1) TAP RX: by write a packet via virtqueue through vhost_net and read
> it from packet socket
> 2) TAP TX:  by write via packet socket and read it from the virtqueue
> through vhost_net

When implementing the TAP TX by adding VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR,
I found one possible use of uninitialized data in vhost_net_build_xdp().

And vhost_hlen is set to sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf) and
sock_hlen is set to zero in vhost_net_set_features() for both tx and rx
queue.

For vhost_net_build_xdp() called by handle_tx_copy():

The (gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) checking below may cause a
read of uninitialized data if sock_hlen is zero.

And it seems vhost_hdr is skipped in get_tx_bufs():
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/vhost/net.c#L616

static int vhost_net_build_xdp(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
			       struct iov_iter *from)
{
...
	buflen += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + pad);
	alloc_frag->offset = ALIGN((u64)alloc_frag->offset, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
	if (unlikely(!vhost_net_page_frag_refill(net, buflen,
						 alloc_frag, GFP_KERNEL)))
		return -ENOMEM;

	buf = (char *)page_address(alloc_frag->page) + alloc_frag->offset;
	copied = copy_page_from_iter(alloc_frag->page,
				     alloc_frag->offset +
				     offsetof(struct tun_xdp_hdr, gso),
				     sock_hlen, from);
	if (copied != sock_hlen)
		return -EFAULT;

	hdr = buf;
	gso = &hdr->gso;

	if ((gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) &&
	    vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_start) +
	    vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_offset) + 2 >
	    vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->hdr_len)) {
...
}

I seems the handle_tx_copy() does not handle the VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR
case correctly, Or do I miss something obvious here?

> 
> Thanks
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>
> 
> .
>
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Jason Wang 9 months ago
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:45 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023/12/12 12:35, Jason Wang wrote:>>>> +done:
> >>>> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
> >>>> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
> >>>> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
> >>>> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
> >>>> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
> >>>
> >>> I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
> >>> packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?
> >>
> >> Yes, only rx for tun is tested.
> >> Do you have an idea how to test the tx too? As I am not familar enough
> >> with vhost_net and tun yet.
> >
> > Maybe you can have a packet socket to bind to the tun/tap. Then you can test:
> >
> > 1) TAP RX: by write a packet via virtqueue through vhost_net and read
> > it from packet socket
> > 2) TAP TX:  by write via packet socket and read it from the virtqueue
> > through vhost_net
>
> When implementing the TAP TX by adding VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR,
> I found one possible use of uninitialized data in vhost_net_build_xdp().
>
> And vhost_hlen is set to sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf) and
> sock_hlen is set to zero in vhost_net_set_features() for both tx and rx
> queue.
>
> For vhost_net_build_xdp() called by handle_tx_copy():
>
> The (gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) checking below may cause a
> read of uninitialized data if sock_hlen is zero.

Which data is uninitialized here?

>
> And it seems vhost_hdr is skipped in get_tx_bufs():
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/vhost/net.c#L616
>
> static int vhost_net_build_xdp(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
>                                struct iov_iter *from)
> {
> ...
>         buflen += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + pad);
>         alloc_frag->offset = ALIGN((u64)alloc_frag->offset, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
>         if (unlikely(!vhost_net_page_frag_refill(net, buflen,
>                                                  alloc_frag, GFP_KERNEL)))
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
>         buf = (char *)page_address(alloc_frag->page) + alloc_frag->offset;
>         copied = copy_page_from_iter(alloc_frag->page,
>                                      alloc_frag->offset +
>                                      offsetof(struct tun_xdp_hdr, gso),
>                                      sock_hlen, from);
>         if (copied != sock_hlen)
>                 return -EFAULT;
>
>         hdr = buf;
>         gso = &hdr->gso;
>
>         if ((gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) &&
>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_start) +
>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_offset) + 2 >
>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->hdr_len)) {
> ...
> }
>
> I seems the handle_tx_copy() does not handle the VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR
> case correctly, Or do I miss something obvious here?

In get_tx_bufs() we did:

        *len = init_iov_iter(vq, &msg->msg_iter, nvq->vhost_hlen, *out);

Which covers this case?

Thanks

>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>
> >
> > .
> >
>
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Yunsheng Lin 9 months ago
On 2023/12/21 10:33, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:45 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023/12/12 12:35, Jason Wang wrote:>>>> +done:
>>>>>> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
>>>>>> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
>>>>>> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
>>>>>> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
>>>>>> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
>>>>> packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?
>>>>
>>>> Yes, only rx for tun is tested.
>>>> Do you have an idea how to test the tx too? As I am not familar enough
>>>> with vhost_net and tun yet.
>>>
>>> Maybe you can have a packet socket to bind to the tun/tap. Then you can test:
>>>
>>> 1) TAP RX: by write a packet via virtqueue through vhost_net and read
>>> it from packet socket
>>> 2) TAP TX:  by write via packet socket and read it from the virtqueue
>>> through vhost_net
>>
>> When implementing the TAP TX by adding VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR,
>> I found one possible use of uninitialized data in vhost_net_build_xdp().
>>
>> And vhost_hlen is set to sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf) and
>> sock_hlen is set to zero in vhost_net_set_features() for both tx and rx
>> queue.
>>
>> For vhost_net_build_xdp() called by handle_tx_copy():
>>
>> The (gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) checking below may cause a
>> read of uninitialized data if sock_hlen is zero.
> 
> Which data is uninitialized here?

The 'gso', as the sock_hlen is zero, there is no copying for:

         copied = copy_page_from_iter(alloc_frag->page,
                                      alloc_frag->offset +
                                      offsetof(struct tun_xdp_hdr, gso),
                                      sock_hlen, from);

> 
>>
>> And it seems vhost_hdr is skipped in get_tx_bufs():
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/vhost/net.c#L616
>>
>> static int vhost_net_build_xdp(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
>>                                struct iov_iter *from)
>> {
>> ...
>>         buflen += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + pad);
>>         alloc_frag->offset = ALIGN((u64)alloc_frag->offset, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
>>         if (unlikely(!vhost_net_page_frag_refill(net, buflen,
>>                                                  alloc_frag, GFP_KERNEL)))
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         buf = (char *)page_address(alloc_frag->page) + alloc_frag->offset;
>>         copied = copy_page_from_iter(alloc_frag->page,
>>                                      alloc_frag->offset +
>>                                      offsetof(struct tun_xdp_hdr, gso),
>>                                      sock_hlen, from);
>>         if (copied != sock_hlen)
>>                 return -EFAULT;
>>
>>         hdr = buf;
>>         gso = &hdr->gso;
>>
>>         if ((gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) &&
>>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_start) +
>>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_offset) + 2 >
>>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->hdr_len)) {
>> ...
>> }
>>
>> I seems the handle_tx_copy() does not handle the VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR
>> case correctly, Or do I miss something obvious here?
> 
> In get_tx_bufs() we did:
> 
>         *len = init_iov_iter(vq, &msg->msg_iter, nvq->vhost_hlen, *out);
> 
> Which covers this case?

It does not seems to cover it, as the vhost_hdr is just skipped without any
handling in get_tx_bufs():
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/vhost/net.c#L616

> 
> Thanks
Re: [PATCH net-next 6/6] tools: virtio: introduce vhost_net_test
Posted by Jason Wang 9 months ago
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:48 AM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On 2023/12/21 10:33, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 8:45 PM Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2023/12/12 12:35, Jason Wang wrote:>>>> +done:
> >>>>>> +       backend.fd = tun_alloc();
> >>>>>> +       assert(backend.fd >= 0);
> >>>>>> +       vdev_info_init(&dev, features);
> >>>>>> +       vq_info_add(&dev, 256);
> >>>>>> +       run_test(&dev, &dev.vqs[0], delayed, batch, reset, nbufs);
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'd expect we are testing some basic traffic here. E.g can we use a
> >>>>> packet socket then we can test both tx and rx?
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, only rx for tun is tested.
> >>>> Do you have an idea how to test the tx too? As I am not familar enough
> >>>> with vhost_net and tun yet.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe you can have a packet socket to bind to the tun/tap. Then you can test:
> >>>
> >>> 1) TAP RX: by write a packet via virtqueue through vhost_net and read
> >>> it from packet socket
> >>> 2) TAP TX:  by write via packet socket and read it from the virtqueue
> >>> through vhost_net
> >>
> >> When implementing the TAP TX by adding VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR,
> >> I found one possible use of uninitialized data in vhost_net_build_xdp().
> >>
> >> And vhost_hlen is set to sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf) and
> >> sock_hlen is set to zero in vhost_net_set_features() for both tx and rx
> >> queue.
> >>
> >> For vhost_net_build_xdp() called by handle_tx_copy():
> >>
> >> The (gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) checking below may cause a
> >> read of uninitialized data if sock_hlen is zero.
> >
> > Which data is uninitialized here?
>
> The 'gso', as the sock_hlen is zero, there is no copying for:
>
>          copied = copy_page_from_iter(alloc_frag->page,
>                                       alloc_frag->offset +
>                                       offsetof(struct tun_xdp_hdr, gso),
>                                       sock_hlen, from);

I think you're right. This is something we need to fix.

Or we can drop VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR as we managed to survive for years:

https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/1528429842-22835-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com/#1930760

>
> >
> >>
> >> And it seems vhost_hdr is skipped in get_tx_bufs():
> >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/vhost/net.c#L616
> >>
> >> static int vhost_net_build_xdp(struct vhost_net_virtqueue *nvq,
> >>                                struct iov_iter *from)
> >> {
> >> ...
> >>         buflen += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len + pad);
> >>         alloc_frag->offset = ALIGN((u64)alloc_frag->offset, SMP_CACHE_BYTES);
> >>         if (unlikely(!vhost_net_page_frag_refill(net, buflen,
> >>                                                  alloc_frag, GFP_KERNEL)))
> >>                 return -ENOMEM;
> >>
> >>         buf = (char *)page_address(alloc_frag->page) + alloc_frag->offset;
> >>         copied = copy_page_from_iter(alloc_frag->page,
> >>                                      alloc_frag->offset +
> >>                                      offsetof(struct tun_xdp_hdr, gso),
> >>                                      sock_hlen, from);
> >>         if (copied != sock_hlen)
> >>                 return -EFAULT;
> >>
> >>         hdr = buf;
> >>         gso = &hdr->gso;
> >>
> >>         if ((gso->flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) &&
> >>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_start) +
> >>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->csum_offset) + 2 >
> >>             vhost16_to_cpu(vq, gso->hdr_len)) {
> >> ...
> >> }
> >>
> >> I seems the handle_tx_copy() does not handle the VHOST_NET_F_VIRTIO_NET_HDR
> >> case correctly, Or do I miss something obvious here?
> >
> > In get_tx_bufs() we did:
> >
> >         *len = init_iov_iter(vq, &msg->msg_iter, nvq->vhost_hlen, *out);
> >
> > Which covers this case?
>
> It does not seems to cover it, as the vhost_hdr is just skipped without any
> handling in get_tx_bufs():
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/vhost/net.c#L616

My understanding is that in this case vhost can't do more than this as
the socket doesn't know vnet_hdr.

Let's see if Michael is ok with this.

Thanks

>
> >
> > Thanks
>