drivers/gpio/gpio-elkhartlake.c | 14 +------------- drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.c | 9 +++++---- drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users. Raag Jadav (3): gpio: tangier: use EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper gpio: elkhartlake: reuse pm_ops from Intel Tangier driver gpio: tangier: unexport suspend/resume handles drivers/gpio/gpio-elkhartlake.c | 14 +------------- drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.c | 9 +++++---- drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.h | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) -- 2.17.1
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using > EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users. > > Raag Jadav (3): > gpio: tangier: use EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper > gpio: elkhartlake: reuse pm_ops from Intel Tangier driver > gpio: tangier: unexport suspend/resume handles > > drivers/gpio/gpio-elkhartlake.c | 14 +------------- > drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.c | 9 +++++---- > drivers/gpio/gpio-tangier.h | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using > EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users. Yet you missed --base... Pushed to my review and testing queue, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 05:58:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using > > EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users. > > Yet you missed --base... My understanding is that we use --base only for the patches with explicit in-tree dependency, which this series doesn't have any AFAIK. Will start using it for every patch if it makes everyone happy :) Raag
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:38:44AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 05:58:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using > > > EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users. > > > > Yet you missed --base... > > My understanding is that we use --base only for the patches with explicit > in-tree dependency, which this series doesn't have any AFAIK. > > Will start using it for every patch if it makes everyone happy :) For single patches it's not so critical, only for the series as I'm using b4 to treat them as PRs, so cover letter goes to the merge commit and b4 tries to guess the base (often wrongly). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 01:49:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 06:38:44AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 05:58:34PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 06:45:57PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote: > > > > This series exports pm_ops structure from Intel Tangier GPIO driver using > > > > EXPORT_NS_GPL_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() helper and reuses it into its users. > > > > > > Yet you missed --base... > > > > My understanding is that we use --base only for the patches with explicit > > in-tree dependency, which this series doesn't have any AFAIK. > > > > Will start using it for every patch if it makes everyone happy :) > > For single patches it's not so critical, only for the series as I'm using b4 > to treat them as PRs, so cover letter goes to the merge commit and b4 tries > to guess the base (often wrongly). Understood, will take care from now on. Raag
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.