arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
This patch fixes sparse complaining about the removal of __iomem address
space when casting the return value of this function ioremap_cache(...)
from `void __ioremap*` to `void*`.
I think there are two way of fixing it, first one is changing the
datatype of variable `ghcb_va` from `void*` to `void __iomem*` .
Second way of fixing it is using the memremap(...) which is
done in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
index 21556ad87f4b..c14161add274 100644
--- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int hyperv_init_ghcb(void)
/* Mask out vTOM bit. ioremap_cache() maps decrypted */
ghcb_gpa &= ~ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary;
- ghcb_va = (void *)ioremap_cache(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE);
+ ghcb_va = memremap(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB);
if (!ghcb_va)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.39.2
From: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 4:29 AM > Subject lines usually have a prefix to indicate the area of the kernel the patch is for. We're not always super consistent with the prefixes, but you can look at the commit log for a file to see what is typically used. In this case, the prefix is usually "x86/hyperv:" > > This patch fixes sparse complaining about the removal of __iomem address > space when casting the return value of this function ioremap_cache(...) > from `void __ioremap*` to `void*`. Should avoid wording like "this patch" in commit messages. See the commit message guidelines in the "Describe your changes" section of Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. A better approach is to just state the problem: "Sparse complains about the removal .....". Then describe the fix. Also avoid pronouns like "I" or "you". > > I think there are two way of fixing it, first one is changing the > datatype of variable `ghcb_va` from `void*` to `void __iomem*` . > Second way of fixing it is using the memremap(...) which is > done in this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> > --- > arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c > index 21556ad87f4b..c14161add274 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c > +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int hyperv_init_ghcb(void) > > /* Mask out vTOM bit. ioremap_cache() maps decrypted */ This comment mentions ioremap_cache(). Since you are changing to use memremap() instead, the comment should be updated to match. > ghcb_gpa &= ~ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary; > - ghcb_va = (void *)ioremap_cache(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE); > + ghcb_va = memremap(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB); As noted in the comment, ioremap_cache() provides a mapping that accesses the memory as decrypted. To be equivalent, the call to memremap() should include the MEMREMAP_DEC flag so that it also is assured of producing a decrypted mapping. Also, corresponding to the current ioremap_cache() call here, there's an iounmap() call in hv_cpu_die(). To maintain proper pairing, that iounmap() call should be changed to memunmap(). It turns out there are other occurrences of this same pattern in Hyper-V specific code in the Linux kernel. See hv_synic_enable_regs(), for example. Did "sparse" flag the same problem in those occurrences? It turns out that Nischala Yelchuri at Microsoft is concurrently working on fixing this occurrence as well as the others we know about in Hyper-V specific code. Michael > > -- > 2.39.2
On 10/29/23 01:40, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote: > From: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2023 4:29 AM >> > > Subject lines usually have a prefix to indicate the area of the kernel > the patch is for. We're not always super consistent with the prefixes, > but you can look at the commit log for a file to see what is > typically used. In this case, the prefix is usually "x86/hyperv:" > >> >> This patch fixes sparse complaining about the removal of __iomem address >> space when casting the return value of this function ioremap_cache(...) >> from `void __ioremap*` to `void*`. > > Should avoid wording like "this patch" in commit messages. See > the commit message guidelines in the "Describe your changes" > section of Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst. A > better approach is to just state the problem: "Sparse complains > about the removal .....". Then describe the fix. Also avoid > pronouns like "I" or "you". > >> >> I think there are two way of fixing it, first one is changing the >> datatype of variable `ghcb_va` from `void*` to `void __iomem*` . >> Second way of fixing it is using the memremap(...) which is >> done in this patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c >> index 21556ad87f4b..c14161add274 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c >> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static int hyperv_init_ghcb(void) >> >> /* Mask out vTOM bit. ioremap_cache() maps decrypted */ > > This comment mentions ioremap_cache(). Since you are changing > to use memremap() instead, the comment should be updated to > match. > >> ghcb_gpa &= ~ms_hyperv.shared_gpa_boundary; >> - ghcb_va = (void *)ioremap_cache(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE); >> + ghcb_va = memremap(ghcb_gpa, HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, MEMREMAP_WB); > > As noted in the comment, ioremap_cache() provides a mapping that > accesses the memory as decrypted. To be equivalent, the call to > memremap() should include the MEMREMAP_DEC flag so that it > also is assured of producing a decrypted mapping. > > Also, corresponding to the current ioremap_cache() call here, > there's an iounmap() call in hv_cpu_die(). To maintain proper > pairing, that iounmap() call should be changed to memunmap(). > > It turns out there are other occurrences of this same pattern in > Hyper-V specific code in the Linux kernel. See hv_synic_enable_regs(), > for example.Did "sparse" flag the same problem in those > occurrences? The particular warning msg for this case is like this "warning: cast removes address space '__iomem' of expression". I only saw these warning one time inside the arch/x86/ directory. >It turns out that Nischala Yelchuri at Microsoft is > concurrently working on fixing this occurrence as well as the > others we know about in Hyper-V specific code. So should I continue or not with this patch? > > Michael > >> >> -- >> 2.39.2 > Thanks for taking out the time for reviewing this and giving the suggestions. Thank You, Abhinav Singh
From: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 2:26 PM > > >It turns out that Nischala Yelchuri at Microsoft is > > concurrently working on fixing this occurrence as well as the > > others we know about in Hyper-V specific code. > > So should I continue or not with this patch? > I'll suggest deferring to Nischala's pending patch. Her patch covers all 5 occurrences. Also, I don't know if you were able to test your patch in a Hyper-V Confidential VM. She did test in that configuration and confirmed that nothing broke. Of course, feel free to correspond directly with Nischala on how best to move forward. I'm an unnecessary intermediary who is just pointing out the overlap. :-) Michael
On 10/30/23 22:08, Michael Kelley (LINUX) wrote: > From: Abhinav Singh <singhabhinav9051571833@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2023 2:26 PM >> >>> It turns out that Nischala Yelchuri at Microsoft is >>> concurrently working on fixing this occurrence as well as the >>> others we know about in Hyper-V specific code. >> >> So should I continue or not with this patch? >> > > I'll suggest deferring to Nischala's pending patch. Her patch > covers all 5 occurrences. Also, I don't know if you were able > to test your patch in a Hyper-V Confidential VM. She did test > in that configuration and confirmed that nothing broke. > > Of course, feel free to correspond directly with Nischala > on how best to move forward. I'm an unnecessary intermediary > who is just pointing out the overlap. :-) > > Michael Okay will ask her about the patch. Thank you for your time to review and guide me :) Abhinav
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.