Add devicetree binding for Sophgo CV1800B SoC rtc controller.
Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
---
.../bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..fefb1e70c45c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo CV1800B SoC RTC Controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ enum:
+ - sophgo,cv1800b-rtc
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ interrupts:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - interrupts
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ rtc-controller@05026000{
+ compatible = "sophgo,cv800b-rtc";
+ reg = <0x05026000 0x1000>;
+ interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
+ clocks = <&osc>;
+ };
--
2.25.1
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 17:46:40 +0800, Jingbao Qiu wrote: > Add devicetree binding for Sophgo CV1800B SoC rtc controller. > > Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com> > --- > .../bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: Error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.example.dts:27.28-29 syntax error FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:419: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.example.dtb] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: *** [/builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Makefile:1424: dt_binding_check] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:234: __sub-make] Error 2 doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231121094642.2973795-2-qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
On 21/11/2023 10:46, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> Add devicetree binding for Sophgo CV1800B SoC rtc controller.
A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding for". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fefb1e70c45c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Sophgo CV1800B SoC RTC Controller
What is a RTC Controller? You have multiple RTCs there?
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
> +
Missing ref to rtc.yaml. Unless it is not applicable but then why?
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - sophgo,cv1800b-rtc
Blank line
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - interrupts
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
unevaluatedProperties instead
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + rtc-controller@05026000{
The names is always "rtc", unless this is not RTC. If it isn't, please
add full description of the hardware.
> + compatible = "sophgo,cv800b-rtc";
> + reg = <0x05026000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
> + clocks = <&osc>;
Why do you send untested bindings? Review costs significant amount of
effort. Code was also not compiled? Warnings not fixed?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 5:57 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 21/11/2023 10:46, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> > Add devicetree binding for Sophgo CV1800B SoC rtc controller.
>
> A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "binding for". The
> "dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
will fix.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..fefb1e70c45c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rtc/sophgo,cv1800b-rtc.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: Sophgo CV1800B SoC RTC Controller
>
> What is a RTC Controller? You have multiple RTCs there?
>
will drop "Controller", as I think RTC is not something like I2C, eMMC, USB,
which have the "controller <-> client/device" model.
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > + - Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
> > +
>
> Missing ref to rtc.yaml. Unless it is not applicable but then why?
ok, I should ref this file.
>
> > +properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + enum:
> > + - sophgo,cv1800b-rtc
>
> Blank line
ok
>
> > + reg:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > + interrupts:
> > + maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +required:
> > + - compatible
> > + - reg
> > + - interrupts
> > +
> > +additionalProperties: false
>
> unevaluatedProperties instead
will fix .
>
> > +
> > +examples:
> > + - |
> > + rtc-controller@05026000{
>
> The names is always "rtc", unless this is not RTC. If it isn't, please
> add full description of the hardware.
I will use "rtc" replace "rtc-controller" .
>
> > + compatible = "sophgo,cv800b-rtc";
> > + reg = <0x05026000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + interrupt-parent = <&plic0>;
> > + clocks = <&osc>;
>
> Why do you send untested bindings? Review costs significant amount of
> effort. Code was also not compiled? Warnings not fixed?
I will check it.
Leading 0 and referencing issues will be fixed.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
I'm sorry for taking so long to reply.
I took a few days off due to being infected with the flu.
Thank you again for your patient reply.
Best regards,
Jingbao Qiu
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.