Hi,
The state of this patch series was set to "Changes Requested", but no
change was requested in V8 and I addressed the changes requested in V7.
Am I missing something or is it a mistake?
On 23.10.2023 12:43, Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) wrote:
> This is the MACsec support for TJA11XX PHYs. The MACsec block encrypts
> the ethernet frames on the fly and has no buffering. This operation will
> grow the frames by 32 bytes. If the frames are sent back to back, the
> MACsec block will not have enough room to insert the SecTAG and the ICV
> and the frames will be dropped.
>
> To mitigate this, the PHY can parse a specific ethertype with some
> padding bytes and replace them with the SecTAG and ICV. These padding
> bytes might be dummy or might contain information about TX SC that must
> be used to encrypt the frame.
>
> Radu P.
>
> Radu Pirea (NXP OSS) (7):
> net: macsec: move sci_to_cpu to macsec header
> net: macsec: documentation for macsec_context and macsec_ops
> net: macsec: revert the MAC address if mdo_upd_secy fails
> net: macsec: introduce mdo_insert_tx_tag
> net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add MACsec support
> net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: add MACsec statistics
> net: phy: nxp-c45-tja11xx: implement mdo_insert_tx_tag
>
> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
> drivers/net/macsec.c | 130 +-
> drivers/net/netdevsim/macsec.c | 5 -
> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 6 +-
> drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c | 1724 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.c | 77 +-
> drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.h | 62 +
> include/net/macsec.h | 54 +
> 9 files changed, 2011 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx-macsec.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/nxp-c45-tja11xx.h
>
--
Radu P.