From: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com>
Add dt bindings for:
CN9130 COM Express CPU module
CN9131 COM Express CPU module
AC5X RD COM Express Type 7 carrier board.
AC5X RD COM Express board with a CN9131 COM Express Type 7 CPU module.
Signed-off-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com>
---
.../bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
index 52d78521e412..6b19f23bcf63 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
@@ -60,4 +60,16 @@ properties:
- const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
- const: marvell,armada-ap807
+ - description:
+ Alleycat5X (98DX35xx) Reference Design as COM Express Carrier plus
+ Armada CN9131 COM Express CPU module
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - marvell,ac5x-car-with-cn9131
+ - const: marvell,rd-ac5x-carrier
+ - const: marvell,cn9131-cpu-module
+ - const: marvell,cn9131
+ - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
+ - const: marvell,armada-ap807
+
additionalProperties: true
--
2.25.1
Hi Elad,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.7-rc2 next-20231120]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Elad-Nachman/MAINTAINERS-add-ac5-to-list-of-maintained-Marvell-dts-files/20231119-182821
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231119102638.1041978-3-enachman%40marvell.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] dt-bindings: arm64: add Marvell COM Express boards
compiler: loongarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231120/202311201610.9d8EdO2Y-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311201610.9d8EdO2Y-lkp@intel.com/
dtcheck warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml:64:13: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12 (indentation)
vim +64 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml
8
9 maintainers:
10 - Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>
11
12 properties:
13 $nodename:
14 const: '/'
15 compatible:
16 oneOf:
17
18 - description: Armada 7020 SoC
19 items:
20 - const: marvell,armada7020
21 - const: marvell,armada-ap806-dual
22 - const: marvell,armada-ap806
23
24 - description: Armada 7040 SoC
25 items:
26 - const: marvell,armada7040
27 - const: marvell,armada-ap806-quad
28 - const: marvell,armada-ap806
29
30 - description: Armada 8020 SoC
31 items:
32 - const: marvell,armada8020
33 - const: marvell,armada-ap806-dual
34 - const: marvell,armada-ap806
35
36 - description: Armada 8040 SoC
37 items:
38 - const: marvell,armada8040
39 - const: marvell,armada-ap806-quad
40 - const: marvell,armada-ap806
41
42 - description: Armada CN9130 SoC with no external CP
43 items:
44 - const: marvell,cn9130
45 - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
46 - const: marvell,armada-ap807
47
48 - description: Armada CN9131 SoC with one external CP
49 items:
50 - const: marvell,cn9131
51 - const: marvell,cn9130
52 - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
53 - const: marvell,armada-ap807
54
55 - description: Armada CN9132 SoC with two external CPs
56 items:
57 - const: marvell,cn9132
58 - const: marvell,cn9131
59 - const: marvell,cn9130
60 - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
61 - const: marvell,armada-ap807
62
63 - description:
> 64 Alleycat5X (98DX35xx) Reference Design as COM Express Carrier plus
65 Armada CN9131 COM Express CPU module
66 items:
67 - enum:
68 - marvell,ac5x-car-with-cn9131
69 - const: marvell,rd-ac5x-carrier
70 - const: marvell,cn9131-cpu-module
71 - const: marvell,cn9131
72 - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad
73 - const: marvell,armada-ap807
74
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 12:26:37 +0200, Elad Nachman wrote: > From: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com> > > Add dt bindings for: > CN9130 COM Express CPU module > CN9131 COM Express CPU module > AC5X RD COM Express Type 7 carrier board. > AC5X RD COM Express board with a CN9131 COM Express Type 7 CPU module. > > Signed-off-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com> > --- > .../bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml:64:13: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 10 but found 12 (indentation) dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231119102638.1041978-3-enachman@marvell.com The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency should be noted in *this* patch. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 12:26:37PM +0200, Elad Nachman wrote: > From: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com> > > Add dt bindings for: > CN9130 COM Express CPU module Did you forget this one? There's only the CN9191 system here. > CN9131 COM Express CPU module > AC5X RD COM Express Type 7 carrier board. > AC5X RD COM Express board with a CN9131 COM Express Type 7 CPU module. > > Signed-off-by: Elad Nachman <enachman@marvell.com> > --- > .../bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml > index 52d78521e412..6b19f23bcf63 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/marvell/armada-7k-8k.yaml > @@ -60,4 +60,16 @@ properties: > - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad > - const: marvell,armada-ap807 > > + - description: > + Alleycat5X (98DX35xx) Reference Design as COM Express Carrier plus > + Armada CN9131 COM Express CPU module > + items: > + - enum: > + - marvell,ac5x-car-with-cn9131 Why not just marvell,cn9131-ac5x-carrier or similar? The "with" isn't particularly helpful. Cheers, Conor. > + - const: marvell,rd-ac5x-carrier > + - const: marvell,cn9131-cpu-module > + - const: marvell,cn9131 > + - const: marvell,armada-ap807-quad > + - const: marvell,armada-ap807 > + > additionalProperties: true > -- > 2.25.1 >
> > + - description: > > + Alleycat5X (98DX35xx) Reference Design as COM Express Carrier plus > > + Armada CN9131 COM Express CPU module > > + items: > > + - enum: > > + - marvell,ac5x-car-with-cn9131 > > Why not just marvell,cn9131-ac5x-carrier or similar? The "with" isn't > particularly helpful. As the description says, this is the combination of the SOM plus the carrier to give a complete RDK. Elad, do the RDK as a whole have a name? You can use that here for the compatible. Andrew
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.