[PATCH v1 9/9] ACPI: NFIT: Don't use KBUILD_MODNAME for driver name

Michal Wilczynski posted 9 patches 2 years, 4 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v1 9/9] ACPI: NFIT: Don't use KBUILD_MODNAME for driver name
Posted by Michal Wilczynski 2 years, 4 months ago
Driver name is part of the ABI, so it should be hard-coded, as ABI
should be always kept backward compatible. Prevent ABI from changing
accidentally in case KBUILD_MODNAME change.

Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Wilczynski <michal.wilczynski@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
index f09530d2520a..987eb5567036 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
@@ -3478,7 +3478,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, acpi_nfit_ids);
 static struct platform_driver acpi_nfit_driver = {
 	.probe = acpi_nfit_probe,
 	.driver = {
-		.name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
+		.name = "nfit",
 		.acpi_match_table = acpi_nfit_ids,
 	},
 };
-- 
2.41.0
Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] ACPI: NFIT: Don't use KBUILD_MODNAME for driver name
Posted by Andy Shevchenko 2 years, 4 months ago
On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:48:42PM +0300, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> Driver name is part of the ABI, so it should be hard-coded, as ABI
> should be always kept backward compatible. Prevent ABI from changing
> accidentally in case KBUILD_MODNAME change.

This is up to maintainers, probably we won't have any users outside of existing
model (instantiating via ACPI ID). All the above is "strictly speaking"...

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 9/9] ACPI: NFIT: Don't use KBUILD_MODNAME for driver name
Posted by Dan Williams 2 years, 4 months ago
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 05:48:42PM +0300, Michal Wilczynski wrote:
> > Driver name is part of the ABI, so it should be hard-coded, as ABI
> > should be always kept backward compatible. Prevent ABI from changing
> > accidentally in case KBUILD_MODNAME change.
> 
> This is up to maintainers, probably we won't have any users outside of existing
> model (instantiating via ACPI ID). All the above is "strictly speaking"...

...right, more than 8 years for this "risk" to materialize indicates
it's a non-issue to me.