pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success.
The documentation for pm_runtime_get_sync() suggests using
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead.

Fixes: 77adb8bdf422 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Allow runtime suspend if UDC unbinded")
Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
---
 drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
index 858fe4c299b7..0330de73cd9c 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
@@ -2745,7 +2745,7 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on)
 	 * successful resume, the DWC3 runtime PM resume routine will handle
 	 * the run stop sequence, so avoid duplicate operations here.
 	 */
-	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dwc->dev);
+	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dwc->dev);
 	if (!ret || ret < 0) {
 		pm_runtime_put(dwc->dev);
 		if (ret < 0)
-- 
2.34.1

Hi,

On 11/13/2023 7:35 AM, Kunwu Chan wrote:
> pm_runtime_get_sync() also returns 1 on success.
> The documentation for pm_runtime_get_sync() suggests using
> pm_runtime_resume_and_get() instead.
> 
> Fixes: 77adb8bdf422 ("usb: dwc3: gadget: Allow runtime suspend if UDC unbinded")
> Signed-off-by: Kunwu Chan <chentao@kylinos.cn>
> ---
>   drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> index 858fe4c299b7..0330de73cd9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c
> @@ -2745,7 +2745,7 @@ static int dwc3_gadget_pullup(struct usb_gadget *g, int is_on)
>   	 * successful resume, the DWC3 runtime PM resume routine will handle
>   	 * the run stop sequence, so avoid duplicate operations here.
>   	 */
> -	ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(dwc->dev);
> +	ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dwc->dev);

If pm_runtime_get_sync() returns 1, that means that the runtime state is 
already in RPM_ACTIVE, so in that case, we should allow for the pullup 
routine to continue.

What is the end issue you're seeing with the current implementation?

>   	if (!ret || ret < 0) {
>   		pm_runtime_put(dwc->dev);

If you think using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() is still necessary, I 
think you'll need to figure out how to address the above put call as 
well.  pm_runtime_resume_and_get() already handles error cases and will 
call a put noidle.

Thanks
Wesley Cheng