staging: rtl8723bs: fix checkpatch space before tab warning
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c
index 2028791988e7..8bdb685c10e7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void Init_ODM_ComInfo_8723b(struct adapter *Adapter)
 	ODM_CmnInfoInit(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_CUT_VER, cut_ver);
 
 	ODM_CmnInfoInit(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_PATCH_ID, pHalData->CustomerID);
-	/* 	ODM_CMNINFO_BINHCT_TEST only for MP Team */
+	/*  ODM_CMNINFO_BINHCT_TEST only for MP Team */
 	ODM_CmnInfoInit(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_BWIFI_TEST, Adapter->registrypriv.wifi_spec);
 
 	pdmpriv->InitODMFlag = ODM_RF_CALIBRATION|ODM_RF_TX_PWR_TRACK;
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void Update_ODM_ComInfo_8723b(struct adapter *Adapter)
 	/*  Pointer reference */
 	/*  */
 	/* ODM_CMNINFO_MAC_PHY_MODE pHalData->MacPhyMode92D */
-	/* 	ODM_CmnInfoHook(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_MAC_PHY_MODE,&(pDM_Odm->u8_temp)); */
+	/*  ODM_CmnInfoHook(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_MAC_PHY_MODE,&(pDM_Odm->u8_temp)); */
 
 	ODM_CmnInfoUpdate(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_ABILITY, pdmpriv->InitODMFlag);
 
-- 
2.41.0

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Wiktor Grzywacz wrote:
> staging: rtl8723bs: fix checkpatch space before tab warning
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c
> index 2028791988e7..8bdb685c10e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void Init_ODM_ComInfo_8723b(struct adapter *Adapter)
>  	ODM_CmnInfoInit(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_CUT_VER, cut_ver);
>  
>  	ODM_CmnInfoInit(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_PATCH_ID, pHalData->CustomerID);
> -	/* 	ODM_CMNINFO_BINHCT_TEST only for MP Team */
> +	/*  ODM_CMNINFO_BINHCT_TEST only for MP Team */
>  	ODM_CmnInfoInit(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_BWIFI_TEST, Adapter->registrypriv.wifi_spec);
>  
>  	pdmpriv->InitODMFlag = ODM_RF_CALIBRATION|ODM_RF_TX_PWR_TRACK;
> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static void Update_ODM_ComInfo_8723b(struct adapter *Adapter)
>  	/*  Pointer reference */
>  	/*  */
>  	/* ODM_CMNINFO_MAC_PHY_MODE pHalData->MacPhyMode92D */
> -	/* 	ODM_CmnInfoHook(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_MAC_PHY_MODE,&(pDM_Odm->u8_temp)); */
> +	/*  ODM_CmnInfoHook(pDM_Odm, ODM_CMNINFO_MAC_PHY_MODE,&(pDM_Odm->u8_temp)); */

This looks weird now because of the extra space.  Also it's dead,
commented out code.  Just delete it.

regards,
dan carpenter

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:24:20PM +0200, Wiktor Grzywacz wrote:
> staging: rtl8723bs: fix checkpatch space before tab warning
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_dm.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line.  Please read the
  kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend
  it after adding that line.  Note, the line needs to be in the body of
  the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
  email signature.

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what is needed in
  order to properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what a proper
  Subject: line should look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot