arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
The I2C busses 1, 2 and 5 have got a separated arbiter clock: add it
to their respective nodes.
Fixes: 2e78620b1350 ("arm64: dts: Add MediaTek MT8186 dts and evaluation board and Makefile")
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi
index f04ae70c470a..af6f6687de35 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi
@@ -1224,8 +1224,9 @@ i2c1: i2c@11008000 {
<0 0x10200200 0 0x100>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 106 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C1>,
- <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>;
- clock-names = "main", "dma";
+ <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>,
+ <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C1_ARBITER>;
+ clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb";
clock-div = <1>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
@@ -1238,8 +1239,9 @@ i2c2: i2c@11009000 {
<0 0x10200300 0 0x180>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C2>,
- <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>;
- clock-names = "main", "dma";
+ <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>,
+ <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C2_ARBITER>;
+ clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb";
clock-div = <1>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
@@ -1280,8 +1282,9 @@ i2c5: i2c@11016000 {
<0 0x10200700 0 0x100>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 354 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C5>,
- <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>;
- clock-names = "main", "dma";
+ <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>,
+ <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C5_ARBITER>;
+ clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb";
clock-div = <1>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
--
2.42.0
On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 09:55 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > The I2C busses 1, 2 and 5 have got a separated arbiter clock: add it > to their respective nodes. > > Fixes: 2e78620b1350 ("arm64: dts: Add MediaTek MT8186 dts and > evaluation board and Makefile") > Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi > index f04ae70c470a..af6f6687de35 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi > @@ -1224,8 +1224,9 @@ i2c1: i2c@11008000 { > <0 0x10200200 0 0x100>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 106 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH > 0>; > clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap > CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C1>, > - <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>; > - clock-names = "main", "dma"; > + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>, > + <&infracfg_ao > CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C1_ARBITER>; > + clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb"; > clock-div = <1>; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > @@ -1238,8 +1239,9 @@ i2c2: i2c@11009000 { > <0 0x10200300 0 0x180>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH > 0>; > clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap > CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C2>, > - <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>; > - clock-names = "main", "dma"; > + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>, > + <&infracfg_ao > CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C2_ARBITER>; > + clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb"; > clock-div = <1>; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; > @@ -1280,8 +1282,9 @@ i2c5: i2c@11016000 { > <0 0x10200700 0 0x100>; > interrupts = <GIC_SPI 354 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH > 0>; > clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap > CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C5>, > - <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>; > - clock-names = "main", "dma"; > + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>, > + <&infracfg_ao > CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C5_ARBITER>; > + clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb"; > clock-div = <1>; > #address-cells = <1>; > #size-cells = <0>; In previous discussion[1], if the arbiter clock is not added into dts node does trackpad lost its functionality before system suspend/resume? And is this patch meant to solve the same issue in [1]? Reply on behalf of our i2c PIC. Sorry for late reply Best Regards, YuChang [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/32d51e40-5d9c-47dd-bb62-2ccc811ac6dc@collabora.com/
Il 08/11/23 07:56, Yu-chang Lee (李禹璋) ha scritto: > On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 09:55 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> The I2C busses 1, 2 and 5 have got a separated arbiter clock: add it >> to their respective nodes. >> >> Fixes: 2e78620b1350 ("arm64: dts: Add MediaTek MT8186 dts and >> evaluation board and Makefile") >> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < >> angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi | 15 +++++++++------ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi >> index f04ae70c470a..af6f6687de35 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8186.dtsi >> @@ -1224,8 +1224,9 @@ i2c1: i2c@11008000 { >> <0 0x10200200 0 0x100>; >> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 106 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH >> 0>; >> clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap >> CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C1>, >> - <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>; >> - clock-names = "main", "dma"; >> + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>, >> + <&infracfg_ao >> CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C1_ARBITER>; >> + clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb"; >> clock-div = <1>; >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> @@ -1238,8 +1239,9 @@ i2c2: i2c@11009000 { >> <0 0x10200300 0 0x180>; >> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 107 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH >> 0>; >> clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap >> CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C2>, >> - <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>; >> - clock-names = "main", "dma"; >> + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>, >> + <&infracfg_ao >> CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C2_ARBITER>; >> + clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb"; >> clock-div = <1>; >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; >> @@ -1280,8 +1282,9 @@ i2c5: i2c@11016000 { >> <0 0x10200700 0 0x100>; >> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 354 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH >> 0>; >> clocks = <&imp_iic_wrap >> CLK_IMP_IIC_WRAP_AP_CLOCK_I2C5>, >> - <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>; >> - clock-names = "main", "dma"; >> + <&infracfg_ao CLK_INFRA_AO_AP_DMA>, >> + <&infracfg_ao >> CLK_INFRA_AO_I2C5_ARBITER>; >> + clock-names = "main", "dma", "arb"; >> clock-div = <1>; >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <0>; > > In previous discussion[1], if the arbiter clock is not added into dts > node does trackpad lost its functionality before system suspend/resume? > And is this patch meant to solve the same issue in [1]? > > Reply on behalf of our i2c PIC. > Yes, it loses functionality sometimes after PM resume, but with this added clock the problem is solved. And yes, it's the same as [1]. Regards, Angelo
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.