Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document.

Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
       - items:
           - enum:
               - samsung,exynosautov9-pwm
+              - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm
           - const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm
 
   reg:
-- 
2.42.0

Hello,

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:47:46PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
> Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
> index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
>        - items:
>            - enum:
>                - samsung,exynosautov9-pwm
> +              - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm
>            - const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm

Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>

What is the merge plan here? Should this go via the pwm tree, or can it
better go via some exynos tree together with the dts files?

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

On 09/11/2023 07:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:47:46PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>> Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
>> index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
>>        - items:
>>            - enum:
>>                - samsung,exynosautov9-pwm
>> +              - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm
>>            - const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> 
> What is the merge plan here? Should this go via the pwm tree, or can it
> better go via some exynos tree together with the dts files?

I propose I will take it. I will have conflicting change and keeping
bindings with DTS together allows smooth dtbs_check.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On 23. 11. 9. 17:23, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09/11/2023 07:28, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 06:47:46PM +0900, Jaewon Kim wrote:
>>> Add samsung,exynosautov920-pwm compatible string to binding document.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
>>> index 2162f661ed5a..b6beca2ae81e 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.yaml
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ properties:
>>>         - items:
>>>             - enum:
>>>                 - samsung,exynosautov9-pwm
>>> +              - samsung,exynosautov920-pwm
>>>             - const: samsung,exynos4210-pwm
>> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>
>> What is the merge plan here? Should this go via the pwm tree, or can it
>> better go via some exynos tree together with the dts files?
> I propose I will take it. I will have conflicting change and keeping
> bindings with DTS together allows smooth dtbs_check.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>

I also agree it would be better to enter the exynos tree.

Thanks Krzysztof.


Thanks,

Jaewon Kim