[PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports

Linus Walleij posted 7 patches 2 years, 2 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports
Posted by Linus Walleij 2 years, 2 months ago
Bindings using dsa.yaml#/$defs/ethernet-ports specify that
a DSA switch node need to have a ports or ethernet-ports
subnode, and that is actually required, so add requirements
using oneOf.

Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml
index 6107189d276a..53ab2158fe2d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml
@@ -46,4 +46,10 @@ $defs:
             $ref: dsa-port.yaml#
             unevaluatedProperties: false
 
+oneOf:
+  - required:
+    - ports
+  - required:
+    - ethernet-ports
+
 ...

-- 
2.34.1
Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports
Posted by Rob Herring 2 years, 2 months ago
On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:24:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Bindings using dsa.yaml#/$defs/ethernet-ports specify that
> a DSA switch node need to have a ports or ethernet-ports
> subnode, and that is actually required, so add requirements
> using oneOf.
> 
> Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 

My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):

yamllint warnings/errors:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml:60:5: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4 (indentation)
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml:62:5: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4 (indentation)

dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:

doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231024-marvell-88e6152-wan-led-v6-1-993ab0949344@linaro.org

The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
should be noted in *this* patch.

If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:

pip3 install dtschema --upgrade

Please check and re-submit after running the above command yourself. Note
that DT_SCHEMA_FILES can be set to your schema file to speed up checking
your schema. However, it must be unset to test all examples with your schema.
Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports
Posted by Linus Walleij 2 years, 2 months ago
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 2:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:24:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > Bindings using dsa.yaml#/$defs/ethernet-ports specify that
> > a DSA switch node need to have a ports or ethernet-ports
> > subnode, and that is actually required, so add requirements
> > using oneOf.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
>
> My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml:60:5: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4 (indentation)
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml:62:5: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4 (indentation)

Oh yeah Krzysztof actually explained to me why these have to have
two spaces extra.

Oh well I just keep hitting the robot for testing this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports
Posted by Vladimir Oltean 2 years, 2 months ago
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 03:18:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 2:48 PM Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Oct 2023 11:24:53 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > Bindings using dsa.yaml#/$defs/ethernet-ports specify that
> > > a DSA switch node need to have a ports or ethernet-ports
> > > subnode, and that is actually required, so add requirements
> > > using oneOf.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> >
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml:60:5: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4 (indentation)
> > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/dsa.yaml:62:5: [warning] wrong indentation: expected 6 but found 4 (indentation)
> 
> Oh yeah Krzysztof actually explained to me why these have to have
> two spaces extra.
> 
> Oh well I just keep hitting the robot for testing this.
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

FWIW, we have a rule in Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst to
not repost more frequently than once every 24 hours. Unfortunately I
don't have a huge review capacity right now, so in my case it could
probably take even a bit more than that. But it's a bit unpleasant that
I left some feedback on v4, you posted v5 yesterday and since then we're
now at v7, only for me to find that I need to repeat my v4 feedback.
Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/7] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Require ports or ethernet-ports
Posted by Linus Walleij 2 years, 2 months ago
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:10 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> wrote:

> FWIW, we have a rule in Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst to
> not repost more frequently than once every 24 hours. Unfortunately I
> don't have a huge review capacity right now, so in my case it could
> probably take even a bit more than that. But it's a bit unpleasant that
> I left some feedback on v4, you posted v5 yesterday and since then we're
> now at v7, only for me to find that I need to repeat my v4 feedback.

I'm sorry, too enthusiastic.
I'll try to pace it down, the patches will not be for v6.7 anyway.

Yours,
Linus Walleij