When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.

This series addresses the thermal ones.

Johan


Johan Hovold (2):
  dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5/hc: fix example node names
  dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5/hc: clean up examples

 .../bindings/thermal/qcom-spmi-adc-tm-hc.yaml    |  8 +++++---
 .../bindings/thermal/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.yaml      | 16 ++++++++++------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

-- 
2.41.0

Hi Daniel and Rafael,

On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:41:12PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
> examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
> 
> This series addresses the thermal ones.

> Johan Hovold (2):
>   dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5/hc: fix example node names
>   dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5/hc: clean up examples

Can we get these merged for 6.8?

Johan

On 19/12/2023 16:59, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Hi Daniel and Rafael,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 06:41:12PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
>> When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
>> examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
>>
>> This series addresses the thermal ones.
> 
>> Johan Hovold (2):
>>    dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5/hc: fix example node names
>>    dt-bindings: thermal: qcom-spmi-adc-tm5/hc: clean up examples
> 
> Can we get these merged for 6.8?

Applied, thanks

-- 
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog