AHB memory as MMIO should be mapped with ioremap rather than ioremap_wc,
which should have been used initially just to handle unaligned access as
a workaround.

Fixes: d166a73503ef ("spi: fspi: dynamically alloc AHB memory")
Signed-off-by: Han Xu <han.xu@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
index 65408056daa8..e13f678f2395 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
@@ -759,7 +759,7 @@ static int nxp_fspi_read_ahb(struct nxp_fspi *f, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
 		f->memmap_len = len > NXP_FSPI_MIN_IOMAP ?
 				len : NXP_FSPI_MIN_IOMAP;
 
-		f->ahb_addr = ioremap_wc(f->memmap_phy + f->memmap_start,
+		f->ahb_addr = ioremap(f->memmap_phy + f->memmap_start,
 					 f->memmap_len);
 
 		if (!f->ahb_addr) {
-- 
2.34.1

On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 15:15:24 -0500, Han Xu wrote:
> AHB memory as MMIO should be mapped with ioremap rather than ioremap_wc,
> which should have been used initially just to handle unaligned access as
> a workaround.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: nxp-fspi: use the correct ioremap function
      commit: c3aa5cb264a38ae9bbcce32abca4c155af0456df

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark