fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
deh defined as an array of type __u16[], and issue is
triggered when it's trying to access an element at
index 1, which is out of bounds because the array
has only one element at index 0.
Reported-by: syzbot+e5bb9eb00a5a5ed2a9a2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e5bb9eb00a5a5ed2a9a2
Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
---
fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
index 3a5a752d96c7..ccf547c5e8e1 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int direntry_create_vi(struct virtual_node *vn,
vn->vn_mode);
dir_u->entry_sizes[i] =
(j ? deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) : ih_item_len(vi->vi_ih)) -
- deh_location(&deh[j]) + DEH_SIZE;
+ deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) + DEH_SIZE;
}
size += (dir_u->entry_count * sizeof(short));
--
2.34.1
On 26/10/23 18:26, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote: > deh defined as an array of type __u16[], and issue is > triggered when it's trying to access an element at > index 1, which is out of bounds because the array > has only one element at index 0. > > Reported-by: syzbot+e5bb9eb00a5a5ed2a9a2@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e5bb9eb00a5a5ed2a9a2 > Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com> > --- > fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c > index 3a5a752d96c7..ccf547c5e8e1 100644 > --- a/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c > +++ b/fs/reiserfs/item_ops.c > @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int direntry_create_vi(struct virtual_node *vn, > vn->vn_mode); > dir_u->entry_sizes[i] = > (j ? deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) : ih_item_len(vi->vi_ih)) - > - deh_location(&deh[j]) + DEH_SIZE; > + deh_location(&deh[j - 1]) + DEH_SIZE; > } > > size += (dir_u->entry_count * sizeof(short)); Could someone help in reviewing the changes. I see reiserfs was marked with obsolete but still wanted to know whether this patch is correct and can be taken (if possible) Thanks, Bragathe
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.