On Mon, 2023-10-30 at 14:26 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 06:00:09PM +0800, Moudy Ho wrote:
> > Added the configuration for MT8195 RDMA. In comparison to MT8183,
> it
> > no longer shares SRAM with RSZ, and there are now preconfigured 5
> mbox.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Moudy Ho <moudy.ho@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
> angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3-rdma.yaml | 26
> ++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3-
> rdma.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3-
> rdma.yaml
> > index c043204cf210..504334a76fb3 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3-
> rdma.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/mediatek,mdp3-
> rdma.yaml
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
> > compatible:
> > enum:
> > - mediatek,mt8183-mdp3-rdma
> > + - mediatek,mt8195-mdp3-rdma
> > - mediatek,mt8195-vdo1-rdma
> >
> > reg:
> > @@ -58,7 +59,7 @@ properties:
> >
> > mboxes:
> > minItems: 1
> > - maxItems: 2
> > + maxItems: 5
> >
> > interrupts:
> > maxItems: 1
> > @@ -98,6 +99,29 @@ allOf:
> > - mboxes
> > - mediatek,gce-events
> >
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + compatible:
> > + contains:
> > + const: mediatek,mt8195-mdp3-rdma
> > +
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + clocks:
> > + items:
> > + - description: RDMA clock
> > +
> > + mboxes:
> > + items:
> > + - description: used for 1st data pipe from RDMA
> > + - description: used for 2nd data pipe from RDMA
> > + - description: used for 3rd data pipe from RDMA
> > + - description: used for 4th data pipe from RDMA
> > + - description: used for the data pipe from SPLIT
>
> Following the prior comments, add these entries to the top-level
> 'mboxes' and then here just put 'minItems: 5'.
>
> Rob
Hi Rob,
Thanks for assisting with the review and suggesting an improved method
in patch [2/16] and here for bounding related item quantites.
I have a question regarding the current item description. It seems to
imply a specific order. If the order of the description is different
for any reason, should it be fully re-listed under 'allOf'?
Sincerely,
Moudy