Since commit 8e1f385104ac ("kill task_struct->thread_group") remove
the thread_group, we will encounter below issue.
(gdb) lx-ps
TASK PID COMM
0xffff800086503340 0 swapper/0
Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: There is no member named thread_group.
Error occurred in Python: There is no member named thread_group.
We use signal->thread_head to iterate all threads instead.
Fixes: 8e1f385104ac ("kill task_struct->thread_group")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kuan-Ying Lee <Kuan-Ying.Lee@mediatek.com>
---
scripts/gdb/linux/tasks.py | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/gdb/linux/tasks.py b/scripts/gdb/linux/tasks.py
index 17ec19e9b5bf..7c32f4c8284b 100644
--- a/scripts/gdb/linux/tasks.py
+++ b/scripts/gdb/linux/tasks.py
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
import gdb
-from linux import utils
+from linux import utils, lists
task_type = utils.CachedType("struct task_struct")
@@ -25,13 +25,9 @@ def task_lists():
t = g = init_task
while True:
- while True:
- yield t
-
- t = utils.container_of(t['thread_group']['next'],
- task_ptr_type, "thread_group")
- if t == g:
- break
+ thread_head = t['signal']['thread_head']
+ for thread in lists.list_for_each_entry(thread_head, task_ptr_type, 'thread_node'):
+ yield thread
t = g = utils.container_of(g['tasks']['next'],
task_ptr_type, "tasks")
--
2.18.0
On 11/27, Kuan-Ying Lee wrote:
>
> @@ -25,13 +25,9 @@ def task_lists():
> t = g = init_task
>
> while True:
> - while True:
> - yield t
> -
> - t = utils.container_of(t['thread_group']['next'],
> - task_ptr_type, "thread_group")
> - if t == g:
> - break
> + thread_head = t['signal']['thread_head']
> + for thread in lists.list_for_each_entry(thread_head, task_ptr_type, 'thread_node'):
> + yield thread
>
> t = g = utils.container_of(g['tasks']['next'],
> task_ptr_type, "tasks")
Thanks!
I do not know python, but it seems that with this patch we can kill g or t?
Can't
def task_lists():
task_ptr_type = task_type.get_type().pointer()
init_task = gdb.parse_and_eval("init_task").address
t = init_task
while True:
thread_head = t['signal']['thread_head']
for thread in lists.list_for_each_entry(thread_head, task_ptr_type, 'thread_node'):
yield thread
t = utils.container_of(t['tasks']['next'],
task_ptr_type, "tasks")
if t == init_task:
return
work?
Oleg.
On Mon, 2023-11-27 at 13:03 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> On 11/27, Kuan-Ying Lee wrote:
> >
> > @@ -25,13 +25,9 @@ def task_lists():
> > t = g = init_task
> >
> > while True:
> > - while True:
> > - yield t
> > -
> > - t = utils.container_of(t['thread_group']['next'],
> > - task_ptr_type, "thread_group")
> > - if t == g:
> > - break
> > + thread_head = t['signal']['thread_head']
> > + for thread in lists.list_for_each_entry(thread_head,
> task_ptr_type, 'thread_node'):
> > + yield thread
> >
> > t = g = utils.container_of(g['tasks']['next'],
> > task_ptr_type, "tasks")
>
> Thanks!
>
> I do not know python, but it seems that with this patch we can kill g
> or t?
> Can't
>
> def task_lists():
> task_ptr_type = task_type.get_type().pointer()
> init_task = gdb.parse_and_eval("init_task").address
> t = init_task
>
> while True:
> thread_head = t['signal']['thread_head']
> for thread in lists.list_for_each_entry(thread_head, task_ptr_type,
> 'thread_node'):
> yield thread
>
> t = utils.container_of(t['tasks']['next'],
> task_ptr_type, "tasks")
> if t == init_task:
> return
>
> work?
Yes, you are right.
I will fix it in v2.
Thanks,
Kuan-Ying Lee
>
> Oleg.
>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.