.../devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
SM8450's PRNG does not require a core clock reference. Add a new
compatible with a qcom,prng-ee fallback and handle that.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com>
---
I noticed this patch got missed while running make dtbs_check. No
changes to this patch from the original version:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c208796-5ad6-c362-dabc-1228b978ca1d@linaro.org/
.../devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml | 24 +++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml
index bb42f4588b40..36b0ebd9a44b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml
@@ -11,9 +11,13 @@ maintainers:
properties:
compatible:
- enum:
- - qcom,prng # 8916 etc.
- - qcom,prng-ee # 8996 and later using EE
+ oneOf:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,prng # 8916 etc.
+ - qcom,prng-ee # 8996 and later using EE
+ - items:
+ - const: qcom,sm8450-prng-ee
+ - const: qcom,prng-ee
reg:
maxItems: 1
@@ -28,8 +32,18 @@ properties:
required:
- compatible
- reg
- - clocks
- - clock-names
+
+allOf:
+ - if:
+ not:
+ properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ const: qcom,sm8450-prng-ee
+ then:
+ required:
+ - clocks
+ - clock-names
additionalProperties: false
--
2.41.0
On 03/11/2023 23:52, Elliot Berman wrote: > From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> > > SM8450's PRNG does not require a core clock reference. Add a new > compatible with a qcom,prng-ee fallback and handle that. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com> > --- > I noticed this patch got missed while running make dtbs_check. No > changes to this patch from the original version: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c208796-5ad6-c362-dabc-1228b978ca1d@linaro.org/ > I don't understand why do you send this. This is not a correct patch, was rejected. Different patch was already merged. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 11/5/2023 5:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 03/11/2023 23:52, Elliot Berman wrote: >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> >> >> SM8450's PRNG does not require a core clock reference. Add a new >> compatible with a qcom,prng-ee fallback and handle that. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> >> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com> >> --- >> I noticed this patch got missed while running make dtbs_check. No >> changes to this patch from the original version: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c208796-5ad6-c362-dabc-1228b978ca1d@linaro.org/ >> > > I don't understand why do you send this. This is not a correct patch, > was rejected. Different patch was already merged. I see that 6.6 has https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi?h=v6.6#n1741 but bindings not updated: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml?h=v6.6 I came up with similar-ish fix offline, then found Konrad had posted the patch when searching lore. I didn't find any other patch on lore. I think you rejected a proposal to drop "p" from "prng", but this patch doesn't do that and we stayed course with naming scheme. Thanks, Elliot
On 06/11/2023 18:05, Elliot Berman wrote: > > > On 11/5/2023 5:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 03/11/2023 23:52, Elliot Berman wrote: >>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> >>> >>> SM8450's PRNG does not require a core clock reference. Add a new >>> compatible with a qcom,prng-ee fallback and handle that. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> >>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <quic_eberman@quicinc.com> >>> --- >>> I noticed this patch got missed while running make dtbs_check. No >>> changes to this patch from the original version: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/2c208796-5ad6-c362-dabc-1228b978ca1d@linaro.org/ >>> >> >> I don't understand why do you send this. This is not a correct patch, >> was rejected. Different patch was already merged. > > I see that 6.6 has > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi?h=v6.6#n1741 > > but bindings not updated: > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,prng.yaml?h=v6.6 > > I came up with similar-ish fix offline, then found Konrad had posted the patch when searching lore. > I didn't find any other patch on lore. > > I think you rejected a proposal to drop "p" from "prng", but this patch > doesn't do that and we stayed course with naming scheme. Please start working on linux-next, not on the last kernel release. Best regards, Krzysztof
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.