On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:31:17 +0100
Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Use the previously unused S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64 instead of
> S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64 for defining the fac_mask array.
> Note that both values are the same, there is no functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 427f9528a7b6..46fcd2f9dff8 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -811,7 +811,7 @@ struct s390_io_adapter {
>
> struct kvm_s390_cpu_model {
> /* facility mask supported by kvm & hosting machine */
> - __u64 fac_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_U64];
> + __u64 fac_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_MASK_SIZE_U64];
> struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_subfunc subfuncs;
> /* facility list requested by guest (in dma page) */
> __u64 *fac_list;