There's not much point in having unused labels in the binding example,
so drop them.

This patch was originally motivated by ea25d61b448a ("arm64: dts: qcom:
Use plural _gpios node label for PMIC gpios") updating all dts files to
use the plural _gpios label instead of the singular _gpio as label but
this example wasn't updated. But since we should just drop the label
alltogether, do that.

Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
index 55e931ba5b47..9fa568603930 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
@@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ examples:
         interrupt-controller;
         #interrupt-cells = <4>;
 
-        pmi8998_lsid0: pmic@2 {
+        pmic@2 {
             compatible = "qcom,pmi8998", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
             reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
             #address-cells = <1>;
             #size-cells = <0>;
 
-            pmi8998_gpio: gpio@c000 {
+            gpio@c000 {
                 compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
                 reg = <0xc000>;
                 gpio-controller;
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ examples:
             };
         };
 
-        pm6150_gpio: gpio@c000 {
+        gpio@c000 {
             compatible = "qcom,pm6150-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
             reg = <0xc000>;
             gpio-controller;

-- 
2.42.0

On 02/10/2023 09:00, Luca Weiss wrote:
> There's not much point in having unused labels in the binding example,
> so drop them.
> 
> This patch was originally motivated by ea25d61b448a ("arm64: dts: qcom:
> Use plural _gpios node label for PMIC gpios") updating all dts files to
> use the plural _gpios label instead of the singular _gpio as label but
> this example wasn't updated. But since we should just drop the label
> alltogether, do that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 09:00:11AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> There's not much point in having unused labels in the binding example,
> so drop them.
> 
> This patch was originally motivated by ea25d61b448a ("arm64: dts: qcom:
> Use plural _gpios node label for PMIC gpios") updating all dts files to
> use the plural _gpios label instead of the singular _gpio as label but
> this example wasn't updated. But since we should just drop the label
> alltogether, do that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>

Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>

Thanks,
Conor.

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> index 55e931ba5b47..9fa568603930 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml
> @@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ examples:
>          interrupt-controller;
>          #interrupt-cells = <4>;
>  
> -        pmi8998_lsid0: pmic@2 {
> +        pmic@2 {
>              compatible = "qcom,pmi8998", "qcom,spmi-pmic";
>              reg = <0x2 SPMI_USID>;
>              #address-cells = <1>;
>              #size-cells = <0>;
>  
> -            pmi8998_gpio: gpio@c000 {
> +            gpio@c000 {
>                  compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>                  reg = <0xc000>;
>                  gpio-controller;
> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ examples:
>              };
>          };
>  
> -        pm6150_gpio: gpio@c000 {
> +        gpio@c000 {
>              compatible = "qcom,pm6150-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio";
>              reg = <0xc000>;
>              gpio-controller;
> 
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 

On Mon, 02 Oct 2023 09:00:11 +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> There's not much point in having unused labels in the binding example,
> so drop them.
> 
> This patch was originally motivated by ea25d61b448a ("arm64: dts: qcom:
> Use plural _gpios node label for PMIC gpios") updating all dts files to
> use the plural _gpios label instead of the singular _gpio as label but
> this example wasn't updated. But since we should just drop the label
> alltogether, do that.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/2] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: Drop unused labels from examples
      commit: cac94656ff2b16827d7cd455f0d3746280cf3138

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]